World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10979 10276 5725 5227 112 3707

Peter Q. Pfordresher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Q. Pfordresher between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Q. Pfordresher published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2025. 38 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2025. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 29 publications
1997 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Q. Pfordresher: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 5
2013 6
2014 9
2015 11
2016 3
2017 21
2018 2
2019 7
2020 4
2021 12
2022 5
2023 3
2024 9
2025 29
Total 154
Download as CSV

Peter Q. Pfordresher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Q. Pfordresher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Q. Pfordresher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Q. Pfordresher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Q. Pfordresher is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research focuses broadly on the intersection of neuroscience, music perception, and audio processing, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Globally, songs and instrumental melodies are slower and higher and use more stable pitches than speech: A Registered Report (2024, Science Advances)
  • The Prevalence and Correlates of Accurate Singing (2020, Journal of Research in Music Education)
  • Spontaneous Production Rates in Music and Speech (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Individuals with autism spectrum disorder are impaired in absolute but not relative pitch and duration matching in speech and song imitation (2021, Autism Research)
  • The Role of Long-Term Memory in Mental Transformations of Pitch (2020, Auditory Perception & Cognition)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Peter Q. Pfordresher include:

  • Siu-Lan Tan
  • Rom Harré
  • Emma B. Greenspon
  • Tim A. Pruitt
  • Andrea R. Halpern

Key venues where Peter Q. Pfordresher has published include:

  • Auditory Perception & Cognition
  • Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Psychological Research
  • Science Advances

Their main fields of study are Neuroscience and Computer Science, with subfields covering:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Music
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Research topics addressed in their work span:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Best Publications

  • The somatotopy of speech: Phonation and articulation in the human motor cortex

    Steven Brown;Angela R. Laird;Peter Q. Pfordresher;Sarah M. Thelen

  • POOR-PITCH SINGING IN THE ABSENCE OF "TONE DEAFNESS"

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Steven Brown

  • Enhanced production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Steven Brown

  • Incremental planning in sequence production.

    Caroline Palmer;Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Psychology of Music: From Sound to Significance

    Siu-Lan Tan;Peter Pfordresher;Rom Harré

  • Imprecise singing is widespread

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Steven Brown;Kimberly M. Meier;Michel Belyk

  • Singing Ability, Musical Self-Concept, and Future Music Participation.

    Steven M. Demorest;Jamey Kelley;Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Native Experience with a Tone Language Enhances Pitch Discrimination and the Timing of Neural Responses to Pitch Change

    Ryan J. Giuliano;Peter Q. Pfordresher;Emily M. Stanley;Shalini Narayana

  • Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance.

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Caroline Palmer

  • Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance.

    P. Q. Pfordresher;C. Palmer

  • Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing

    Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Coordination of perception and action in music performance

    Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Auditory feedback in music performance: the role of melodic structure and musical skill.

    Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Tracking Musical Patterns using Joint Accent Structure

    Mari Riess Jones;Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • The Role of Melodic and Rhythmic Accents in Musical Structure

    Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • Temporal coordination in joint music performance: effects of endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback

    Anna Zamm;Peter Q. Pfordresher;Caroline Palmer

  • Speed, accuracy, and serial order in sequence production.

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Caroline Palmer;Melissa K. Jungers

  • Auditory imagery and the poor-pitch singer.

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;Andrea R. Halpern

  • Vocal Imitation of Song and Speech.

    James T. Mantell;Peter Q. Pfordresher

  • The neural basis of vocal pitch imitation in humans

    Michel Belyk;Peter Q. Pfordresher;Mario Liotti;Steven Brown

  • Singing with yourself: evidence for an inverse modeling account of poor-pitch singing.

    Peter Q. Pfordresher;James T. Mantell

Frequent Co-Authors

Rom Harré
Rom Harré Georgetown University
Caroline Palmer
Caroline Palmer McGill University
Andrea R. Halpern
Andrea R. Halpern Bucknell University
Steven Brown
Steven Brown McMaster University
Mario Liotti
Mario Liotti University of Padua
Emmanouil Benetos
Emmanouil Benetos Queen Mary University of London
Graham Welch
Graham Welch University College London
Fang Liu
Fang Liu Beihang University
Lauren Stewart
Lauren Stewart Goldsmiths University of London
Mari Riess Jones
Mari Riess Jones The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees online opens doors to diverse career opportunities, with marriage and family therapy (MFT) being a popular pathway. Becoming an MFT requires rigorous education and licensing, but requirements vary by location. For example, understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Diego will help you navigate specific regional criteria for coursework and internships.

Aspiring therapists can also benefit from learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco, as licensing and certification processes may include city-specific stipulations. Furthermore, understanding San Jose mft certification requirements can help clarify the steps needed after obtaining a psychology degree, such as supervised experience and state exams.

For those comparing programs, researching Santa Ana mft education requirements can be key to determining which online or hybrid degree best fits your goals. Overall, studying psychology in the USA offers a variety of online pathways, each with its own licensure considerations, making in-depth research essential for informed career decisions.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Q. Pfordresher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles