World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
12282
World Ranking
3420
National Ranking
177

Peter E. Keller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Keller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 302 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter E. Keller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Keller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Peter E. Keller is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and conducts research primarily in neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans several fields, focusing extensively on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology, with contributions also in experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and signal processing.

Their research covers key topics including neuroscience and music perception, action observation and synchronization, neural dynamics and brain function, multisensory perception and integration, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, vestibular and auditory disorders, and music and audio processing.

Recent publications highlight various aspects of rhythm, brain function, and music performance. Notable papers include:

  • "Interpersonal Entrainment in Music Performance" (2020), published in Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
  • "Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates" (2021), in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Endogenous sources of interbrain synchrony in duetting pianists" (2021), in Cerebral Cortex
  • "The Neuroscience of Dance: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Review" (2023), in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "A review of psychological and neuroscientific research on musical groove" (2023), in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Peter E. Keller frequently collaborates with several researchers, with notable coauthors including Manuel Varlet, Sylvie Nozaradan, Sendhil Govender, James G. Colebatch, and Neil P. McAngus Todd, reflecting a broad network within the field.

Major venues for their work feature Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cerebral Cortex, Neuroscience Letters, and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, indicating a strong presence in journals focused on neuroscience and cognitive research.

They were recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1990, highlighting a longstanding engagement with psychological science.

Best Publications

  • Individual Differences in Rhythmic Cortical Entrainment Correlate with Predictive Behavior in Sensorimotor Synchronization

    Sylvie Nozaradan;Sylvie Nozaradan;Isabelle Peretz;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization

    Maria Christine Van Der Steen;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • Rhythm in joint action: psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination.

    Peter E. Keller;Giacomo Novembre;Michael J. Hove

  • Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect.

    Masami Ishihara;Peter E. Keller;Yves Rossetti;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization.

    Peter E. Keller;Günther Knoblich;Günther Knoblich;Bruno H. Repp;Bruno H. Repp

  • Mental imagery in music performance: underlying mechanisms and potential benefits

    Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization

    Nadine Pecenka;Peter E. Keller

  • Individual Differences, Auditory Imagery, and the Coordination of Body Movements and Sounds in Musical Ensembles

    Peter E. Keller;Mirjam Appel

  • Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musical interactions.

    Jessica Phillips-Silver;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: effects of intention, attention, and awareness.

    Bruno H. Repp;Peter E. Keller

  • Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: a TMS investigation.

    Jan Stupacher;Jan Stupacher;Michael J. Hove;Giacomo Novembre;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • Synchronizing with auditory and visual rhythms: an fMRI assessment of modality differences and modality appropriateness.

    Michael J. Hove;Merle T. Fairhurst;Sonja A. Kotz;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • What can music tell us about social interaction

    Alessandro D’Ausilio;Giacomo Novembre;Luciano Fadiga;Luciano Fadiga;Peter E. Keller

  • The impact of basal ganglia lesions on sensorimotor synchronization, spontaneous motor tempo, and the detection of tempo changes

    Michael Schwartze;Peter E. Keller;Aniruddh D. Patel;Sonja A. Kotz

  • Joint action in music performance

    Peter E. Keller

  • Gait improvement via rhythmic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease is linked to rhythmic skills

    Simone Dalla Bella;Charles-Etienne Benoit;Charles-Etienne Benoit;Nicolas Farrugia;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection

    Florian Waszak;Edmund Wascher;Peter E. Keller;Iring Koch

  • Being and Feeling in Sync with an Adaptive Virtual Partner: Brain Mechanisms Underlying Dynamic Cooperativity

    Merle T. Fairhurst;Petr Janata;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • Action planning in sequential skills: relations to music performance.

    Peter E. Keller;Iring Koch

  • Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression

    Peter E. Keller

  • Embodied music cognition and mediation technology

    Peter E. Keller;Petr Janata

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruno H. Repp
Bruno H. Repp Haskins Laboratories
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Simone Schütz-Bosbach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University
Christian Keysers
Christian Keysers University of Amsterdam
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Barbara Tillmann
Barbara Tillmann Laboratory for Research on Learning and Development
Günther Knoblich
Günther Knoblich Central European University
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology from a U.S. institution offers a wide range of career pathways, including clinical practice, research, counseling, and education. With the rise of online programs, students now have more accessible routes to complete the academic requirements needed for licensure as a therapist or counselor in different states.

Before practicing, aspiring therapists must fulfill strict educational and licensure requirements that vary by location. For instance, New York City licensed therapist education requirements outline the necessary graduate degrees and supervised experience. If you are interested in practicing in New Jersey, view the details on how to become a licensed therapist in Newark for local standards.

Other locations present similar—but slightly different—paths. Prospective counselors should review how to become a licensed therapist in Norfolk or the North Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements for region-specific advice. These guides can help you choose the best online degree program and plan your career after graduation, whether you hope to serve your community or specialize in a clinical setting.

Best Scientists Citing Peter E. Keller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles