World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9879
World Ranking
6135
National Ranking
3336

Arthur G. Samuel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur G. Samuel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur G. Samuel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur G. Samuel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur G. Samuel is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with significant focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Linguistics and Language.

The main topics covered in their work include Phonetics and Phonology Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Multisensory perception and integration, Language Development and Disorders, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Linguistic Variation and Morphology, and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation.

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications in various venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Language Cognition and Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or coauthored by the scientist include:

  • "Examining bilingual language switching across the lifespan in cued and voluntary switching contexts." (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance)
  • "An evolutionary account of intermodality differences in statistical learning" (2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences)
  • "Flexibility and stability of speech sounds: The time course of lexically-driven recalibration" (2023, Journal of Phonetics)
  • "Semantic priming effects can be modulated by crosslinguistic interactions during second-language auditory word recognition" (2020, Bilingualism Language and Cognition)
  • "Just give it time: Differential effects of disruption and delay on perceptual learning" (2022, Attention Perception & Psychophysics)

Arthur G. Samuel has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, most notably:

  • Efthymia C. Kapnoula (7 collaborations)
  • Melissa M. Baese-Berk (3 collaborations)
  • Martijn Baart (3 collaborations)
  • Alice C. Harris (3 collaborations)
  • Angela de Bruin (2 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • Generalization in perceptual learning for speech

    Tanya Kraljic;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?

    Tanya Kraljic;Arthur G. Samuel

  • The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants

    Meghan Sumner;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers

    Tanya Kraljic;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.

    Unknown

  • Perceptual learning for speech.

    Arthur G. Samuel;Tanya Kraljic

  • Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words

    Laura Leach;Arthur G. Samuel

  • First Impressions and Last Resorts How Listeners Adjust to Speaker Variability

    Tanya Kraljic;Arthur G. Samuel;Susan E. Brennan

  • Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

    Arthur G. Samuel;Donna Kat

  • Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized.

    Siyun Liu;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Accommodating Variation: Dialects, Idiolects, and Speech Processing

    Tanya Kraljic;Susan E. Brennan;Arthur G. Samuel

  • The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words

    Stu Silverberg;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • Phonetic prototypes

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/

    Meghan Sumner;Arthur G. Samuel

  • The use of rhythm in attending to speech.

    Mark A. Pitt;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Knowing a Word Affects the Fundamental Perception of The Sounds Within it

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes

    Arthur G. Samuel

  • Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation

    Arthur G. Samuel;Mark A. Pitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Pitt
Mark A. Pitt The Ohio State University
Sven L. Mattys
Sven L. Mattys University of York
Susan E. Brennan
Susan E. Brennan Stony Brook University
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia Nebrija University
Douglas H. Whalen
Douglas H. Whalen Yale University
James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Ram Frost
Ram Frost Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David N. Rapp
David N. Rapp Northwestern University
Ken McRae
Ken McRae University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens the door to diverse online degree options and meaningful career pathways. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand across many cities. To help you get started, it’s important to know that every state and city may have its own unique education and certification requirements for counselors.

For example, aspiring professionals can review the comprehensive overview of Chesapeake substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local expectations. If you’re considering working in a major city, learning about the substance abuse counselor requirements in Chicago is essential. Each region, such as substance abuse counselor requirements in Chula Vista and substance abuse counselor requirements in Cincinnati, offers its own path to becoming certified.

With the flexibility of online degrees, students can tailor their learning to fulfill these specific requirements, preparing them for a rewarding role supporting individuals in their recovery journey. Exploring your city’s pathway is a crucial first step toward a meaningful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur G. Samuel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles