World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
6809
World Ranking
10081
National Ranking
986

Sven L. Mattys publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven L. Mattys sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sven L. Mattys D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven L. Mattys sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sven L. Mattys is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily intersects the fields of neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience, speech and hearing, and experimental and cognitive psychology. They also contribute to subfields such as sensory systems and signal processing.

The scientist's work centers on several key topics including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research

They have published multiple papers in various research venues. Their recent publications include:

  • "Effortful listening under the microscope: Examining relations between pupillometric and subjective markers of effort and tiredness from listening," 2020, Psychophysiology
  • "Older adults show a more sustained pattern of effortful listening than young adults," 2021, Psychology and Aging
  • "Predictors of Listening-Related Fatigue Across the Adult Life Span," 2021, Psychological Science
  • "Conceptualising acoustic and cognitive contributions to divided-attention listening within a data-limit versus resource-limit framework," 2023, Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Sensory-Processing Sensitivity Predicts Fatigue From Listening, But Not Perceived Effort, in Young and Older Adults," 2023, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Frequently published venues for their research include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Psychological Science

Collaborations are a notable aspect of their research profile. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ronan McGarrigle
  • Lyndon Rakusen
  • Sarah Knight
  • Alex Mepham

Overall, Sven L. Mattys conducts research that bridges neuroscience and auditory sciences, with attention to cognitive mechanisms underlying listening effort, fatigue, and auditory processing across the adult lifespan.

Best Publications

  • Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review

    Sven L. Mattys;Matthew H. Davis;Ann R. Bradlow;Sophie K. Scott

  • Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants

    Sven L. Mattys;Peter W. Jusczyk;Paul A. Luce;James L. Morgan

  • Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies

    Laurence White;Sven L. Mattys

  • Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework

    Sven L. Mattys;Laurence White;James F. Melhorn

  • Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.

    Sven L Mattys;Peter W Jusczyk

  • Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.

    Sven L. Mattys;Joanna Brooks;Martin Cooke;Martin Cooke

  • Quantifying Speech Rhythm Abnormalities in the Dysarthrias

    Julie M. Liss;Laurence White;Sven L. Mattys;Kaitlin Lansford

  • Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns

    Sven L. Mattys;Peter W. Jusczyk

  • Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition

    Sven L. Mattys;Lukas Wiget

  • Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English.

    Rebecca Scarborough;Patricia Keating;Sven L. Mattys;Taehong Cho

  • Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages

    Laurence White;Sven L. Mattys

  • How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm

    Lukas Wiget;Laurence White;Barbara Schuppler;Izabelle Grenon

  • Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection

    Sven L. Mattys;Jamie H. Clark

  • The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review

    Sven L. Mattys

  • The Role of Lip-reading and Cued Speech in the Processing of Phonological Information in French-educated Deaf Children

    Jesus Alegria;Brigitte L. Charlier;Sven Mattys

  • Stress versus coarticulation: toward an integrated approach to explicit speech segmentation.

    Sven L. Mattys

  • Language categorization by adults is based on sensitivity to durational cues, not rhythm class

    Laurence White;Sven L. Mattys;Lukas Wiget

  • The perception of primary and secondary stress in English.

    Sven L. Mattys

  • Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation☆

    Laura C. Dilley;Sven L. Mattys;Louis Vinke

  • How lexical stress affects speech segmentation and interactivity : Evidence from the migration paradigm

    Sven L. Mattys;Arthur G. Samuel

  • On building models of spoken-word recognition: when there is as much to learn from natural "oddities" as artificial normality.

    Sven L. Mattys;Julie M. Liss

  • Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: a study of resynthesized speech.

    Stephanie M. Spitzer;Julie M. Liss;Sven L. Mattys

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Cooke
Martin Cooke Ikerbasque
Arthur G. Samuel
Arthur G. Samuel Stony Brook University
John N. Caviness
John N. Caviness Mayo Clinic
Marco Baroni
Marco Baroni Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Abeer Alwan
Abeer Alwan University of California, Los Angeles
Sophie K. Scott
Sophie K. Scott University College London
Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Jeffrey S. Bowers University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to various related disciplines, with social work being a prominent pathway. Social work shares overlapping skills and knowledge with psychology and offers dynamic opportunities to impact communities and individual lives.

Many aspiring professionals pursue specialized online degrees to fit their schedules and career needs. Prospective students looking for regional excellence might explore the best social work programs in the Northeast, which feature robust curricula and renowned faculty. In Oklahoma, there are tailored options designed to address unique local demands, such as the best social work degrees in Oklahoma.

Those interested in urban settings may consider programs closely linked to community needs, like the top social work degrees in Philadelphia. Alternatively, the Pacific Northwest is home to innovative training opportunities, showcased by the best social work programs in Portland.

By evaluating program strengths and geographic preferences, students can find the right online degree to match their career trajectory, whether it’s in clinical practice, research, or community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Sven L. Mattys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles