World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
14534
World Ranking
7767
National Ranking
32

Peter Ingwersen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ingwersen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Ingwersen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ingwersen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Ingwersen is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Decision Sciences and Information Systems and Management. The focus of their work includes topics related to Academic Publishing and Open Access.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the paper titled "Do journals and corporate sponsors back certain views in topics where disagreement prevails?" published in 2020 in the journal Scientometrics. This paper has been cited in other research once, indicating some engagement with the research community.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter Ingwersen have included:

  • Søren Holm
  • Birger Larsen
  • Thomas Ploug

Peter Ingwersen's work has appeared in the publication venue:

  • Scientometrics

The main fields of study represented in their publications are:

  • Decision Sciences

Subfields include:

  • Information Systems and Management

The primary topics covered within their research are:

  • Academic Publishing and Open Access

Best Publications

  • The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context

    Peter Ingwersen;Kalervo Jrvelin

  • Information Retrieval Interaction

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’

    Tomas C. Almind;Peter Ingwersen

  • Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction : elements of a cognitive IR theory

    Peter Emil Rerup Ingwersen

  • Developing a test collection for the evaluation of integrated search

    Marianne Lykke;Birger Larsen;Haakon Lund;Peter Ingwersen

  • The calculation of web impact factors

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Toward a basic framework for webometrics

    Lennart Björneborn;Peter Ingwersen

  • Perspective of webometrics

    Lennart Björneborn;Peter Ingwersen

  • The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems

    Pia Borlund;Peter Ingwersen

  • Dimensions of relevance

    Erica Cosijn;Peter Ingwersen

  • SEARCH PROCEDURES IN THE LIBRARY—ANALYSED FROM THE COGNITIVE POINT OF VIEW

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Information Seeking Research Needs Extension towards Tasks and Technology.

    Kalervo Järvelin;Peter Ingwersen

  • Information and information science in context

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Cognitive Information Retrieval.

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Polyrepresentation of information needs and semantic entities: elements of a cognitive theory for information retrieval interaction

    Peter Ingwersen

  • Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR

    Pia Borlund;Peter Ingwersen

  • Information retrieval in context: IRiX

    Peter Ingwersen;Kalervo Järvelin

  • Proceedings of ISSI 2005 – The 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics: Stockholm, Sweden, July 24-28, 2005

    Peter Ingwersen;Birger Larsen

  • The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context Springer.

    P Ingwersen;K Jarvelin

  • Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: fundamental methodological issues

    Peter Ingwersen;Finn Hjortgaard Christensen

  • Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Edward A. Fox;Peter Ingwersen;Raya Fidel

  • Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Emmanuel Yannakoudakis;Nicholas J. Belkin;Mun-Kew Leong;Peter Ingwersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Kalervo Järvelin
Kalervo Järvelin Tampere University
Nicholas J. Belkin
Nicholas J. Belkin Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jens F. Rehfeld
Jens F. Rehfeld University of Copenhagen
Diane Kelly
Diane Kelly University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Peter Willett
Peter Willett University of Sheffield
Edward A. Fox
Edward A. Fox Virginia Tech
Ingemar J. Cox
Ingemar J. Cox University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a range of in-demand careers and advanced study opportunities. Many students today choose flexible online programs to further enhance their skills or change career paths efficiently and affordably.

For those fascinated by big data, an online masters in data science provides strong technical training and direct preparation for fields like analytics, machine learning, and AI. If you're looking for a leadership role in a different sector, consider a fast track construction management degree. This path enables you to quickly enter project management and supervisory positions within the expanding construction industry.

Students who aspire to business leadership roles may benefit from the cheapest mba programs, which offer flexibility and advanced business knowledge compatible with a technical background. Additionally, there are online masters programs that allow for rapid completion so you can accelerate your career or pivot into new fields quickly.

Ultimately, online education provides numerous accessible, affordable, and specialized options for professionals looking to advance in technology, business, or related industries.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Ingwersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles