World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3260 3004 350 332 163 12703

Alan Slater publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan Slater between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan Slater published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2011. 2 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2011. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1972 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan Slater: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 3
1984 3
1985 4
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 3
1998 4
1999 4
2000 6
2001 4
2002 7
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 3
2007 7
2008 7
2009 6
2010 10
2011 11
2012 6
2013 9
2014 11
2015 1
2016 2
2017 4
2018 0
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 166
Download as CSV

Alan Slater publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Slater sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 163
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan Slater D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Slater sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan Slater is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields and subfields within psychology and medicine, with a focus on areas related to mental health, developmental psychology, and cognitive processes.

The main fields of study in Slater's work include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their research covers several subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Slater's research topics are diverse, addressing both clinical and developmental issues. Major topics in their body of work are:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis

Their recent publications demonstrate these interests with a range of research articles, including:

  • Critical Response IV: This Photo Does Not Exist: Generativity and the AI Gaze, 2024, Critical Inquiry
  • Pharmacological therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy, augmentation and head-to-head approaches, 2021, European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Pharmacological-assisted Psychotherapy for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Orientation Effects in the Development of Linear Object Tracking in Early Infancy, 2020, Child Development
  • Eye tracking provides no evidence that young infants understand path obstruction, 2021, Infant Behavior and Development

Slater has published multiple papers in several prominent venues. The most frequent publication sources are:

  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Critical Inquiry
  • Child Development
  • Infant Behavior and Development
  • BJPsych Open

Their collaboration network includes frequent coauthors such as:

  • Mathew Hoskins
  • Robert Sinnerton
  • Anna Nakamura
  • Jack F. G. Underwood
  • Liam Clarke

Alan Slater's work reflects a multidisciplinary approach, combining clinical research with developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Their contributions cover both theoretical analyses and applied research, particularly in the understanding and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and developmental cognitive functions.

Best Publications

  • The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy Evidence of Perceptual Narrowing

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female

    Paul C Quinn;Joshua Yahr;Abbie Kuhn;Alan M Slater

  • Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • Preverbal Infants’ Sensitivity to Synaesthetic Cross-Modality Correspondences

    Peter Walker;J. Gavin Bremner;Ursula Mason;Joanne Spring

  • Newborn infants prefer attractive faces

    Alan Slater;Charlotte Von der Schulenburg;Elizaabeth Brown;Marion Badenoch

  • Development of the other-race effect during infancy: Evidence toward universality?

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Kang Lee;Paul C. Quinn

  • Cross-Race Preferences for Same-Race Faces Extend Beyond the African Versus Caucasian Contrast in 3-Month-Old Infants.

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Liezhong Ge;Paul C. Quinn

  • Size constancy at birth: newborn infants' responses to retinal and real size

    Alan Slater;Anne Mattock;Elizabeth Brown

  • Newborn and older infants' perception of partly occluded objects☆

    Alan Slater;Victoria Morison;Marcia Somers;Anne Mattock

  • Assessing emotion recognition in 9-15-years olds: preliminary analysis of abilities in reading emotion from faces, voices and eyes.

    James Tonks;W Huw Williams;Ian Frampton;Phil Yates

  • Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race.

    Gizelle Anzures;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis;Alan M. Slater

  • Perceptual training prevents the emergence of the other race effect during infancy.

    Michelle Heron-Delaney;Gizelle Anzures;Jane S. Herbert;Paul C. Quinn

  • Developmental Origins of the Other-Race Effect:

    Gizelle Anzures;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis;Alan M. Slater

  • Newborn Infants' Preference for Attractive Faces: The Role of Internal and External Facial Features

    Alan Slater;Gavin Bremner;Scott P. Johnson;Penny Sherwood

  • Two faces of the other-race effect: recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces.

    Liezhong Ge;Hongchuan Zhang;Zhe Wang;Paul C Quinn

  • Visual deficits in children born at less than 32 weeks' gestation with and without major ocular pathology and cerebral damage.

    H J Dowdeswell;A M Slater;J Broomhall;J Tripp

  • Shape constancy and slant perception at birth.

    Alan Slater;Victoria Morison

  • Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task.

    Britta Osthaus;Stephen E. G. Lea;Alan M. Slater

  • Intermodal perception at birth: Intersensory redundancy guides newborn infants’ learning of arbitrary auditory−visual pairings

    Alan Slater;Paul C. Quinn;Elizabeth Brown;Rachel Hayes

  • Brief daily exposures to Asian females reverses perceptual narrowing for Asian faces in Caucasian infants

    Gizelle Anzures;Andrea Wheeler;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis

  • Infant preference for female faces occurs for same- but not other-race faces.

    Paul C. Quinn;Lesley Uttley;Kang Lee;Alan Gibson

  • Infant Development: Recent Advances

    J. Gavin Bremner;Alan Slater;George Butterworth

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Olivier Pascalis
Olivier Pascalis Grenoble Alpes University
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Scott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
David J. Kelly
David J. Kelly University of Sheffield
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
Stephen E. G. Lea
Stephen E. G. Lea University of Exeter
John M. Findlay
John M. Findlay Durham University
Marc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein National Institutes of Health
David J. Lewkowicz
David J. Lewkowicz Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career paths, especially for those interested in mental health counseling. One popular option is pursuing licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), which allows graduates to provide therapy and support to individuals and communities.

Licensure requirements differ by state, so it’s important to review the specific criteria for your chosen location. For example, you can find detailed Pennsylvania lpc licensure requirements, which outline key educational and supervised experience standards. Similarly, understanding the Rhode Island lpc licensure requirements is critical if you plan to practice there.

Students interested in the southeastern USA can learn more about how to get an lpc license in South Carolina, including steps for supervised clinical practice and exams. Those looking into the Midwest or Plains may want to explore how to get an lpc license in South Dakota, which covers distinct coursework and internship guidelines.

With a Psychology degree from a U.S. institution and meeting state-specific licensing requirements, graduates can pursue impactful careers in mental health, counseling, and community support roles—many of which can be started or advanced through online programs.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Slater

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles