World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
20922
World Ranking
1718
National Ranking
1014

Bruno H. Repp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno H. Repp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 269 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruno H. Repp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno H. Repp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno H. Repp is affiliated with Haskins Laboratories in the United States. The scientist's professional contributions are primarily situated within this research institution.

There is no publicly available information about recent papers authored by Bruno H. Repp, nor details about frequent co-authors. Likewise, no specific data exists concerning publication venues frequently used by this scientist.

No book publications or identified publishers are associated with Bruno H. Repp. Similarly, there is no information on main fields or subfields of study, nor on the main topics that characterize their research work.

The record does not indicate any awards won by Bruno H. Repp. Additionally, there is no information suggesting the scientist is deceased, which implies current professional activity or at least no official record to the contrary.

Best Publications

  • Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012)

    Bruno H. Repp;Yi-Huang Su

  • Phonetic trading relations and context effects : new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction

    Virginia A. Mann;Bruno H. Repp

  • Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.

    Bruno H Repp;Amandine Penel

  • Diversity and commonality in music performance: An analysis of timing microstructure in Schumann’s ‘‘Träumerei’’

    Bruno H. Repp

  • The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat.

    Aniruddh D. Patel;John R. Iversen;Yanqing Chen;Bruno H. Repp

  • Top-Down Control of Rhythm Perception Modulates Early Auditory Responses

    John R. Iversen;Bruno H. Repp;Aniruddh D. Patel

  • Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms

    Bruno H. Repp;Amandine Penel

  • Sensorimotor synchronization and perception of timing: effects of music training and task experience.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization.

    Peter E. Keller;Günther Knoblich;Günther Knoblich;Bruno H. Repp;Bruno H. Repp

  • Rate Limits in Sensorimotor Synchronization With Auditory and Visual Sequences: The Synchronization Threshold and the Benefits and Costs of Interval Subdivision

    Bruno H Repp

  • Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception

    Virginia A. Mann;Bruno H. Repp

  • Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllable-initial stop consonants.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: effects of intention, attention, and awareness.

    Bruno H. Repp;Peter E. Keller

  • Probing the cognitive representation of musical time: structural constraints on the perception of timing perturbations.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Tapping to a Very Slow Beat: A Comparison of Musicians and Nonmusicians

    Bruno H. Repp;Rebecca Doggett

  • Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization.

    Bruno H. Repp

  • Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.

    Bruno H. Repp;Alvin M. Liberman;Thomas Eccardt;David Pesetsky

  • Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch

    Bruno H. Repp;Carol L. Krumhansl

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter E. Keller
Peter E. Keller University of Sydney
Günther Knoblich
Günther Knoblich Central European University
Virginia A. Mann
Virginia A. Mann University of California, Irvine
Robert G. Crowder
Robert G. Crowder Yale University
Aniruddh D. Patel
Aniruddh D. Patel Tufts University
Alice F. Healy
Alice F. Healy University of Colorado Boulder
Ram Frost
Ram Frost Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Alvin M. Liberman
Alvin M. Liberman Haskins Laboratories
Shlomo Bentin
Shlomo Bentin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Merav Ahissar
Merav Ahissar Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a psychology degree, exploring related fields like social work can open more career pathways. Social work and psychology often overlap when it comes to helping individuals, families, and communities cope with life’s challenges. Both fields value empathy, analytical thinking, and an understanding of human behavior.

Online social work programs are a flexible and increasingly popular choice. They provide the knowledge needed for meaningful jobs while allowing you to study from home. Cost is a key factor for many students. For example, you can find the cheapest social work programs in Indiana or explore affordable social work degrees in Kansas to keep your education budget-friendly.

Students in Arkansas may be interested in the cheapest social work programs in Little Rock, while those in the Northeast should review affordable social work degrees in Massachusetts for local options. These programs offer a foundation for careers in counseling, community outreach, or mental health services and can complement your studies in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno H. Repp

Recently Published Articles