World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4924 4564 35 32 104 14623

Ram Frost publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ram Frost between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ram Frost published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1992. 4 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1992. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ram Frost: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 4
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 7
1993 2
1994 1
1995 4
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 0
2000 5
2001 3
2002 0
2003 4
2004 1
2005 6
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 4
2014 2
2015 7
2016 1
2017 4
2018 3
2019 7
2020 4
2021 4
2022 3
2023 3
2024 2
2025 2
Total 113
Download as CSV

Ram Frost publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ram Frost sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ram Frost D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ram Frost sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ram Frost is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, including psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. Within these broader domains, their work focuses on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, signal processing, and statistics and probability.

The main topics addressed in their research include reading and literacy development, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, language development and disorders, neural networks and applications, blind source separation techniques, text readability and simplification, and second language acquisition and learning.

Ram Frost has contributed to various scholarly publications, frequently collaborating with several co-authors. Among their frequent collaborators are Noam Siegelman, Louisa Bogaerts, Jay G. Rueckl, Morten H. Christiansen, and Sascha Schroeder.

They have published multiple papers in notable academic venues. These include:

  • Expanding horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The Multilingual Eye-movement Corpus (MECO), 2022, Behavior Research Methods
  • Text reading in English as a second language: Evidence from the Multilingual Eye-Movements Corpus, 2022, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • Statistical Learning and Language Impairments: Toward More Precise Theoretical Accounts, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Is there such a thing as a 'good statistical learner'?, 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Beta-Band Activity Is a Signature of Statistical Learning, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Their work is also published frequently in venues including Behavior Research Methods, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Best Publications

  • The reading process is different for different orthographies : the orthographic depth hypothesis

    Leonard Katz;Ram Frost

  • Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails

    Ram Frost

  • Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

    Ram Frost;Leonard Katz;Shlomo Bentin

  • Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew–English bilinguals.

    Tamar H. Gollan;Kenneth I. Forster;Ram Frost

  • Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning

    Ram Frost;Ram Frost;Blair Armstrong;Noam Siegelman;Morten Hyllekvist Christiansen;Morten Hyllekvist Christiansen;Morten Hyllekvist Christiansen

  • What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

    Ram Frost;Kenneth I. Forster;Avital Deutsch

  • Towards a Universal Model of Reading

    Ram Frost

  • Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning

    Ram Frost;Leonard Katz

  • The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition

    Manuel Carreiras;Blair C. Armstrong;Manuel Perea;Ram Frost

  • Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence

    Noam Siegelman;Ram Frost

  • Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew

    Avital Deutsch;Ram Frost;Kenneth I. Forster

  • Statistical learning research: A critical review and possible new directions.

    Ram Frost;Blair C. Armstrong;Morten H. Christiansen

  • Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography

    Ram Frost

  • Universal brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting languages

    Jay G. Rueckl;Jay G. Rueckl;Pedro M. Paz-Alonso;Peter J. Molfese;Peter J. Molfese;Wen Jui Kuo

  • Orthographic Systems and Skilled Word Recognition Processes in Reading

    Ram Frost

  • Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.

    Ram Frost;Avital Deutsch;Orna Gilboa;Michal Tannenbaum

  • Measuring individual differences in statistical learning: Current pitfalls and possible solutions

    Noam Siegelman;Louisa Bogaerts;Ram Frost;Ram Frost

  • What Predicts Successful Literacy Acquisition in a Second Language

    Ram Frost;Noam Siegelman;Alona Narkiss;Liron Afek

  • Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language

    Ram Frost;Tamar Kugler;Avital Deutsch;Kenneth I. Forster

  • Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning.

    Noam Siegelman;Louisa Bogaerts;Morten H. Christiansen;Ram Frost

  • Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology.

    Ram Frost;Avital Deutsch;Kenneth I. Forster

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
Manuel Carreiras
Manuel Carreiras Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Shlomo Bentin
Shlomo Bentin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Kenneth I. Forster
Kenneth I. Forster University of Arizona
Bruno H. Repp
Bruno H. Repp Haskins Laboratories
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University
Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Alexander Pollatsek
Alexander Pollatsek University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Many students pursue online degrees due to their flexibility, which allows them to balance work, family, and studies. Popular career options include counseling, social work, and therapy, each with distinct educational and licensing requirements.

Becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) is a common route. Licensing requirements differ by location, so it's crucial to understand what's required in your state or city. For instance, those interested in practicing in Boston can reference the Boston mft certification requirements. Similarly, if you're considering Buffalo, be sure to review the mft requirements in Buffalo.

Different states and cities may set unique prerequisites, such as supervised clinical hours and specific coursework. To better understand the steps, consult resources like how to become a marriage and family therapist in Chandler and how to become an mft in Charlotte. Researching these local requirements helps ensure that your online psychology degree aligns with your career goals and target location.

Best Scientists Citing Ram Frost

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles