World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9514
World Ranking
5684
National Ranking
389

Stephen J. Lupker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Lupker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen J. Lupker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Lupker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Lupker is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences, and Education.

The scientist concentrates on key topics including Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Reading and Literacy Development, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Second Language Acquisition and Learning, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, as well as Language Development and Disorders.

Stephen J. Lupker has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Their recent papers include:

  • "Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds." (2020) - Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm." (2022) - Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "L2-L1 noncognate masked translation priming as a task-specific phenomenon" (2020) - Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • "The origins of backward priming effects in logographic scripts for four-character words" (2020) - Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects." (2020) - Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Frequent collaborators in their research include Giacomo Spinelli, Huilan Yang, Masahiro Yoshihara, Mariko Nakayama, and Yasushi Hino. Collaboration with Giacomo Spinelli is notably extensive, reflected by a significant number of joint publications.

Best Publications

  • The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task

    Stephen J. Lupker

  • Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆

    Manuel Perea;Stephen J Lupker

  • Semantic Priming without Association: A Second Look.

    Stephen J. Lupker

  • The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: support for non-selective access to bilingual memory.

    Annette M.B. de Groot;Philip Delmaar;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.

    Manuel Perea;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Masked priming : the state of the art

    Sachiko Kinoshita;Stephen Jeffrey Lupker

  • Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines?

    Stephen J. Lupker;Patrick Brown;Lucia Colombo

  • Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition.

    Colin J. Davis;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition

    Chris R. Sears;Yasushi Hino;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts

    Yasushi Hino;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming

    Manuel Perea;Stephen J. Lupker

  • The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks

    Penny M. Pexman;Stephen J. Lupker;Yasushi Hino

  • The Role of Phonetic and Orthographic Similarity in Picture-Word Interference*

    Stephen J. Lupker

  • Homophone effects in lexical decision.

    Penny M. Pexman;Stephen J. Lupker;Debra Jared

  • Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.

    Yasushi Hino;Stephen J. Lupker;Penny M. Pexman

  • Input, Decision, and Response Factors in Picture-Word Interference

    Stephen J. Lupker;Albert N. Katz

  • Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency

    Stephen J. Lupker;Manuel Perea;Colin J. Davis

  • Sequential effects in naming: a time-criterion account.

    Tamsen E. Taylor;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?

    Penny M. Pexman;Stephen J. Lupker

  • Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts.

    Ray Grondin;Stephen J. Lupker;Ken McRae

Frequent Co-Authors

Penny M. Pexman
Penny M. Pexman University of Calgary
Manuel Perea
Manuel Perea University of Valencia
Kathleen Rastle
Kathleen Rastle Royal Holloway University of London
Max Coltheart
Max Coltheart Macquarie University
Ken McRae
Ken McRae University of Western Ontario
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Jeffrey S. Bowers University of Bristol
Kenneth I. Forster
Kenneth I. Forster University of Arizona
Annette M. B. de Groot
Annette M. B. de Groot University of Amsterdam
Melvin J. Yap
Melvin J. Yap National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology students have a diverse range of online degree options and career paths to consider. Many prospective professionals wonder, are online psychology degrees accepted by employers? The good news is that many employers recognize reputable, accredited online degrees, especially as remote learning becomes more common.

Choosing between a ba vs bs psychology degree can also impact your future. A Bachelor of Arts (BA) often emphasizes broader liberal arts studies, while a Bachelor of Science (BS) dives deeper into math and science, better preparing students for research or clinical roles.

Psychology offers a wide range of specialized careers. For instance, those interested in law enforcement or the legal system can explore what it takes to become a forensic psychologist. The forensic psychologist education requirements typically include advanced study and specialized training in both psychology and criminal justice.

Another popular pathway is behavior analysis. The behavior analyst salary and career prospects often appeal to those interested in helping individuals with behavioral disorders or autism spectrum conditions. Understanding these pathways empowers students to make informed decisions about their education and future careers in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Lupker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles