World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno G. Breitmeyer

Bruno G. Breitmeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5178 4803 2847 2578 186 11812

Bruno G. Breitmeyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruno G. Breitmeyer between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruno G. Breitmeyer published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2006. 4 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2006. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications
1972 2024

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruno G. Breitmeyer: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 4
1976 3
1977 2
1978 5
1979 2
1980 4
1981 5
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 5
1990 3
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 5
2004 5
2005 7
2006 18
2007 5
2008 6
2009 4
2010 13
2011 9
2012 4
2013 6
2014 13
2015 5
2016 6
2017 3
2018 4
2019 3
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
Total 195
Download as CSV

Bruno G. Breitmeyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno G. Breitmeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 186
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bruno G. Breitmeyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno G. Breitmeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bruno G. Breitmeyer is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Their work explores visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and the impact of light on the environment and health. Additional topics covered in their research include color perception and design, tactile and sensory interactions, multisensory perception and integration, as well as aesthetic perception and analysis.

The main fields of study associated with Breitmeyer's work include:

  • Neuroscience

More specific subfields of study are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Speech and Hearing

Bruno G. Breitmeyer has published extensively across several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Vision
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology

Some recent research papers by Breitmeyer and collaborators are:

  • "Examining Increment thresholds as a function of pedestal contrast under hypothetical parvo- and magnocellular-biased conditions," 2023, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "Temporal Aspects of Visual Perception and Cognition," 2022, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • "Further Examination of the Pulsed- and Steady-Pedestal Paradigms under Hypothetical Parvocellular- and Magnocellular-Biased Conditions," 2024, Vision
  • "Significance and implications of visual shape processing at intermediate cortical levels," 2022, Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • "Visual Memory Scan Slopes: Their Changes over the First Two Seconds of Processing," 2021, Vision

Collaborations have been an integral part of Breitmeyer's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jaeseon Song
  • James M. Brown
  • Haluk Öĝmen
  • Jane Jacob
  • Melissa Treviño

Best Publications

  • Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Leo Ganz

  • Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer

  • Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Haluk Ogmen

  • Visual Masking: Time Slices through Conscious and Unconscious Vision

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Haluk Öğmen

  • Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements.

    B. Fischer;B. Breitmeyer

  • Unmasking visual masking: a look at the "why" behind the veil of the "how".

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer

  • Backward Masking Performance in Unaffected Siblings of Schizophrenic Patients: Evidence for a Vulnerability Indicator

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Bruno Breitmeyer

  • The existence and role of retinotopic and spatiotopic forms of visual persistence

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Walter Kropfl;Bela Julesz

  • Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing.

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer

  • Visual masking: past accomplishments, present status, future developments.

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer

  • Backward Masking in Unmedicated Schizophrenic Patients in Psychotic Remission: Possible Reflection of Aberrant Cortical Oscillation

    Michael Foster Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Bruno Breitmeyer;Jim Mintz

  • Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels.

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Mary C. Williams

  • The what and where in visual masking.

    Haluk Ogmen;Bruno G Breitmeyer;Reginald Melvin

  • Unconscious Color Priming Occurs at Stimulus- Not Percept-Dependent Levels of Processing

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Tony Ro;Neel S. Singhal

  • The role of on and off transients in determining the psychophysical spatial frequency response.

    Bruno Breitmeyer;Bela Julesz

  • Binocular-disparity-dependent upper-lower hemifield anisotropy and left-right hemifield isotropy as revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.

    Bela Julesz;Bruno Breitmeyer;Walter Kropfl

  • Relationship between directed visual attention and saccadic reaction times

    Unknown

  • Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms.

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer;Hulusi Kafalıgönül;Haluk Öğmen;Lynn Mardon

  • Problems with the psychophysics of intention

    Bruno G. Breitmeyer

  • Unconscious priming by color and form: different processes and levels.

    Bruno G Breitmeyer;Haluk Ogmen;Jian Chen

  • Visual masking as a probe for abnormal gamma range activity in schizophrenia.

    Michael Foster Green;Michael Foster Green;Jim Mintz;Jim Mintz;Dustin Salveson;Keith H Nuechterlein

  • The neuropsychology of anxiety.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Green
Michael F. Green University of California, Los Angeles
Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jonathan K. Wynn
Jonathan K. Wynn University of California, Los Angeles
Tony Ro
Tony Ro City University of New York
Bela Julesz
Bela Julesz Nokia (United States)
Marco Iacoboni
Marco Iacoboni University of California, Los Angeles
Ulrich Ansorge
Ulrich Ansorge University of Vienna
Gregory A. Light
Gregory A. Light University of California, San Diego
Gerhard Hellemann
Gerhard Hellemann University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens many doors in the rapidly growing field of mental health. Online psychology programs are especially popular, offering flexibility and accessibility for students nationwide. These degrees often prepare graduates for diverse roles, including mental health counseling, research, and clinical support.

If you are interested in becoming a mental health counselor, it's important to understand the educational and certification requirements in different regions. For example, see the Detroit mental health counselor education requirements or explore the steps needed to become a mental health counselor in Durham. Regional differences can impact licensing, supervised practice hours, and even specific coursework.

In other cities, such as El Paso, you should review the El Paso mental health counselor certification requirements to ensure you meet all local standards. Similarly, understanding the Fort Wayne mental health counselor education requirements can help you plan your educational journey with confidence.

No matter your location, gaining the right qualifications through accredited online degrees is a crucial first step toward a rewarding career in psychology and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno G. Breitmeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles