World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William Forde Thompson

William Forde Thompson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4017 3703 214 207 230 13380

William Forde Thompson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William Forde Thompson between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William Forde Thompson published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2024. 41 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2024. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 4 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 5 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 15 publications
1964 2025

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William Forde Thompson: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 4
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 2
1970 1
1971 1
1972 5
1973 4
1974 0
1975 3
1976 3
1977 2
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 3
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 5
1993 5
1994 4
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 5
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 8
2005 3
2006 10
2007 8
2008 7
2009 11
2010 8
2011 5
2012 10
2013 8
2014 8
2015 10
2016 7
2017 9
2018 10
2019 16
2020 15
2021 18
2022 10
2023 13
2024 26
2025 15
Total 325
Download as CSV

William Forde Thompson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Forde Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 230
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

William Forde Thompson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Forde Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William Forde Thompson is affiliated with Bond University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a notable focus on cognitive neuroscience and music-related studies.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Music and Audio Processing

William Forde Thompson's recent publications illustrate a concentration on music's cognitive and therapeutic roles. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Why is music therapeutic for neurological disorders? The Therapeutic Music Capacities Model" (2020) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "The psychological basis of music appreciation: Structure, self, source." (2022) published in Psychological Review
  • "Music Training for Children With Sensorineural Hearing Loss Improves Speech-in-Noise Perception" (2020) published in Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • "Rhythmic Chanting and Mystical States across Traditions" (2021) published in Brain Sciences
  • "Music Engagement as a Source of Cognitive Reserve" (2023) published in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®

Frequent coauthors contributing to collaborations with William Forde Thompson include:

  • Kirk N. Olsen
  • Yixue Quan
  • Gemma Perry
  • Merrick Powell
  • Chi Yhun Lo

Key publication venues where the scientist's work frequently appears are:

  • Musicae Scientiae
  • Brain Sciences
  • Current Psychology
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

The focus on neuroscience is reflected in 55 publications, while psychology accounts for 33. Subfields covered extensively include cognitive neuroscience (53 publications), music (19), social psychology (15), experimental and cognitive psychology (11), and psychiatry and mental health (7).

William Forde Thompson was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1949.

Best Publications

  • Arousal, Mood, and The Mozart Effect:

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Gabriela Husain

  • A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Perception of Emotion in Music: Psychophysical and Cultural Cues

    Laura Lee Balkwill;William Forde Thompson

  • Effects of Musical Tempo and Mode on Arousal, Mood, and Spatial Abilities

    Gabriela Husain;William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Decoding speech prosody: do music lessons help?

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Gabriela Husain

  • A Comparison of Acoustic Cues in Music and Speech for Three Dimensions of Affect

    Gabriella Ilie;William Forde Thompson

  • Music, Thought, and Feeling: Understanding the Psychology of Music

    William Forde Thompson

  • Seeing music performance: Visual influences on perception and experience

    William Forde Thompson;Phil Graham;Phil Graham;Frank A. Russo

  • Recognition of emotion in Japanese, Western, and Hindustani music by Japanese listeners

    Laura Lee Balkwill;William Forde Thompson;Rie Matsunaga

  • Who enjoys listening to sad music and why

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;William F. Thompson;Doris McIlwain;Tuomas Eerola

  • Fast and loud background music disrupts reading comprehension

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Adriana Katharine Letnic

  • Positional distribution and turnover of fatty acids in phosphatidic acid, phosphinositides, phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in rat brain in vivo.

    R.R. Baker;W. Thompson

  • Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury.

    Robin E.A Green;Gary R Turner;William F Thompson

  • Decoding speech prosody in five languages

    William Forde Thompson;Laura-Lee Balkwill

  • Reduced sensitivity to emotional prosody in congenital amusia rekindles the musical protolanguage hypothesis

    William Forde Thompson;Manuela M. Marin;Lauren Stewart

  • Selective Acylation of 1-Acylglycerophosphorylinositol by Rat Brain Microsomes COMPARISON WITH 1-ACYLGLYCEROPHOSPHORYLCHOLINE

    R. Roy Baker;William Thompson

  • Assessing Music Performance: Issues and Influences

    Gary E. McPherson;William F. Thompson

  • The emergence of music from the Theory of Mind

    Steven Robert Livingstone;William Forde Thompson

  • Audio-visual integration of emotional cues in song

    William Forde Thompson;Frank A. Russo;Lena Quinto

  • Why is music therapeutic for neurological disorders? The Therapeutic Music Capacities Model

    Olivia Brancatisano;Amee Baird;William Forde Thompson

  • Can Composers Express Emotions through Music

    William Forde Thompson;Brent Robitaille

  • Facing the Music

    William Forde Thompson;Frank A. Russo

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank A. Russo
Frank A. Russo Toronto Metropolitan University
Lola L. Cuddy
Lola L. Cuddy Queen's University
E. Glenn Schellenberg
E. Glenn Schellenberg University of Toronto
Genevieve McArthur
Genevieve McArthur Macquarie University
Blake W. Johnson
Blake W. Johnson Macquarie University
Thomas A. Carlson
Thomas A. Carlson University of Sydney
John Sutton
John Sutton Macquarie University
Lauren Stewart
Lauren Stewart Goldsmiths University of London
Fang Liu
Fang Liu Beihang University
Caroline Palmer
Caroline Palmer McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Psychology opens up a range of career pathways, particularly in counseling and therapy. Marriage and family therapy (MFT) is a growing field that attracts many graduates due to the meaningful work and rising demand. However, becoming a licensed therapist in the U.S. requires meeting specific educational and certification requirements, which can vary significantly by location.

For example, those interested in practicing in Nevada should review the North Las Vegas mft certification requirements. Similarly, if planning a career in California, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the mft requirements in Oakland. Each state sets its own standards for supervised hours, degree type, and licensing exams.

In other regions, such as Oklahoma, the Oklahoma City mft education requirements offer insight into the process, while aspiring professionals in Nebraska need to consider the Omaha mft education requirements. Prospective students should carefully research local licensure criteria to ensure their online degree aligns with regional regulations and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing William Forde Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles