World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
7759
World Ranking
6408
National Ranking
2304

Trent L. McDonald publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trent L. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 113 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Trent L. McDonald D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trent L. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Trent L. McDonald is an Independent Scientist and Consultant based in the United States, specializing in Environmental Science with a focus on Ecology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Global and Planetary Change.

The primary topics of McDonald's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Marine animal studies, Avian ecology and behavior, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, and Fire effects on ecosystems. These areas reflect a broad engagement with both terrestrial and marine ecological systems and their responses to environmental change.

McDonald has published extensively in several notable scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include Ecological Applications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Conservation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Conservation Science and Practice. This range suggests active participation in both applied and theoretical ecological research communities.

  • Ecological Applications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Conservation
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Conservation Science and Practice

Recent papers authored or coauthored by McDonald cover a variety of ecological and conservation topics. Representative publications include:

  • "Range-wide declines of northern spotted owl populations in the Pacific Northwest: A meta-analysis," 2021, Biological Conservation
  • "Invader removal triggers competitive release in a threatened avian predator," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Conservation of rare and cryptic species: Challenges of uncertainty and opportunities for progress," 2022, Conservation Science and Practice
  • "Detecting changes in the distribution of calling bowhead whales exposed to fluctuating anthropogenic sounds," 2023, The journal of cetacean research and management. Special issue
  • "Curtailment and acoustic deterrents reduce bat mortality at wind farms," 2022, Journal of Wildlife Management

McDonald collaborates frequently with a group of researchers including Keith A. Hamm, David W. Lamphear, Alan B. Franklin, Katie M. Dugger, and Damon B. Lesmeister. These collaborations suggest a networked approach to addressing ecological and conservation questions involving species distribution, predator-prey interactions, and management interventions.

  • Keith A. Hamm
  • David W. Lamphear
  • Alan B. Franklin
  • Katie M. Dugger
  • Damon B. Lesmeister

Best Publications

  • Resource Selection Functions Based on Use-Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods

    Chris J. Johnson;Scott E. Nielsen;Evelyn H. Merrill;Trent L. McDONALD

  • Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis

    Steven C. Amstrup;Trent L. McDonald;Bryan F. J. Manly

  • Predicting 21st‐century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models

    George M. Durner;David C. Douglas;Ryan M. Nielson;Steven C. Amstrup

  • Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf /elk predator /prey system

    M. Hebblewhite;E. H. Merrill;T. L. McDonald

  • Interactive effects of prey and weather on golden eagle reproduction

    Karen Steenhof;Michael N. Kochert;Trent L. Mcdonald

  • Polar bear population dynamics in the southern Beaufort Sea during a period of sea ice decline

    Jeffrey F. Bromaghin;Trent L. McDonald;Ian Stirling;Andrew E. Derocher

  • Survival rates and causes of mortality of Amur tigers on and near the Sikhote‐Alin Biosphere Zapovednik

    J. M. Goodrich;L. L. Kerley;E. N. Smirnov;D. G. Miquelle

  • Analysis of count data from before-after control-impact studies

    Trent L. McDonald;Wallace P. Erickson;Lyman L. McDonald

  • The effects of habitat, climate, and Barred Owls on long-term demography of Northern Spotted Owls

    Katie M. Dugger;Eric D. Forsman;Alan B. Franklin;Raymond J. Davis

  • Population dynamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis): a meta-analysis

    Alan B. Franklin;R. J. Gutiérrez;James D. Nichols;Mark E. Seamans

  • Review of environmental monitoring methods: survey designs.

    Trent L. McDonald

  • Discrete-Choice Modeling in Wildlife Studies Exemplified by Northern Spotted Owl Nighttime Habitat Selection

    Trent L. McDONALD;Bryan F. J. Manly;Ryan M. Nielson;Lowell V. Diller

  • Evaluation of an Unmanned Airborne System for Monitoring Marine Mammals

    William R. Koski;Travis Allen;Darren Ireland;Greg Buck

  • Using satellite radiotelemetry data to delineate and manage wildlife populations

    Steven C. Amstrup;Trent L. McDonald;George M. Durner

  • Effects of Airgun Sounds on Bowhead Whale Calling Rates: Evidence for Two Behavioral Thresholds

    Susanna B. Blackwell;Christopher S. Nations;Trent L. McDonald;Aaron M. Thode

  • Abundance, behavior, and movement patterns of western gray whales in relation to a 3-D seismic survey, Northeast Sakhalin Island, Russia.

    Glenn Gailey;Bernd Würsig;Trent L. McDonald

  • Estimation of population size using open capture-recapture models

    Trent L. McDonald;Steven C. Amstrup

  • Regional and seasonal feeding by bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus as indicated by stable isotope ratios

    Sang Heon Lee;Donald M. Schell;Trent L. McDonald;W. John Richardson

  • Influence of human development and predators on nest survival of tundra birds, Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska

    J. R. Liebezeit;S. J. Kendall;S. Brown;C. B. Johnson

  • Effects of airgun sounds on bowhead whale calling rates in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea

    Susanna B. Blackwell;Christopher S. Nations;Trent L. McDonald;Charles R. Greene

  • Reproductive outcome and survival of common bottlenose dolphins sampled in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, USA, following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

    Suzanne M. Lane;Cynthia R. Smith;Jason Mitchell;Brian C. Balmer

  • Polar bears in the Beaufort Sea: A 30-year mark-recapture case history

    Steven C. Amstrup;T.L. McDonald;I. Stirling

  • The point process use-availability or presence-only likelihood and comments on analysis.

    Trent L. McDonald

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven C. Amstrup
Steven C. Amstrup United States Geological Survey
James D. Nichols
James D. Nichols United States Geological Survey
Gary C. White
Gary C. White Colorado State University
Alan B. Franklin
Alan B. Franklin United States Department of Agriculture
James E. Hines
James E. Hines United States Geological Survey
Ian Stirling
Ian Stirling University of Alberta
Charles B. Yackulic
Charles B. Yackulic United States Geological Survey
Larissa L. Bailey
Larissa L. Bailey Colorado State University
David C. Douglas
David C. Douglas United States Geological Survey
Eric D. Forsman
Eric D. Forsman US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many look for programs that balance academic rigor with flexibility, considering what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get without compromising quality. This approach helps learners customize their study paths based on their strengths and interests.

Specialized fields like geology and geographic information systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental studies. Pursuing an online geology degree allows students to dive into earth sciences, understanding natural processes that directly impact environmental policies. Similarly, the best GIS schools offer essential training in mapping and spatial analysis, skills increasingly demanded in environmental management and planning.

Beyond technical expertise, leadership skills are vital for driving change in environmental sectors. One-year online MPA programs provide accelerated pathways for students aiming to enhance their management abilities while applying public administration principles to environmental projects and policy development.

By integrating disciplines from the recommended online degree options, individuals can build robust careers tackling global environmental challenges with a well-rounded skillset.

Explore more about what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, the online geology degree, find the best GIS schools, and consider programs like the best online MPA to shape your future in environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Trent L. McDonald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles