World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
9758
World Ranking
2993
National Ranking
116

Olivier Favez publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Favez sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 211 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Olivier Favez D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Favez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Favez is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular emphasis on atmospheric science and related subfields.

The scientist's work covers various interdisciplinary areas, including health, toxicology, mutagenesis, environmental engineering, automotive engineering, and global and planetary change. Key topics within their research portfolio include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, air quality monitoring and forecasting, vehicle emissions and performance, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and maritime transport emissions and efficiency.

Favez has contributed extensively to the scientific literature. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe" (2020, Nature)
  • "European aerosol phenomenology − 8: Harmonised source apportionment of organic aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS datasets" (2022, Environment International)
  • "A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories" (2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)
  • "Meteorology-driven variability of air pollution (PM 1) revealed with explainable machine learning" (2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • "Substantial brown carbon emissions from wintertime residential wood burning over France" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)

The scientist regularly publishes in several key venues relevant to their fields, including:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Environment International
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmosphere

Olivier Favez has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, among them:

  • Jean-Eudes Petit
  • Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
  • Andrés Alástuey
  • Gaëlle Uzu
  • Nicolas Marchand

Best Publications

  • Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe.

    Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Gaëlle Uzu;Jianhui Jiang;Laure Estelle Cassagnes

  • A user-friendly tool for comprehensive evaluation of the geographical origins of atmospheric pollution

    J.-E. Petit;O. Favez;A. Albinet;F. Canonaco

  • Inter-comparison of source apportionment models for the estimation of wood burning aerosols during wintertime in an Alpine city (Grenoble, France)

    O. Favez;O. Favez;I. El Haddad;C. Piot;C. Piot;A. Boreave

  • Characterization of aerosol chemical composition with aerosol mass spectrometry in Central Europe: An overview

    V. A. Lanz;A. S. H. Prevot;M. R. Alfarra;M. R. Alfarra;S. Weimer

  • European aerosol phenomenology - 8: Harmonised source apportionment of organic aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS datasets.

    Unknown

  • Source apportionment of PM 10 in a north-western Europe regional urban background site (Lens, France) using positive matrix factorization and including primary biogenic emissions

    A. Waked;O. Favez;L. Y. Alleman;C. Piot

  • Seasonal variability and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the Paris megacity (France)

    Alexia Baudic;Valérie Gros;Stéphane Sauvage;Nadine Locoge

  • Evidence for a significant contribution of wood burning aerosols to PM2.5 during the winter season in Paris, France

    Olivier Favez;Hélène Cachier;Jean Sciare;Roland Sarda-Estève

  • Two years of near real-time chemical composition of submicron aerosols in the region of Paris using an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) and a multi-wavelength Aethalometer

    J.-E. Petit;J.-E. Petit;O. Favez;J. Sciare;V. Crenn

  • Long-term measurements of carbonaceous aerosols in the Eastern Mediterranean: evidence of long-range transport of biomass burning

    J. Sciare;K. Oikonomou;O. Favez;E. Liakakou

  • ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison - Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments

    Vincent Crenn;Jean Sciare;Jean Sciare;Philip L. Croteau;Stéphanie Verlhac

  • Long-term observations of carbonaceous aerosols in the Austral Ocean atmosphere: Evidence of a biogenic marine organic source

    J. Sciare;O. Favez;R. Sarda-Estève;K. Oikonomou

  • Large contribution of water‐insoluble secondary organic aerosols in the region of Paris (France) during wintertime

    Jean Sciare;Odile d'Argouges;Roland Sarda-Estève;Cécile Gaimoz

  • ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison - Part 2: Intercomparison of ME-2 organic source apportionment results from 15 individual, co-located aerosol mass spectrometers

    R. Fröhlich;V. Crenn;A. Setyan;C. A. Belis

  • Size-partitioning of an urban aerosol to identify particle determinants involved in the proinflammatory response induced in airway epithelial cells

    Kiran Ramgolam;Olivier Favez;Hélène Cachier;Annie Gaudichet

  • Traffic induced particle resuspension in Paris: Emission factors and source contributions

    F. Amato;O. Favez;M. Pandolfi;A. Alastuey

  • European guide on air pollution source apportionment with receptor models.

    CA Belis;O Favez;M Mirea;E Diapouli

  • Evidence of major secondary organic aerosol contribution to lensing effect black carbon absorption enhancement

    Yunjiang Zhang;Olivier Favez;Francesco Canonaco;Dantong Liu

  • Alternative pathway for atmospheric particles growth

    Maria Eugenia Monge;Thomas Rosenørn;Olivier Favez;Markus Müller

  • Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review

    Angeliki Karanasiou;María Cruz Minguillón;Mar Viana;Andrés Alastuey

  • Evaluation of receptor and chemical transport models for PM10 source apportionment

    C.A. Belis;D. Pernigotti;G. Pirovano;O. Favez

  • A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories

    Paolo Laj;Paolo Laj;Alessandro Bigi;Clémence Rose;Elisabeth Andrews;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Seasonality of major aerosol species and their transformations in Cairo megacity

    Olivier Favez;Hélène Cachier;Jean Sciare;Stéphane C. Alfaro

Frequent Co-Authors

Valérie Gros
Valérie Gros Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean Sciare
Jean Sciare Cyprus Institute
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo Grenoble Alpes University
Griša Močnik
Griša Močnik Jožef Stefan Institute
André S. H. Prévôt
André S. H. Prévôt Paul Scherrer Institute
Andrés Alastuey
Andrés Alastuey Spanish National Research Council
Francesco Canonaco
Francesco Canonaco Paul Scherrer Institute
Paolo Laj
Paolo Laj Grenoble Alpes University
Marco Pandolfi
Marco Pandolfi Spanish National Research Council
Hélène Cachier
Hélène Cachier Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their careers in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and affordable options. Many professionals pursue education that complements their field, such as those found in online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements, which provide a streamlined route to earning a doctorate without the extensive research focus typical of traditional programs.

Additionally, educators and environmental advocates might consider pathways like online EDS to EDD programs. These programs support the transition from a Master’s in Education to a Doctorate in Education, equipping graduates to lead policy, curriculum design, or community programs addressing environmental issues.

Social work also intersects with Environmental Sciences, particularly in community resilience and sustainability. The cheapest DSW program online could be an ideal choice for those aiming to integrate social work principles with environmental initiatives, helping vulnerable populations adapt to ecological changes.

For students seeking broad foundational knowledge with budget-friendly options, exploring low cost online general studies degree programs can be a practical start. These flexible programs allow learners to tailor their studies, combining environmental science with other disciplines to build diverse skills and open multiple career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Favez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles