World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6741 6266 3272 2984 122 5302

Nate McCaughtry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nate McCaughtry between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nate McCaughtry published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2008. 1 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2008. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nate McCaughtry: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 0
2003 3
2004 4
2005 5
2006 7
2007 10
2008 13
2009 6
2010 4
2011 11
2012 7
2013 5
2014 8
2015 5
2016 9
2017 6
2018 3
2019 4
2020 2
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 123
Download as CSV

Nate McCaughtry publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nate McCaughtry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 122
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Nate McCaughtry D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nate McCaughtry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Nate McCaughtry is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research contributions span several intersecting fields, primarily focusing on health professions, medicine, and psychology. The work often addresses topics related to public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, speech and hearing, education, and physiology.

The main research topics covered by McCaughtry include obesity, physical activity, and diet, school health and nursing education, early childhood education and development, physical activity and health, children's physical and motor development, eating disorders and behaviors, as well as behavioral health and interventions.

McCaughtry has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Erin E. Centeio, Cheryl L. Somers, Noel Kulik, Alex C. Garn, and E. Whitney G. Moore.

The scientist has published research in a number of journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of School Health
  • International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education
  • Frontiers in Health Services

Significant recent papers by McCaughtry include:

  • "Effects of a Comprehensive School Health Program on Elementary Student Academic Achievement" (2021), published in the Journal of School Health
  • "Differences of In-School Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity among Fourth Grade Urban Youth" (2020), published in the International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education
  • "Emotion-Driven Eating and Overeating Among Fourth Graders: The Roles of Body Image, Academic Achievement, and Peer and School Factors" (2023), published in the Journal of School Health
  • "The Community Health Worker academy: a novel healthcare and public health workforce development model" (2025), published in Frontiers in Health Services

Best Publications

  • The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation

    Bo Shen;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey J. Martin;Alex C. Garn

  • A pilot study to examine the effects of a nutrition intervention on nutrition knowledge, behaviors, and efficacy expectations in middle school children.

    Mariane M. Fahlman;Joseph A. Dake;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey Martin

  • Girly Girls Can Play Games / Las Niñas Pueden Jugar Tambien: Co-Creating a Curriculum of Possibilities With Fifth-Grade Girls

    Kimberly L. Oliver;Manal Hamzeh;Nate McCaughtry

  • Effects of Teacher Autonomy Support and Students Autonomous Motivation on Learning in Physical Education

    Bo Shen;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey J. Martin;Mariane Fahlman

  • Urban Teachersí Use of Productive and Reproductive Teaching Styles Within the Confines of the National Curriculum for Physical Education

    Matthew D. Curtner-Smith;John R. Todorovich;Nate A. McCaughtry;Simon A. Lacon

  • Urban High-School Girls’ Sense of Relatedness and Their Engagement in Physical Education

    Bo Shen;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey J. Martin;Mariane Fahlman

  • Learning to Teach Sport Education: Misunderstandings, Pedagogical Difficulties, and Resistance

    Nate McCaughtry;Seidu Sofo;Inez Rovegno;Matthew Curtner-Smith

  • The Emotional Dimensions of a Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Influences on Content, Curriculum, and Pedagogy

    Nate McCaughtry

  • The Influence of Self-Determination in Physical Education on Leisure-Time Physical Activity Behavior

    Bo Shen;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey J. Martin

  • The Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Physical Activity in Mexican American Children

    Jeffrey J. Martin;Kimberly L. Oliver;Nate McCaughtry

  • The influences of professional development on teachers' self-efficacy toward educational change

    Jeffrey J. Martin;Nate Mccaughtry;Pamela Hodges-Kulinna;Donetta Cothran

  • Teachers' Perspectives on the Challenges of Teaching Physical Education in Urban Schools: The Student Emotional Filter.

    Nate McCaughtry;Sara Barnard;Jeffrey Martin;Bo Shen

  • Culturally relevant physical education in urban schools: reflecting cultural knowledge.

    Sara B. Flory;Nate McCaughtry

  • Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Moving from Blaming Students to Predicting Skillfulness, Recognizing Motor Development, and Understanding Emotion

    Nate McCaughtry;Inez Rovegno

  • PE is not for me: when boys' masculinities are threatened.

    Amy Tischler;Nate McCaughtry

  • Parental social support, perceived competence and enjoyment in school physical activity.

    Bo Shen;Erin Centeio;Alex Garn;Jeffrey Martin

  • Racial and socioeconomic disparities in nutrition behaviors: targeted interventions needed.

    Mariane M. Fahlman;Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey Martin;Bo Shen

  • Teachers Mentoring Teachers: A View Over Time

    Nate McCaughtry;Donetta Cothran;Pamela Hodges Kulinna;Jeffrey J. Martin

  • Surveillance as a technique of power in physical education

    Louisa Webb;Nate McCaughtry;Doune MacDonald

  • The Emotional Dimensions of Urban Teacher Change

    Nate McCaughtry;Jeffrey J. Martin;Pamela Hodges Kulinna;Donetta J. Cothran

  • The theory of planned behavior: Predicting physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in African American children

    Jeffrey J. Martin;Pamela Hodges Kulinna;Nate McCaughtry;Donetta Cothran

  • Elaborating pedagogical content knowledge: what it means to know students and think about teaching

    Nate McCaughtry

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey J. Martin
Jeffrey J. Martin Wayne State University
Alex C. Garn
Alex C. Garn University of Minnesota
Pamela Hodges Kulinna
Pamela Hodges Kulinna Arizona State University
Alexandre J. S. Morin
Alexandre J. S. Morin Concordia University
Doune Macdonald
Doune Macdonald University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens doors to a wide variety of online degree options in the USA. Many students look for flexibility, accelerated paths, and affordability when considering advanced education. For those interested in psychology, understanding how much is a masters in psychology can help you make informed decisions about your investment and future earning potential.

Fast-tracked programs such as accelerated edd degrees are becoming increasingly popular with working professionals wanting to advance in leadership and education roles quickly. Additionally, many universities offer a variety of masters degree online options, allowing for specialization in fields like sociology, anthropology, or communication without pausing your career.

For those seeking to enter the workforce sooner, accelerated online degrees can provide an efficient route to earning a bachelor’s degree in less time than traditional programs. Each path offers unique benefits, so be sure to assess your career goals, schedule, and financial needs before choosing a program.

Best Scientists Citing Nate McCaughtry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles