World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5356 4971 2930 2656 192 14449

Roger W. Remington publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roger W. Remington between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roger W. Remington published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 4 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1972 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roger W. Remington: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 4
1993 1
1994 6
1995 2
1996 5
1997 3
1998 5
1999 2
2000 4
2001 6
2002 4
2003 7
2004 8
2005 9
2006 10
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 9
2011 8
2012 20
2013 16
2014 3
2015 9
2016 6
2017 9
2018 8
2019 8
2020 5
2021 6
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 212
Download as CSV

Roger W. Remington publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger W. Remington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roger W. Remington D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger W. Remington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roger W. Remington is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional areas of study include radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, family practice, and sensory systems.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Roger W. Remington has published in various academic venues, with recurrent contributions to:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Visual Cognition
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored, notable works include:

  • "Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate," 2020, Visual Cognition
  • "Perceptual learning in the identification of lung cancer in chest radiographs," 2020, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Do concerns about COVID-19 impair sustained attention?" 2021, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Redundancy gain in visual search of simulated X-ray images," 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for a dissociation between working memory capacity and feature-based attention," 2020, Cortex

The scientist frequently collaborates with a consistent group of coauthors, including:

  • Yi Ni Toh
  • Vanessa G. Lee
  • Jihyang Jun
  • Caitlin A. Sisk
  • Anna Grubert

Best Publications

  • Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;Joseph H. Wright

  • Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

    Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston;Steven Yantis

  • Moving attention through visual space.

    Gordon L. Shulman;Roger W. Remington;John P. McLean

  • Attention and saccadic eye movements.

    Roger W. Remington

  • Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

    Steven J. Luck;Nicholas Gaspelin;Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Moving attention - Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention

    Roger Remington;Leslie Pierce

  • The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.

    Unknown

  • Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention

    James C. Johnston;Robert S. McCann;Roger W. Remington

  • The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington

  • How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

    Eric Ruthruff;Mark Van Selst;James C. Johnston;Roger Remington

  • Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors

    Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and-or something else?

    George Papçun;Stephen Krashen;Dale Terbeek;Roger Remington

  • Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;Zachary Goodin;Roger W. Remington

  • Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

  • Modeling information navigation: implications for information architecture

    Craig S. Miller;Roger W. Remington

  • Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst;Shelly Whitsell

  • Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger W. Remington

  • Can new objects override attentional control settings

    Charles L. Folk;Roger Remington

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles L. Folk
Charles L. Folk Villanova University
Yuhong V. Jiang
Yuhong V. Jiang University of Minnesota
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
Bonnie E. John
Bonnie E. John IBM (United States)
Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Andrew Heathcote
Andrew Heathcote University of Newcastle Australia
Gernot Horstmann
Gernot Horstmann Bielefeld University
Richard L. Lewis
Richard L. Lewis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career paths. Prospective students can explore multiple specializations, such as clinical, counseling, or behavioral psychology. Each specialty offers unique opportunities to contribute to mental health, research, education, business, and more. Discover some of the psychology specialties that are shaping the industry and creating vital roles in today’s workforce.

If you are interested in helping people manage and overcome unhealthy behaviors, there are rewarding careers in behavioral psychology. These roles often involve working directly with individuals, schools, or organizations to implement strategies that promote positive behavioral change.

Graduates with advanced psychology degrees have a variety of options. Several career options after msc psychology include clinical research, mental health counseling, human resources, and more. However, not all paths lead directly to becoming a clinician.

If your goal is clinical practice, you may wonder: will a master's degree help you become a clinical psychologist? In the U.S., a doctoral degree is generally required for licensure as a clinical psychologist, but a master’s can lead to related professions and serve as a stepping stone for further study.

Best Scientists Citing Roger W. Remington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles