World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14522
World Ranking
4353
National Ranking
469

John M. Findlay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Findlay sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Findlay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Findlay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Findlay is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. The research work spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on medicine and agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's publication record includes research in prominent venues such as Diseases of the Esophagus and Journal of Extension. Their recent scholarly contributions include:

  • Results of the ARROW survey of anti-reflux practice in the United Kingdom (2023), published in Diseases of the Esophagus
  • Developing Economic Injury Levels for Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) in Idaho Alfalfa Under Controlled Pest Populations (2024), published in Journal of Extension

John M. Findlay has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Natalie Blencowe
  • Andrew Currie
  • Marianne Hollyman
  • Sheraz R. Markar
  • Tim Underwood

The scientist's research areas encompass a combination of clinical and agricultural studies. Main fields of study are:

  • Medicine
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within those fields, subfields of study include:

  • Surgery
  • Insect Science
  • Gastroenterology
  • Plant Science

The major topics addressed in their work include:

  • Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology
  • Insect and pesticide research
  • Insect-plant interactions and control
  • Agricultural pest management studies

Best Publications

  • Saccadic eye movements and cognition

    Simon Paul Liversedge;John M. Findlay

  • A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

    John M. Findlay;Robin Walker

  • Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing

    John M. Findlay;Iain D. Gilchrist

  • The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention.

    Martin Shepherd;John M. Findlay;Robert J. Hockey

  • Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

    John M. Findlay

  • Eye movement strategies involved in face perception.

    Gail J Walker-Smith;Alastair G Gale;John M Findlay

  • Saccade target selection during visual search.

    John M. Findlay

  • Effect of Remote Distractors on Saccade Programming: Evidence for an Extended Fixation Zone

    Robin Walker;Heiner Deubel;Werner X. Schneider;John M. Findlay

  • Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder

    S. Fletcher-Watson;S.R. Leekam;Valerie Benson;M.C. Frank

  • Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene.

    Sue Fletcher-Watson;John M Findlay;Susan R Leekam;Valerie Benson

  • Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention

    Hermann J. Müller;John M. Findlay

  • Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?

    M G Wenban-Smith;J M Findlay

  • Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications

    John M. Findlay;Robin Walker;Robert W. Kentridge

  • Yarbus, eye movements, and vision

    Benjamin W Tatler;Nicholas J Wade;Hoi Kwan;John M Findlay

  • The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.

    Hermann J. Müller;John M. Findlay

  • Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies

    R. Walker;R. W. Kentridge;J. M. Findlay

  • Estimates on probability functions: . A more virulent PEST

    J. M. Findlay

  • Spatial and temporal factors in the predictive generation of saccadic eye movements

    John M. Findlay

  • Eye movements when reading disappearing text: Is there a gap effect in reading?

    Simon Paul Liversedge;Keith. Rayner;Sarah.J. White;Dorine. Vergilino-Perez;Dorine. Vergilino-Perez

  • Saccade target selection in visual search: the effect of information from the previous fixation

    John M Findlay;Valerie Brown;Iain D Gilchrist

  • The rhythm of the eyes: Overt and covert attentional pointing

    John M. Findlay;Valerie Brown;Iain D. Gilchrist

Frequent Co-Authors

Iain D. Gilchrist
Iain D. Gilchrist University of Bristol
Simon Paul Liversedge
Simon Paul Liversedge University of Central Lancashire
Susan R. Leekam
Susan R. Leekam Cardiff University
Sue Fletcher-Watson
Sue Fletcher-Watson University of Edinburgh
Sarah J. White
Sarah J. White University of Leicester
Charles A. Heywood
Charles A. Heywood Durham University
Robert W. Kentridge
Robert W. Kentridge Durham University
Fiona N. Newell
Fiona N. Newell Trinity College Dublin
Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Alan Slater
Alan Slater University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a wide range of online study and career possibilities, especially in mental health counseling. Online psychology programs can lay the groundwork for licensure and certifications required in various regions across the USA. Aspiring counselors must often meet specific requirements that differ from state to state or even city to city.

For example, if you're interested in practicing in Arizona, it's important to understand Tucson mental health counselor certification requirements. Similarly, those considering Oklahoma should review the mental health counselor requirements in Tulsa. In Virginia, local standards are outlined for those who want to become a mental health counselor in Virginia Beach. For those aiming to practice in the nation’s capital, there are unique steps on how to become a mental health counselor in Washington DC.

Researching local certification and education requirements is essential for anyone considering an online psychology degree. It ensures you are prepared for the credentialing process and aware of the pathways open to you in the city or state where you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Findlay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles