World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kalervo Järvelin

Kalervo Järvelin

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
19734
World Ranking
6296
National Ranking
43

Kalervo Järvelin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kalervo Järvelin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 256 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kalervo Järvelin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kalervo Järvelin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kalervo Järvelin is affiliated with Tampere University in Finland and has contributed extensively to the fields of Computer Science and Decision Sciences. Their research covers a range of topics primarily centered around scientometrics and bibliometrics, with additional focus on research data management practices, information retrieval and search behavior, expert finding and question-answering systems, computational and text analysis methods, advanced text analysis techniques, and natural language processing techniques.

Their recent published papers include:

  • LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles (2021), Journal of Documentation
  • Characteristics of LIS research articles affecting their citation impact (2023), Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Some of the frequent co-authors contributing to their work are:

  • Pertti Vakkari
  • Yu-Wei Chang
  • Elizaveta Zimina
  • Jaakko Peltonen
  • Aarne Ranta

Järvelin's research has been published in various venues such as:

  • Journal of Documentation
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Scientometrics
  • Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their primary fields of study encompass:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

Within these fields, subfields of focus include:

  • Information Systems
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • General Social Sciences
  • Communication

Best Publications

  • Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques

    Kalervo Järvelin;Jaana Kekäläinen

  • IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents

    Kalervo Järvelin;Jaana Kekäläinen

  • IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents

    Unknown

  • Task complexity affects information seeking and use

    Katriina Byström;Kalervo Järvelin

  • The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (The Information Retrieval Series)

    Peter Ingwersen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain

    Preben Hansen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: a content analysis of journal articles

    Kalervo Järvelin;Pertti Vakkari

  • Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation

    Jaana Kekäläinen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science.

    Kalervo Jarvelin;Pertti Vakkari

  • On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research.

    Kalervo Järvelin;T. D. Wilson

  • Information Seeking Research Needs Extension towards Tasks and Technology.

    Kalervo Järvelin;Peter Ingwersen

  • Stemming and lemmatization in the clustering of finnish text documents

    Tuomo Korenius;Jorma Laurikkala;Kalervo Järvelin;Martti Juhola

  • Dictionary-Based Cross-Language Information Retrieval: Problems, Methods, and Research Findings

    Ari Pirkola;Turid Hedlund;Heikki Keskustalo;Kalervo Järvelin

  • Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005: Content analysis of journal articles

    Otto Tuomaala;Kalervo Järvelin;Pertti Vakkari

  • Discounted cumulated gain based evaluation of multiple-query IR sessions

    Kalervo Järvelin;Susan L. Price;Lois M. L. Delcambre;Marianne Lykke Nielsen

  • Information retrieval in context: IRiX

    Peter Ingwersen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • The impact of query structure and query expansion on retrieval performance

    Jaana Kekäläinen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • Dictionary-Based Cross-Language Information Retrieval: Learning Experiences from CLEF 2000–2002

    Turid Hedlund;Eija Airio;Heikki Keskustalo;Raija Lehtokangas

  • ExpansionTool: Concept-Based Query Expansion and Construction

    Kalervo Järvelin;Jaana Kekäläinen;Timo Niemi

  • Report on the SIGIR 2010 workshop on the simulation of interaction

    Leif Azzopardi;Kalervo Järvelin;Jaap Kamps;Mark D. Smucker

  • Creating and exploiting a comparable corpus in cross-language information retrieval

    Tuomas Talvensaari;Jorma Laurikkala;Kalervo Järvelin;Martti Juhola

  • Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Kalervo Järvelin;Micheline Beaulieu;Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Sung Hyon Myaeng

  • Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Efthimis N. Efthimiadis;Susan Dumais;David Hawking;Kalervo Järvelin

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Ingwersen
Peter Ingwersen University of Copenhagen
Pertti Vakkari
Pertti Vakkari Tampere University
Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Leif Azzopardi
Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde
Alan F. Smeaton
Alan F. Smeaton Dublin City University
Peter Bruza
Peter Bruza Queensland University of Technology
James Allan
James Allan University of Massachusetts Amherst
Norbert Fuhr
Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen
Aiden R. Doherty
Aiden R. Doherty University of Oxford
Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the USA opens up a wide range of options for aspiring computer science students. Many learners seek cheapest mba programs to combine technology skills with business knowledge, leading to management and leadership roles in tech industries.

For those looking to fast-track their education, finding a 1 year masters program can help accelerate your academic journey and quickly boost your credentials. If you want to save even more time, there are fast degrees online that offer high earning potential and quick entry into the workforce—perfect for students eager to begin their careers.

With the rise of artificial intelligence, tech professionals are increasingly interested in gaining specialized knowledge. Enrolling in an artificial intelligence degree online can give you a competitive edge and prepare you for some of the most in-demand roles in the tech sector.

Whether you're seeking flexibility, affordability, or specialized expertise, online degrees offer diverse career pathways for computer science students.

Best Scientists Citing Kalervo Järvelin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles