World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Herbert Van de Sompel

Herbert Van de Sompel

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9429
World Ranking
7499
National Ranking
73

Herbert Van de Sompel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert Van de Sompel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 219 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Herbert Van de Sompel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert Van de Sompel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Herbert Van de Sompel is affiliated with Data Archiving and Networked Services in the Netherlands, contributing to the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Molecular Biology, and Information Systems and Management. The primary focus of their work involves Research Data Management Practices, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Web Data Mining and Analysis, Caching and Content Delivery, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, and Mobile Agent-Based Network Management.

Their notable publications include:

  • A 25 Year Retrospective on D-Lib Magazine, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Hashes are not suitable to verify fixity of the public archived web, 2023, PLoS ONE
  • Event Notifications in Value-Adding Networks, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Event Notifications and Event Logs, 2025, International Journal of Digital Curation
  • Practical webby FDOs With RO-Crate and FAIR Signposting, 2025, Open Conference Proceedings

These publications reflect work on digital curation, web archiving, event notifications, and FAIR data principles.

Herbert Van de Sompel has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Patrick Hochstenbach
  • Ruben Verborgh
  • Michael L. Nelson
  • Miel Vander Sande
  • Ruben Dedecker

Their work has appeared in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS ONE
  • International Journal of Digital Curation
  • Open Conference Proceedings
  • portal Libraries and the Academy

Herbert Van de Sompel's research addresses various aspects of digital preservation, web data analysis, and semantic web technologies. Their contributions span data management systems and methodologies that support the curation and accessibility of digital information across different domains within Computer Science.

Best Publications

  • Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community

    Xiaoming Liu;Johan Bollen;Michael L. Nelson;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Aric A. Hagberg;Ryan Chute

  • The open archives initiative: building a low-barrier interoperability framework

    Carl Lagoze;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting

    Carl Lagoze;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • Rethinking scholarly communication : building the system that scholars deserve

    Herbert van de Sompel;Sandy Payette;John Erickson;Carl Lagoze

  • Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Joan A. Smith;Rick Luce

  • Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Aric Hagberg;Luís M. A. Bettencourt;Luís M. A. Bettencourt

  • Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Michael L. Nelson;Carl Lagoze;Simeon Warner

  • The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Carl Lagoze

  • Open Linking in the Scholarly Information Environment Using the OpenURL Framework

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Oren Beit-Arie

  • A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL

    William Y. Arms;Diane Hillmann;Carl Lagoze;Dean B. Krafft

  • Scholarly context not found: one in five articles suffers from reference rot.

    Martin Klein;Herbert Van de Sompel;Robert Sanderson;Harihar Shankar

  • Reference linking in a hybrid library environment: part 1: frameworks for linking

    Herbert Van De Sompel;Patrick Hochstenbach

  • HTTP Framework for Time-Based Access to Resource States - Memento

    Unknown

  • Memento: Time Travel for the Web

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Michael L. Nelson;Robert Sanderson;Lyudmila L. Balakireva

  • Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting

    Herbert Van de Sompel

  • Using MPEG-21 DIDL to represent complex digital objects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Digital Library

    Jeroen Bekaert;Patrick Hochstenbach;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • The UPS Prototype: An Experimental End-User Service across E-Print Archives

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Thomas Krichel;Michael L. Nelson;Patrick Hochstenbach

  • Open Archives Initiative - Protocol for Metadata Harvesting - v.2.0

    Carl Lagoze;Herbert Van de Sompel;Michael Nelson;Simeon Warner

  • Advanced overview of version 2.0 of the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting

    Michael L. Nelson;Herbert Van de Sompel;Simeon Warner

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Bollen
Johan Bollen Indiana University
Carl Lagoze
Carl Lagoze University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christine L. Borgman
Christine L. Borgman University of California, Los Angeles
Ruben Verborgh
Ruben Verborgh Ghent University
Jane Hunter
Jane Hunter University of Technology Sydney
Luís M. A. Bettencourt
Luís M. A. Bettencourt University of Chicago
Allan R. Robinson
Allan R. Robinson Harvard University
Alyssa A. Goodman
Alyssa A. Goodman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Richard A. L. Jones
Richard A. L. Jones University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring further education in computer science opens diverse career paths, especially with the rise of flexible online degree options. For those looking to quickly transition into the workforce, there are short careers that pay well, which can be a strategic choice for fast-tracking your earning potential. Many of these programs offer specific tech-focused tracks, making it easier to land lucrative roles soon after graduation.

If you’re interested in emerging technologies, consider the growth of ai online degrees. These degrees provide affordable access to cutting-edge skills in artificial intelligence—one of the fastest-growing fields in tech.

When planning your academic journey, it’s important to research the best college majors for the future. Choosing a field with strong career outlooks ensures your investment in education pays off in the long run.

For professionals aiming to enhance their qualifications with minimal time commitment, exploring the easiest masters degree options can be a smart way to advance your expertise and job prospects without a prolonged study period.

Best Scientists Citing Herbert Van de Sompel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles