World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
10293
World Ranking
5429
National Ranking
565

Tuomas Eerola publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tuomas Eerola sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tuomas Eerola D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tuomas Eerola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tuomas Eerola is a researcher affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom, specializing in the intersection of neuroscience and music perception. Their academic work spans multiple fields including neuroscience and psychology, with a strong focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, music, and signal processing.

Their research topics encompass diverse aspects of music and audio processing, neuroscience and music perception, music therapy and health, multisensory perception and integration, diverse music education insights, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and music technology and sound studies.

Recent publications by Tuomas Eerola include:

  • Music Emotion Recognition: Toward new, robust standards in personalized and context-sensitive applications (2021, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine)
  • Music May Reduce Loneliness and Act as Social Surrogate for a Friend: Evidence from an Experimental Listening Study (2020, Music & Science)
  • Interpersonal Entrainment in Music Performance (2020, Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal)
  • Harmonic organisation conveys both universal and culture-specific cues for emotional expression in music (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Cultural familiarity and musical expertise impact the pleasantness of consonance/dissonance but not its perceived tension (2020, Scientific Reports)

Frequent collaborators include Imre Lahdelma, Jamés O. Armitage, Kelly Jakubowski, Nieves Fuentes-Sánchez, and Martin Clayton. Collaboration networks highlight a consistent engagement with peers in music psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Main publication venues where Tuomas Eerola's work appears frequently are Music & Science, PLoS ONE, Musicae Scientiae, Frontiers in Psychology, and Psychology of Music. This distribution indicates a concentration within journals that focus on psychological and neuroscientific aspects of music.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of the discrete and dimensional models of emotion in music

    Tuomas Eerola;Jonna K. Vuoskoski

  • Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy

    Marcel Zentner;Tuomas Eerola

  • A Review of Music and Emotion Studies: Approaches, Emotion Models, and Stimuli

    Tuomas Eerola;Jonna K. Vuoskoski

  • Who enjoys listening to sad music and why

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;William F. Thompson;Doris McIlwain;Tuomas Eerola

  • Can sad music really make you sad? Indirect measures of affective states induced by music and autobiographical memories.

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;Tuomas Eerola

  • Cross-cultural music cognition: cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks

    Carol L. Krumhansl;Pekka Toivanen;Tuomas Eerola;Petri Toiviainen

  • What makes music emotionally significant? Exploring the underlying mechanisms:

    Patrik N. Juslin;László Harmat;Tuomas Eerola

  • PREDICTION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL EMOTIONAL RATINGS IN MUSIC FROM AUDIO USING MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION MODELS

    Tuomas Eerola;Olivier Lartillot;Petri Toiviainen

  • Measuring music-induced emotion: A comparison of emotion models, personality biases, and intensity of experiences

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;Tuomas Eerola

  • The role of mood and personality in the perception of emotions represented by music.

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;Tuomas Eerola

  • Universal and culture-specific factors in the recognition and performance of musical affect expressions.

    Petri Laukka;Tuomas Eerola;Nutankumar S. Thingujam;Teruo Yamasaki

  • Being moved by unfamiliar sad music is associated with high empathy.

    Tuomas Eerola;Tuomas Eerola;Jonna Katariina Vuoskoski;Jonna Katariina Vuoskoski;Hannu Kautiainen

  • It's Sad but I Like It: The Neural Dissociation Between Musical Emotions and Liking in Experts and Laypersons.

    Elvira Brattico;Elvira Brattico;Elvira Brattico;Brigitte Bogert;Vinoo Alluri;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: An meg study

    Elvira Brattico;Karen Johanne Pallesen;Olga Varyagina;Christopher Bailey

  • The Role of Melodic and Temporal Cues in Perceiving Musical Meter

    Erin E. Hannon;Joel S. Snyder;Tuomas Eerola;Carol L. Krumhansl

  • The Pleasure Evoked by Sad Music Is Mediated by Feelings of Being Moved.

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;Tuomas Eerola

  • Extended Music Education Enhances the Quality of School Life.

    Päivi-Sisko Eerola;Tuomas Eerola

  • Extramusical information contributes to emotions induced by music

    Jonna K. Vuoskoski;Tuomas Eerola

  • Emotional expression in music: contribution, linearity, and additivity of primary musical cues.

    Tuomas Eerola;Anders Friberg;Roberto Bresin

  • Timbre and Affect Dimensions: Evidence from Affect and Similarity Ratings and Acoustic Correlates of Isolated Instrument Sounds

    Tuomas Eerola;Rafael Ferrer;Vinoo Alluri

  • Melodic Expectation in Finnish Spiritual Folk Hymns: Convergence of Statistical, Behavioral, and Computational Approaches

    Carol L. Krumhansl;Jukka Louhivuori;Petri Toiviainen;Topi Järvinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Petri Toiviainen
Petri Toiviainen University of Jyväskylä
Elvira Brattico
Elvira Brattico Aarhus University
Peter E. Keller
Peter E. Keller University of Sydney
Antonio Camurri
Antonio Camurri University of Genoa
Mark Sandler
Mark Sandler Google (United States)
Carol L. Krumhansl
Carol L. Krumhansl Cornell University
Patrik N. Juslin
Patrik N. Juslin Uppsala University
Marcus T. Pearce
Marcus T. Pearce Queen Mary University of London
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Petri Laukka
Petri Laukka Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology can open many doors, especially with the increasing availability of online degree programs. These programs offer flexible options for students looking to balance coursework with other commitments while preparing for essential career milestones.

For those interested in becoming licensed professionals, it’s important to understand that requirements can vary by location. For example, Madison licensed therapist education requirements highlight the need for a master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, and passing specific exams. Similarly, Memphis licensed therapist education requirements focus on relevant graduate coursework and state licensure standards.

Different states have unique requirements, so it’s wise to research local pathways. If you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Mesa or want to learn more about the Miami licensed therapist requirements, you’ll find that region-specific guidelines, exams, and supervised experience are crucial.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can be the first step on this rewarding career path, but make sure to align your education with the licensing standards in your intended state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Tuomas Eerola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles