World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9669 5101 67 12066

James C. Johnston publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James C. Johnston between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James C. Johnston published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1992. 7 of the 77 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1992. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1973 2025

77 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James C. Johnston: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 5
1993 3
1994 4
1995 5
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 3
2025 4
Total 77
Download as CSV

James C. Johnston publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Johnston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 67
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James C. Johnston D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Johnston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James C. Johnston is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research is concentrated primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a focus on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Pharmacy, and General Health Professions.

The major topics addressed in Johnston's work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare, Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues, Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health, Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions, Advanced Causal Inference Techniques, Statistical Methods and Inference, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life.

Johnston has contributed to a variety of publication venues with notable frequency, including Neurologic Clinics, Medicine and Law, Clinical Ethics, Statistics in Biosciences, and the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.

  • Neurologic Clinics
  • Medicine and Law
  • Clinical Ethics
  • Statistics in Biosciences
  • Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

Some of the recent papers by Johnston are:

  • "Medical Malpractice and the Neurologist," 2023, published in Neurologic Clinics
  • "Medical Malpractice and the Neurologist: Specific Neurological Claims," 2023, published in Neurologic Clinics
  • "Benefits of Repeated Matched-Cohort and Nested Case-Control Analyses with Time-dependent Exposure in Observational Studies," 2024, published in Statistics in Biosciences (co-authored with Md. Belal Hossain)
  • "Electronic fetal monitoring in the twenty-first century: Language, logic and Lewis Carroll," 2020, published in Clinical Ethics (co-authored with Thomas P. Sartwelle)
  • "Cerebral palsy litigation after fifty years: A hoax on you," 2020, published in Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (co-authored with Thomas P. Sartwelle)

Frequent co-authors in Johnston's research include:

  • Thomas P. Sartwelle
  • Mehila Zebenigus
  • Md. Belal Hossain
  • Hubert Wong
  • Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Johnston's research encompasses a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical medicine with ethical, legal, and statistical perspectives, particularly within pediatric healthcare contexts and neurological specialties.

Best Publications

  • Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston

  • Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

    Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston;Steven Yantis

  • Attentional limitations in dual-task performance.

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston

  • On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks

    Steven Yantis;James C. Johnston

  • Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference

    Robert S. McCann;James C. Johnston

  • Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect

    M. Van Selst;E. Ruthruff;J. C. Johnston

  • Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention

    James C. Johnston;Robert S. McCann;Roger W. Remington

  • How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

    Eric Ruthruff;Mark Van Selst;James C. Johnston;Roger Remington

  • Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors

    Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Why practice reduces dual-task interference.

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst

  • Perception of letters in words: seek not and ye shall find.

    James C. Johnston;James L. McClelland

  • The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords

    James L. McClelland;James C. Johnston

  • Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification

    James C. Johnston;James L. McClelland

  • A test of the Sophisticated Guessing Theory of word perception

    James C Johnston

  • Visual factors in word perception

    James C. Johnston;James L. McClelland

  • Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst;Shelly Whitsell

  • On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.

    Unknown

  • Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception

    James C. Johnston;Harold Pashler

  • Attention and Performance

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Charles L. Folk
Charles L. Folk Villanova University
Steven Yantis
Steven Yantis Johns Hopkins University
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Elizabeth A. Franz
Elizabeth A. Franz University of Otago
Arthur G. Samuel
Arthur G. Samuel Stony Brook University
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degree programs and accelerated career options across the United States. Many universities now offer flexible online pathways, making it easier than ever to pursue your educational goals while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you are considering becoming a counselor, each state has unique requirements and opportunities. For example, Minnesota accelerated counseling programs allow students to complete their credentials faster through intensive coursework and condensed timelines. In Mississippi, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Mississippi can be achieved by enrolling in specific online graduate programs designed for speed and flexibility.

Similarly, Missouri fastest counseling programs provide a streamlined curriculum, enabling aspiring counselors to quickly meet state licensing requirements. For those in the Mountain West, Montana fastest counseling programs offer accelerated study tracks tailored for students eager to enter the workforce as efficiently as possible.

Whether you’re looking for flexible online degrees or the fastest route to a counseling career, these options make it easier to launch your journey in psychology across various states, each with their own unique offerings.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Johnston

Recently Published Articles