World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3409 3144 1919 1730 215 12739

Scott P. Johnson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott P. Johnson between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott P. Johnson published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2010. 9 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2010. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1994 2025

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott P. Johnson: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 5
1997 5
1998 8
1999 1
2000 5
2001 3
2002 6
2003 6
2004 4
2005 5
2006 4
2007 7
2008 9
2009 7
2010 20
2011 10
2012 13
2013 12
2014 12
2015 11
2016 7
2017 9
2018 14
2019 7
2020 13
2021 11
2022 10
2023 8
2024 4
2025 5
Total 244
Download as CSV

Scott P. Johnson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott P. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 215 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 215
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott P. Johnson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott P. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott P. Johnson is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant emphasis on developmental and educational psychology. Additionally, they work in cognitive neuroscience, education, surgery, and automotive engineering.

Their research topics notably include child and animal learning development, language development and disorders, autism spectrum disorder research, spatial cognition and navigation, face recognition and perception, early childhood education and development, and genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Johnson has contributed to publications in a variety of journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Cognition
  • Infant Behavior and Development
  • Infancy
  • Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • Child Development

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on infancy research, autism biomarkers, and neural network models for learning. Notable works include:

  • "Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference," 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT): Scientific Context, Study Design, and Progress Toward Biomarker Qualification," 2020, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • "The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials: evaluation of a battery of candidate eye-tracking biomarkers for use in autism clinical trials," 2022, Molecular Autism
  • "Biomarker Acquisition and Quality Control for Multi-Site Studies: The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials," 2020, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • "When forgetting fosters learning: A neural network model for statistical learning," 2021, Cognition

Scott P. Johnson has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Shafali Jeste
  • Damla Şentürk
  • James C. McPartland
  • Géraldine Dawson
  • Susan Faja

Best Publications

  • Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism

    Natasha Z Kirkham;Jonathan A Slemmer;Scott P Johnson

  • Systems in development: motor skill acquisition facilitates three-dimensional object completion.

    Kasey C. Soska;Karen E. Adolph;Scott P. Johnson

  • Development of Infants' Attention to Faces during the First Year.

    Michael C. Frank;Edward Vul;Scott P. Johnson

  • Preverbal Infants’ Sensitivity to Synaesthetic Cross-Modality Correspondences

    Peter Walker;J. Gavin Bremner;Ursula Mason;Joanne Spring

  • Mental Rotation in Human Infants: A Sex Difference

    David S. Moore;Scott P. Johnson

  • Eye Tracking in Infancy Research

    Gustaf Gredebäck;Scott Johnson;Claes von Hofsten

  • The Broader Autism Phenotype in Infancy: When Does It Emerge?

    Sally J Ozonoff;Gregory S. Young;Ashleigh Belding;Monique Hill

  • Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant.

    Hermann Bulf;Scott P. Johnson;Eloisa Valenza

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm

    Scott P. Johnson;Dima Amso;Jonathan A. Slemmer

  • Perception of object unity in 2-month-old infants.

    Scott P. Johnson;Richard N. Aslin

  • Infants Use Meter to Categorize Rhythms and Melodies: Implications for Musical Structure Learning.

    Erin E. Hannon;Scott P. Johnson

  • Infant Rule Learning Facilitated by Speech

    Gary F. Marcus;Keith J. Fernandes;Scott P. Johnson

  • 18-Month Predictors of Later Outcomes in Younger Siblings of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Baby Siblings Research Consortium Study

    Katarzyna Chawarska;Frederick Shic;Suzanne Macari;Daniel J. Campbell

  • Perception of object unity in young infants: The roles of motion, depth, and orientation

    Scott P Johnson;Richard N Aslin

  • Newborn Infants' Preference for Attractive Faces: The Role of Internal and External Facial Features

    Alan Slater;Gavin Bremner;Scott P. Johnson;Penny Sherwood

  • Where Infants Look Determines How They See: Eye Movements and Object Perception Performance in 3-Month-Olds

    Scott P. Johnson;Jonathan A. Slemmer;Dima Amso

  • Location, location, location : Development of spatiotemporal sequence learning in infancy

    Natasha Z. Kirkham;Jonathan A. Slemmer;Daniel C. Richardson;Scott P. Johnson

  • Visual search and attention to faces during early infancy.

    Michael C. Frank;Dima Amso;Scott P. Johnson

  • Memory Constraints on Infants' Cross-Situational Statistical Learning.

    Haley A. Vlach;Scott P. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Slater
Alan Slater University of Exeter
Dima Amso
Dima Amso Columbia University
Ted Hutman
Ted Hutman University of California, Los Angeles
Natasha Z. Kirkham
Natasha Z. Kirkham Birkbeck, University of London
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
Gary F. Marcus
Gary F. Marcus New York University
Kerri L. Johnson
Kerri L. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Kristen Gillespie-Lynch
Kristen Gillespie-Lynch The Graduate Center, CUNY
Raphael Bernier
Raphael Bernier University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a wide network of online degree options and evolving career pathways. Many universities now offer flexible psychology programs designed to accommodate busy lifestyles, allowing students to learn at their own pace and location. These programs often blend rigorous academic theory with practical skills development, preparing graduates for roles in healthcare, education, business, and counseling.

When considering your options, it's important to focus on value and long-term career prospects. For example, the most valuable psychology programs in Jacksonville are recognized for strong graduate outcomes and affordability. Similarly, the most valuable psychology programs in New Jersey provide a balance of cost, quality, and career support services to help launch your psychology career.

In major cities, finding top-rated options is easier than ever. The most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New York highlights institutions known for cutting-edge research and alumni success. For those seeking affordability and career readiness in the Southwest, the best value psychology degrees in Phoenix showcase programs with a strong return on investment.

Ultimately, choosing an online psychology degree is about aligning your educational investment with your goals—ensuring the path you take leads to a fulfilling and in-demand career.

Best Scientists Citing Scott P. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles