World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5122
World Ranking
9245
National Ranking
4893

J. Devin McAuley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Devin McAuley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Devin McAuley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Devin McAuley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Devin McAuley is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with notable focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. McAuley's work intersects several specialized areas including Signal Processing, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research topics encompass a range of domains such as:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Reading and Literacy Development

McAuley has contributed to multiple publication venues frequently associated with auditory and cognitive sciences. These include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Cognition
  • Scientific Reports

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • What Drives Narrative Engagement With Music? (2021), published in Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
  • Do you hear what I hear? Perceived narrative constitutes a semantic dimension for music (2021), published in Cognition

The scientist has also frequently collaborated with other researchers, including:

  • Yi Shen
  • Gary R. Kidd
  • Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
  • Dylan V. Pearson
  • Patrick C. M. Wong

Best Publications

  • The time of our lives: Life span development of timing and event tracking

    J. Devin McAuley;Mari Riess Jones;Shayla Holub;Heather M. Johnston

  • Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing.

    J. Devin McAuley;Mari Riess Jones

  • Neural bases of individual differences in beat perception.

    Jessica A. Grahn;J. Devin McAuley

  • Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing

    Laura C. Dilley;J. Devin McAuley

  • Musical rhythm discrimination explains individual differences in grammar skills in children.

    Reyna L. Gordon;Carolyn M. Shivers;Elizabeth A. Wieland;Sonja A. Kotz;Sonja A. Kotz

  • Tempo and Rhythm

    J. Devin McAuley

  • Perception of time as phase: toward an adaptive-oscillator model of rhythmic pattern processing

    J. Devin McAuley

  • FMRI investigation of cross-modal interactions in beat perception: audition primes vision, but not vice versa.

    Jessica A. Grahn;Molly J. Henry;J. Devin McAuley

  • Effect of deviations from temporal expectations on tempo discrimination of isochronous tone sequences.

    J. Devin McAuley;Gary R. Kidd

  • Time judgments in global temporal contexts.

    Mari Riess Jones;J. Devin Mcauley

  • When What You Hear Influences When You See Listening to an Auditory Rhythm Influences the Temporal Allocation of Visual Attention

    Jared E. Miller;Laura A. Carlson;J. Devin McAuley

  • Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences.

    Simon Grondin;J Devin McAuley

  • Evidence for a rhythm perception deficit in children who stutter.

    Elizabeth A. Wieland;J. Devin McAuley;Laura C. Dilley;Soo Eun Chang

  • Wistar-Kyoto rats as an animal model of anxiety vulnerability: support for a hypervigilance hypothesis.

    J.D. McAuley;A.L. Stewart;E.S. Webber;H.C. Cromwell

  • Long-Term Temporal Tracking of Speech Rate Affects Spoken-Word Recognition

    Melissa M. Baese-Berk;Christopher C. Heffner;Laura C. Dilley;Mark A. Pitt

  • Narratives imagined in response to instrumental music reveal culture-bounded intersubjectivity

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of an Imputed Pitch Velocity Model of the Auditory Kappa Effect.

    Molly J. Henry;J. Devin McAuley

  • Tempo sensitivity in isochronous tone sequences: The multiple-look model revisited

    Nathaniel S. Miller;J. Devin McAuley

  • Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis.

    Tuuli H. Morrill;Laura C. Dilley;J. Devin McAuley;Mark A. Pitt

  • Picking up the pace: effects of global temporal context on sensitivity to the tempo of auditory sequences.

    J. Devin McAuley;Nathaniel S. Miller

  • Perspectives on the rhythm–grammar link and its implications for typical and atypical language development

    Reyna L. Gordon;Magdalene S. Jacobs;C. Melanie Schuele;J. Devin McAuley

  • Modality effects in rhythm processing: Auditory encoding of visual rhythms is neither obligatory nor automatic

    J. Devin McAuley;J. Devin McAuley;Molly J. Henry;Molly J. Henry

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Servatius
Richard J. Servatius SUNY Upstate Medical University
Fredrik Ullén
Fredrik Ullén Karolinska Institute
David A. Hinds
David A. Hinds 23andMe (United States)
Mari Riess Jones
Mari Riess Jones The Ohio State University
Mark A. Pitt
Mark A. Pitt The Ohio State University
Patrick C. M. Wong
Patrick C. M. Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Daphne Bavelier
Daphne Bavelier University of Geneva
Nancy J. Cox
Nancy J. Cox Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Joel S. Snyder
Joel S. Snyder University of Nevada, Las Vegas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology can open doors to diverse and fulfilling career pathways. One popular area is substance abuse counseling, which is growing in demand across the United States. Each state and city has its unique requirements, so it's essential to understand the local expectations for certification and education.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a counselor in Texas, you can review the Garland substance abuse counselors education requirements to learn about the degree and training needed. Similarly, those looking to work in Arizona should read about the substance abuse counselor requirements in Gilbert and how to become a substance abuse counselor in Glendale.

Aspiring counselors in North Carolina can access information on Greensboro substance abuse counselor certification requirements. By understanding these local requirements and considering accredited online degree options, you'll be better prepared for a meaningful and successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing J. Devin McAuley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles