World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
72
Citations
20427
World Ranking
1680
National Ranking
49

Amanda Spink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Spink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 305 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amanda Spink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Spink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Amanda Spink is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their work spans multiple dimensions in academic research, contributing to the field through various avenues.

While there are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications listed for Amanda Spink, their ongoing association with a reputable institution indicates an active role in their academic community.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work have been provided, which limits detailed insights into their exact areas of research focus.

There are no documented awards or recognitions linked to Amanda Spink in the available data.

Overall, Amanda Spink's profile represents a researcher connected with Queensland University of Technology, with further details on their publications, field expertise, and collaborations not specified in the available information.

Best Publications

  • Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Tefko Saracevic

  • Searching the Web: the public and their queries

    Amanda Spink;Dietmar Wolfram;Major B. J. Jansen;Tefko Saracevic

  • How are we searching the world wide web?: a comparison of nine search engine transaction logs

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Judy Bateman;Tefko Saracevic

  • From e-sex to e-commerce: Web search changes

    A. Spink;B.J. Jansen;D. Wolfram;T. Saracevic

  • Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries

    Bernard J. Jansen;Danielle L. Booth;Amanda Spink

  • Human information behavior: Integrating diverse approaches and information use

    Amanda Spink;Charles Cole

  • Web Search: Public Searching of the Web

    Amanda Spink

  • From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance

    Amanda Spink;Howard Greisdorf;Judy Bateman

  • Determining the user intent of web search engine queries

    Bernard J. Jansen;Danielle L. Booth;Amanda Spink

  • An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 4: cognitive styles in information seeking

    Nigel Ford;T. D. Wilson;Allen Foster;David Ellis

  • Defining a session on Web search engines

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Chris Blakely;Sherry Koshman

  • Determining the informational, navigational and transactional intent of web queries

    Danielle Booth;Bernard Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • An analysis of web searching by European AlltheWeb.com users

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink

  • A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 2: uncertainty and its correlates

    T. D. Wilson;Nigel Ford;David Ellis;Allen Foster

  • Searching the Web: A survey of EXCITE users

    Amanda Spink;Judy Bateman;Bernard J. Jansen

  • Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of search terms

    Amanda Spink;Tefko Saracevic

  • Multitasking during web search sessions

    Amanda Spink;Minsoo Park;Bernard J. Jansen;Jan Pedersen

  • Web searcher interaction with the Dogpile.com metasearch engine

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Sherry Koshman

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard J. Jansen
Bernard J. Jansen Qatar Computing Research Institute
Tefko Saracevic
Tefko Saracevic Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Tom Wilson
Tom Wilson University of Sheffield
Nigel Ford
Nigel Ford University of Sheffield
C. Lee Giles
C. Lee Giles Pennsylvania State University
Jan O. Pedersen
Jan O. Pedersen Microsoft (United States)
Steve Lawrence
Steve Lawrence Google (United States)
Gary Marchionini
Gary Marchionini University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Herbert Van de Sompel
Herbert Van de Sompel Ghent University
Igor Jurisica
Igor Jurisica University Health Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a variety of online degrees and flexible career pathways. Many students start with the fastest associates degree programs, allowing them to build foundational skills and enter the workforce quickly. These accelerated programs can be an ideal stepping-stone to more advanced studies or specialized tech careers.

For those interested in leadership within education technology, options like the cheapest online doctorate in educational leadership offer an affordable route to high-level roles. A doctoral degree can help unlock opportunities in administration, policy, or advanced instructional design.

When pursuing online learning, choosing from good online colleges ensures your qualification is reputable and valued by employers. Accreditation and program quality should always be top considerations.

If your passion is in gaming and interactive development, specialized video game programs make it possible to study cutting-edge design and programming remotely. These courses can prepare you for dynamic roles in one of the world’s fastest-growing industries.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Spink

Recently Published Articles