World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10347 9686 5432 4960 71 9282

Charles L. Folk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles L. Folk between 1988 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles L. Folk published across 36 years, from 1988 to 2023, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2012. 2 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2012. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1988 2023

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles L. Folk: publications per year, 1988 to 2023
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 1
1994 6
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 2
2010 7
2011 0
2012 19
2013 5
2014 3
2015 3
2016 2
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Charles L. Folk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Folk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 71
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles L. Folk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Folk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles L. Folk is affiliated with Villanova University in the United States. Their research primarily contributes to the field of neuroscience, with a focused emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Their work also extends into related subfields including sensory systems, general decision sciences, epidemiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to neural and behavioral psychology studies, olfactory and sensory function studies, memory and neural mechanisms, visual perception and processing mechanisms, face recognition and perception, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and decision-making and behavioral economics.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Charles L. Folk include Roger W. Remington, Anne E. Mozel, Christina L. Master, Meltem İzzetoğlu, and Andrew B. Leber. These collaborations indicate a broad network spanning various interconnected research areas.

Their publications have appeared in several venues, notably:

  • Visual Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Charles L. Folk include:

  • "Distraction and Top-Down Attentional Control After Adolescent Concussion," 2022, Journal of Vision
  • "63 A Multimodal Investigation of Attention in Pediatric Concussion," 2023, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • "Themes and variations: A response to commentaries on Luck, et al. (2021)," 2021, Visual Cognition
  • "The attentional blink: A relational account of attentional engagement," 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate," 2020, Visual Cognition

Best Publications

  • Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;Joseph H. Wright

  • Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

    Charles L. Folk;Andrew B. Leber;Howard E. Egeth

  • Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

    Steven J. Luck;Nicholas Gaspelin;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.

    Unknown

  • Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention.

    Charles L. Folk;William J. Hoyer

  • Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Can new objects override attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.

    Jessica L. Irons;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

    Robert S. Mccann;Charles L. Folk;James C. Johnston

  • Contingent Attentional Capture by Conceptually Relevant Images.

    Brad Wyble;Charles L. Folk;Mary C. Potter

  • Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention

    Roger W. Remington;Charles L. Folk;John P. Mclean

  • The Role of Relational Information in Contingent Capture

    Stefanie I. Becker;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Attentional Capture Does Not Depend on Feature Similarity, but on Target-Nontarget Relations

    Stefanie I. Becker;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture

    Charles L. Folk;Andrew B. Leber;Howard E. Egeth

  • Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?

    Charles L. Folk;Brian A. Anderson

  • Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention

    Charles L. Folk;Susan Annett

  • Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model

    Brian A. Anderson;Charles L. Folk

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota
Howard E. Egeth
Howard E. Egeth Johns Hopkins University
James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
William J. Hoyer
William J. Hoyer Syracuse University
Brian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Steven J. Luck
Steven J. Luck University of California, Davis
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
Susan M. Courtney
Susan M. Courtney Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online Psychology degree can open doors to a variety of career pathways, including roles in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) due to the growing need for mental health professionals across the country.

The journey to licensure varies based on location. Each state has its own educational and certification requirements. For example, individuals interested in how to become an MFT in Spokane must complete specific state-approved coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, those curious about St. Louis mft certification requirements can expect a distinct set of criteria.

If you are considering how to become a marriage and family therapist in St. Petersburg or how to become an mft in Stockton, it is essential to review your state’s standards carefully. Online psychology programs can provide flexibility, but make sure they meet local and national accreditation and licensure requirements before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Charles L. Folk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles