World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
9282
World Ranking
10347
National Ranking
5432

Charles L. Folk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Folk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charles L. Folk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Folk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles L. Folk is affiliated with Villanova University in the United States. Their research primarily contributes to the field of neuroscience, with a focused emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Their work also extends into related subfields including sensory systems, general decision sciences, epidemiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to neural and behavioral psychology studies, olfactory and sensory function studies, memory and neural mechanisms, visual perception and processing mechanisms, face recognition and perception, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and decision-making and behavioral economics.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Charles L. Folk include Roger W. Remington, Anne E. Mozel, Christina L. Master, Meltem İzzetoğlu, and Andrew B. Leber. These collaborations indicate a broad network spanning various interconnected research areas.

Their publications have appeared in several venues, notably:

  • Visual Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Charles L. Folk include:

  • "Distraction and Top-Down Attentional Control After Adolescent Concussion," 2022, Journal of Vision
  • "63 A Multimodal Investigation of Attention in Pediatric Concussion," 2023, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • "Themes and variations: A response to commentaries on Luck, et al. (2021)," 2021, Visual Cognition
  • "The attentional blink: A relational account of attentional engagement," 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate," 2020, Visual Cognition

Best Publications

  • Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;Joseph H. Wright

  • Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

    Charles L. Folk;Andrew B. Leber;Howard E. Egeth

  • Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

    Steven J. Luck;Nicholas Gaspelin;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.

    Unknown

  • Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention.

    Charles L. Folk;William J. Hoyer

  • Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Can new objects override attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.

    Jessica L. Irons;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

    Robert S. Mccann;Charles L. Folk;James C. Johnston

  • Contingent Attentional Capture by Conceptually Relevant Images.

    Brad Wyble;Charles L. Folk;Mary C. Potter

  • Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention

    Roger W. Remington;Charles L. Folk;John P. Mclean

  • The Role of Relational Information in Contingent Capture

    Stefanie I. Becker;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Attentional Capture Does Not Depend on Feature Similarity, but on Target-Nontarget Relations

    Stefanie I. Becker;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture

    Charles L. Folk;Andrew B. Leber;Howard E. Egeth

  • Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?

    Charles L. Folk;Brian A. Anderson

  • Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention

    Charles L. Folk;Susan Annett

  • Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model

    Brian A. Anderson;Charles L. Folk

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota
Howard E. Egeth
Howard E. Egeth Johns Hopkins University
James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
William J. Hoyer
William J. Hoyer Syracuse University
Brian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Steven J. Luck
Steven J. Luck University of California, Davis
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
Susan M. Courtney
Susan M. Courtney Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online Psychology degree can open doors to a variety of career pathways, including roles in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) due to the growing need for mental health professionals across the country.

The journey to licensure varies based on location. Each state has its own educational and certification requirements. For example, individuals interested in how to become an MFT in Spokane must complete specific state-approved coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, those curious about St. Louis mft certification requirements can expect a distinct set of criteria.

If you are considering how to become a marriage and family therapist in St. Petersburg or how to become an mft in Stockton, it is essential to review your state’s standards carefully. Online psychology programs can provide flexibility, but make sure they meet local and national accreditation and licensure requirements before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Charles L. Folk

Trending Scientists