World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7898 7369 778 743 123 7085

Jeffrey S. Bowers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey S. Bowers between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey S. Bowers published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 9 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1989 2026

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey S. Bowers: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 5
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 5
2001 0
2002 3
2003 9
2004 5
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 8
2010 6
2011 4
2012 6
2013 5
2014 4
2015 1
2016 5
2017 7
2018 9
2019 11
2020 13
2021 15
2022 13
2023 15
2024 9
2025 8
2026 1
Total 187
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Bowers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Bowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Bowers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Bowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive psychology

His main research concerns Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Priming, Word recognition and Orthography. His Cognitive psychology research includes elements of Perception, Indirect tests of memory, Implicit memory and Neural coding. His Indirect tests of memory research incorporates elements of Memoria, Associative priming, Paired associate learning and Intentionality.

Cognition is a subfield of Neuroscience that Jeffrey S. Bowers explores. His Word recognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Semantics, Visual perception and Communication. Jeffrey S. Bowers usually deals with Orthography and limits it to topics linked to Phonology and Backward masking, Set, Speech production and Spelling.

His most cited work include:

  • Implicit memory and test awareness. (359 citations)
  • Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion (316 citations)
  • Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience (247 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cognitive psychology, Artificial intelligence, Priming, Cognition and Artificial neural network. The concepts of his Cognitive psychology study are interwoven with issues in Orthography, Speech perception, Perception, Word and Word recognition. His Word recognition research focuses on Visual perception and how it relates to Speech recognition.

His studies examine the connections between Artificial intelligence and genetics, as well as such issues in Natural language processing, with regards to Semantics and Categorization. His studies in Priming integrate themes in fields like Implicit memory and Lexical decision task. His Cognition research incorporates themes from Bayesian probability, Cognitive science, Reading and Set.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cognitive psychology (31.54%)
  • Artificial intelligence (27.69%)
  • Priming (20.77%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (27.69%)
  • Convolutional neural network (7.69%)
  • Pattern recognition (7.69%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jeffrey S. Bowers mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Convolutional neural network, Pattern recognition, Artificial neural network and Reading. His Artificial intelligence research focuses on subjects like Natural language processing, which are linked to Range and Agreement. His research integrates issues of Adversarial system, Speech recognition and Pooling in his study of Convolutional neural network.

His Connectionism study, which is part of a larger body of work in Artificial neural network, is frequently linked to Selectivity, Task analysis and Context-free language, bridging the gap between disciplines. The Reading study which covers Spelling that intersects with Word, Speech sounds and Alphabetic principle. His Word research includes elements of Cognitive psychology, Vocabulary and Cognition.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond. (18 citations)
  • Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction (13 citations)
  • Progress in Reading Instruction Requires a Better Understanding of the English Spelling System (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive science

Artificial intelligence, Phonics, Artificial neural network, Pattern recognition and Reading are his primary areas of study. His research in the fields of Convolutional neural network and Deep learning overlaps with other disciplines such as Translation and Biological constraints. Phonics is closely attributed to Cognitive psychology in his research.

His biological study deals with issues like Theoretical computer science, which deal with fields such as Generalization. His Pattern recognition study incorporates themes from Pixel, Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition, Visual processing and Feature. His Reading research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Spelling and Meaning.

Best Publications

  • Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Colin J. Davis

  • Implicit memory and test awareness.

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion

    Daniel L. Schacter;Jeffrey Bowers;Jill Booker

  • Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks

    Markus F. Damian;Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience.

    Jeffrey S Bowers

  • On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: Implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience

    Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Gabriella Vigliocco;Richard Haan

  • Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm

    Markus F E Damian;Jeffrey S Bowers

  • Interfering neighbours : The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Colin J. Davis;Colin J. Davis;Derek A. Hanley

  • Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects

    Colin J. Davis;Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Peter N. Bowers

  • In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification

    Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that?

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Colin J. Davis;Derek A. Hanley

  • Masked priming: State of the Art

    Jeffrey S Bowers

  • Rethinking Implicit Memory

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Chad J. Marsolek

  • Swearing, Euphemisms, and Linguistic Relativity

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce

  • Teaching adults new words: the role of practice and consolidation.

    Felix Clay;Jeffrey S. Bowers;Colin J. Davis;Derek A. Hanley

  • Is that what Bayesians believe? reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).

    Jeffrey S. Bowers;Colin J. Davis

  • What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition

    Colin J. Davis;Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along?

    Jeffrey S. Bowers

  • Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia

    Jeffrey S Bowers

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus F. Damian
Markus F. Damian University of Bristol
Martin Arguin
Martin Arguin University of Montreal
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Gabriella Vigliocco
Gabriella Vigliocco University College London
Sven L. Mattys
Sven L. Mattys University of York
Stephen J. Lupker
Stephen J. Lupker University of Western Ontario
David P. Vinson
David P. Vinson University College London
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Kenneth I. Forster
Kenneth I. Forster University of Arizona
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a psychology career in the USA, pursuing an online degree can be a flexible way to meet educational requirements. A common pathway is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Each state maintains its own standards for LPC licensure, including required coursework, supervised experience, and examinations.

For instance, you can review the Pennsylvania licensed professional counselor requirements to learn about the specific degree and internship obligations needed in Pennsylvania. Similarly, the lpc licensure requirements in Rhode Island outline the necessary graduate studies and licensing exams for that state.

In addition, South Carolina licensed professional counselor requirements emphasize tailored coursework and a significant number of supervised practice hours. Meanwhile, those pursuing the lpc licensure requirements in South Dakota will also encounter unique credentialing steps.

Prospective students should review their state’s laws to ensure that any online psychology or counseling program aligns with local licensing requirements and career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey S. Bowers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles