World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Ansorge

Ulrich Ansorge

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5386
World Ranking
8920
National Ranking
42

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5387
World Ranking
8590
National Ranking
53

Ulrich Ansorge publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Ansorge sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 219 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulrich Ansorge D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Ansorge sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Ansorge is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work focuses extensively on cognitive neuroscience, with contributions also spanning social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The research topics that Ulrich Ansorge has explored include

  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Color perception and design
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Face recognition and perception

Among recent publications, notable papers include

  • "Theta-Rhythmic Oscillation of Working Memory Performance" (2021) published in Psychological Science
  • "Testing the top-down contingent capture of attention for abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from cue-elicited N2pc" (2020) published in Psychophysiology
  • "Tracking visual search demands and memory load through pupil dilation" (2020) published in Journal of Vision
  • "The mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test" (2021) published in Psychological Research
  • "The influence of hatha yoga on stress, anxiety, and suppression: A randomized controlled trial" (2023) published in Acta Psychologica

Ulrich Ansorge regularly collaborates with a set of frequent coauthors, including

  • Ulrich Pomper
  • M. Stolte
  • Bence Szaszkó
  • Rebecca Rosa Schmid
  • Christian Büsel

Their research has been published repeatedly in several venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Psychophysiology
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Psychological Research

Best Publications

  • A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Peter Wuhr

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.

    Peter Wühr;Ulrich Ansorge

  • Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit

    Ulrich Ansorge;Helmut Leder

  • It felt fluent, and I liked it: subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking.

    Michael Forster;Helmut Leder;Ulrich Ansorge

  • Intentions Determine the Effect of Invisible Metacontrast-Masked Primes: Evidence for Top-Down Contingencies in a Peripheral Cuing Task

    Ulrich Ansorge;Odmar Neumann

  • Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Manfred Heumann

  • Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Werner Klotz;Odmar Neumann

  • Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing and conscious action control interact

    Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Wilfried Kunde;Markus Kiefer

  • A body-related dot-probe task reveals distinct attentional patterns for bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa.

    Jens Blechert;Ulrich Ansorge;Brunna Tuschen-Caffier

  • Controlling the Unconscious Attentional Task Sets Modulate Subliminal Semantic and Visuomotor Processes Differentially

    Ulla Martens;Ulrich Ansorge;Markus Kiefer

  • Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: evidence from perceptual latency priming.

    Ingrid Scharlau;Ulrich Ansorge

  • Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: evidence from event-related potentials.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Monika Kiss;Martin Eimer

  • The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: new ERP evidence.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Monika Kiss;Franziska Worschech;Martin Eimer

  • No conflict control in the absence of awareness.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Ulrich Ansorge;Isabella Fuchs;Shah Khalid;Wilfried Kunde

  • Spatial intention-response compatibility.

    Ulrich Ansorge

  • Testing the theory of embodied cognition with subliminal words.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Markus Kiefer;Shah Khalid;Sylvia Grassl

  • Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces.

    Christian Valuch;Lena S. Pflüger;Bernard Wallner;Bruno Laeng

  • More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search

    Gernot Horstmann;Ingrid Scharlau;Ulrich Ansorge

  • Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Manfred Heumann;Ingrid Scharlau

  • Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions.

    Ulrich Ansorge;Gernot Horstmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Leder
Helmut Leder University of Vienna
Gernot Horstmann
Gernot Horstmann Bielefeld University
Peter König
Peter König Osnabrück University
Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Dirk Kerzel
Dirk Kerzel University of Geneva
Markus Kiefer
Markus Kiefer University of Ulm
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Otmar Scherzer
Otmar Scherzer University of Vienna
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Bruno G. Breitmeyer University of Houston
Markus Bühner
Markus Bühner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a Neuroscience degree in the USA, exploring flexible study options can help you accelerate your career. Many students now choose 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online to enter the workforce faster or expand their expertise in less time. This online format provides convenience and flexibility for busy individuals or those balancing other commitments.

An important consideration is your potential return on investment. Neuroscience graduates often pursue diverse roles, some of which are among the highest earning degrees available. Other related disciplines in science and technology are also recognized as easiest college majors with high pay, making them attractive for students seeking a lucrative future.

For affordability, students should research institutions offering quality programs at lower tuition. Numerous colleges online that accept fafsa make it easier for eligible students to secure financial aid, which can significantly reduce costs.

By exploring your options, you can find a pathway that balances academic rigor, career potential, flexibility, and affordability—all critical factors in shaping your future in Neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Ansorge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles