World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline Palmer

Caroline Palmer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
8968
World Ranking
5266
National Ranking
353

Caroline Palmer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Palmer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Caroline Palmer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Palmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caroline Palmer is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and psychology, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. Their work often explores the intersections of neuroscience and music perception, neural dynamics and brain function, as well as action observation and synchronization.

Their recent publications highlight a concentration on brain function related to music and synchronization. Notable papers include:

  • Can electroencephalography (EEG) identify ADHD subtypes? A systematic review (2022), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Rhythm Complexity Modulates Behavioral and Neural Dynamics During Auditory-Motor Synchronization (2020), published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral and Neural Dynamics of Interpersonal Synchrony Between Performing Musicians: A Wireless EEG Hyperscanning Study (2021), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Are We in Time? How Predictive Coding and Dynamical Systems Explain Musical Synchrony (2022), published in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Endogenous rhythms influence musicians' and non-musicians' interpersonal synchrony (2022), published in Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Caroline Palmer include Alexander P. Demos, Valentin Bégel, Shannon Wright, Ella Sahlas, and Rebecca Scheurich.

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in several journals, with multiple contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Caroline Palmer has also contributed to academic book publishing, authoring a work titled Physiological Influences of Music in Perception and Action published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.

Their scientific investigations cover a range of topics frequently addressed in their work, including:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Music and Audio Processing

This profile reflects Caroline Palmer's interdisciplinary research that integrates neuroscience, psychology, and music cognition, contributing to understanding brain mechanisms related to perception and synchronization within social and musical contexts.

Best Publications

  • Mental representations for musical meter.

    Caroline Palmer;Carol L. Krumhansl

  • Mapping musical thought to musical performance

    Caroline Palmer

  • Perceiving temporal regularity in music

    Edward W. Large;Caroline Palmer

  • Synchronization of Timing and Motion Among Performing Musicians

    Werner Goebl;Caroline Palmer

  • Skill acquisition in music performance: relations between planning and temporal control.

    Carolyn Drake;Caroline Palmer

  • Action-based effects on music perception

    Pieter-Jan Maes;Marc Leman;Caroline Palmer;Marcelo M. Wanderley

  • Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases.

    Caroline Palmer;Carol L. Krumhansl

  • Accent structures in music performance.

    Carolyn Drake;Caroline Palmer

  • Born to dance but beat deaf: A new form of congenital amusia

    Jessica Phillips-Silver;Petri Toiviainen;Nathalie Gosselin;Olivier Piché

  • Incremental planning in sequence production.

    Caroline Palmer;Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity

    Caroline Palmer;Carol L. Krumhansl

  • Anatomy of a Performance: Sources of Musical Expression

    Caroline Palmer

  • Effects of Auditory and Motor Mental Practice in Memorized Piano Performance

    Zebulon Highben;Caroline Palmer

  • Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: sound evidence for an encoding effect

    Steven A. Finney;Caroline Palmer

  • Conceptual and Motor Learning in Music Performance

    Caroline Palmer;Rosalee K. Meyer

  • Units of knowledge in music performance.

    Caroline Palmer;Carla van de Sande

  • On the Assignment of Structure in Music Performance

    Caroline Palmer

  • Linguistic prosody and musical meter in song

    Caroline Palmer;Michael H Kelly

  • Temporal coordination between performing musicians

    Janeen D. Loehr;Caroline Palmer

  • Development of gene expression markers of acute heat-light stress in reef-building corals of the genus Porites.

    Carly D. Kenkel;Galina Aglyamova;Ada Alamaru;Ranjeet Bhagooli

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Q. Pfordresher
Peter Q. Pfordresher University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Marcelo M. Wanderley
Marcelo M. Wanderley McGill University
Isabelle Peretz
Isabelle Peretz University of Montreal
John C. Bythell
John C. Bythell Newcastle University
Bette L. Willis
Bette L. Willis James Cook University
Terrie E. Inder
Terrie E. Inder Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bernhard Ross
Bernhard Ross University of Toronto
Carol L. Krumhansl
Carol L. Krumhansl Cornell University
William Forde Thompson
William Forde Thompson Bond University
William J. Gehring
William J. Gehring University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a wide range of career opportunities, especially in fields that combine mental health, support services, and community engagement. One of the most closely related pathways is social work, an area with growing demand nationwide. Many students with a background in psychology find social work careers both rewarding and impactful.

For those interested in this field, considering affordability is crucial. There are several affordable social work programs in Chicago, offering flexible online and campus options. If you’re located in Ohio, you can explore the most affordable social work degree programs in Columbus, which are well-known for their accessible tuition and strong community connections.

Texas is another top choice, with the cheapest social work degrees in Denton providing robust online curriculums. Additionally, the cheapest social work degrees in Florida offer flexible pathways and specializations that align well with a psychology background.

Exploring these affordable social work degree options can set you on a fulfilling career journey while minimizing student debt, making it easier to transition from your psychology studies into professional service roles.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Palmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles