World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
11490
World Ranking
8071
National Ranking
4324

Mari Riess Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Riess Jones sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mari Riess Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Riess Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mari Riess Jones is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their recent research contributions include work on the effects of randomization in event sequences related to two-choice probability learning.

The scientist has published at least one paper:

  • Effects of randomization of event sequences in two choice probability learning (2023), Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Their publication history predominantly features work published in the venue Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).

Frequent co-authorship data is not available, indicating that Mari Riess Jones has not been documented to collaborate repeatedly with other researchers based on the existing data.

Best Publications

  • The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.

    Edward W. Large;Mari Riess Jones

  • Dynamic attending and responses to time.

    Mari R. Jones;Marilyn Gail Boltz

  • Time, Our Lost Dimension: Toward a New Theory of Perception, Attention, and Memory

    Mari Riess Jones

  • Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays

    Mari Riess Jones;Heather Moynihan;Noah MacKenzie;Jennifer Puente

  • The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending.

    Carolyn Drake;Mari Riess Jones;Clarisse Baruch

  • The time of our lives: Life span development of timing and event tracking

    J. Devin McAuley;Mari Riess Jones;Shayla Holub;Heather M. Johnston

  • Expectancy, attention, and time.

    Ralph Barnes;Mari Riess Jones

  • Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing.

    J. Devin McAuley;Mari Riess Jones

  • Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research.

    Mari Riess Jones;Mari Riess Jones

  • Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context

    Mari R. Jones;Marilyn Gail Boltz;Gary Kidd

  • Evidence for rhythmic attention.

    Mari R. Jones;Gary Kidd;Robin Wetzel

  • Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?

    Marilyn Boltz;Mari Riess Jones

  • Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending

    Mari Riess Jones;Heather Moynihan Johnston;Jennifer Puente

  • Cognitive bases of musical communication

    Mari Riess Jones;Susan Holleran

  • On marching to two different drummers: perceptual aspects of the difficulties.

    Stuart T. Klapp;Martin D. Hill;John G. Tyler;Zeke E. Martin

  • Time judgments in global temporal contexts.

    Mari Riess Jones;J. Devin Mcauley

  • Tests of parallel versus integrated structure in polyrhythmic tapping.

    Richard J. Jagacinski;Elizabeth Marshburn;Stuart T. Klapp;Mari R. Jones

  • Learning and the development of expectancies: An interactionist approach.

    Mari Riess Jones

  • Sensitivity to time change : The role of context and skill

    Mari Riess Jones;William Yee

  • Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part I. Some determinants of expectancies.

    Mari Riess Jones

  • From probability learning to sequential processing: A critical review.

    Mari R. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Devin McAuley
J. Devin McAuley Michigan State University
Barbara Tillmann
Barbara Tillmann Laboratory for Research on Learning and Development
Peter Q. Pfordresher
Peter Q. Pfordresher University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in psychology offers access to a variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways. One rewarding path is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT), a high-demand profession supporting individuals, couples, and families.

Entry into this field typically involves earning an accredited graduate degree in marriage and family therapy or a related area. All states require some form of clinical experience under supervision and successful completion of a licensing exam. However, requirements can differ by city and state.

For example, Milwaukee mft certification requirements emphasize state-approved postgraduate training and a specific number of supervised practice hours. If you are interested in Minnesota, explore the steps on how to become an mft in Minneapolis, which include coursework and state-specific exams.

The process may look a bit different elsewhere; read about how to become an mft in Nashville or learn about the mft requirements in New Orleans for more localized guidance. Researching region-specific criteria ensures you stay on track for a successful career in psychology and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Mari Riess Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles