World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
11028
World Ranking
6401
National Ranking
2857

Carl Lagoze publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl Lagoze sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carl Lagoze D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl Lagoze sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carl Lagoze is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science and decision sciences, with a focus on interdisciplinary applications.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Research Synthesis Infrastructures: Shaping Knowledge in Education, 2020, Review of Research in Education
  • Provenance metadata for statistical data: An introduction to Structured Data Transformation Language (SDTL), 2020, IASSIST Quarterly
  • Metajelo: a Metadata Package for Journals to Support External Linked Objects, 2021, International Journal of Digital Curation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lagoze include:

  • J. W. Hammond
  • Pamela Moss
  • Minh Q. Huynh
  • George Alter
  • Darrell Donakowski

Key publication venues for Lagoze are:

  • Review of Research in Education
  • IASSIST Quarterly
  • International Journal of Digital Curation

Their main fields of study are:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

Within these fields, Lagoze has specialized in subfields such as:

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • General Health Professions

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range including:

  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Library Science and Information Systems

Best Publications

  • Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook

    Jean Christophe Plantin;Carl Lagoze;Paul N. Edwards;Christian Sandvig

  • The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science

    Brian L. Sullivan;Jocelyn L. Aycrigg;Jessie H. Barry;Rick E. Bonney

  • The open archives initiative: building a low-barrier interoperability framework

    Carl Lagoze;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • Dublin Core Metadata for Resource Discovery

    S. Weibel;J. Kunze;C. Lagoze;M. Wolf

  • The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting

    Carl Lagoze;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • Fedora: an architecture for complex objects and their relationships

    Carl Lagoze;Sandy Payette;Edwin Shin;Chris Wilper

  • Rethinking scholarly communication : building the system that scholars deserve

    Herbert van de Sompel;Sandy Payette;John Erickson;Carl Lagoze

  • The ABC Ontology and Model

    Carl Lagoze;Jane Hunter

  • Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration

    Martin Doerr;Jane Hunter;Carl Lagoze

  • Flexible and Extensible Digital Object and Repository Architecture (FEDORA)

    Sandra Payette;Carl Lagoze

  • The Warwick Framework: A Container Architecture for Diverse Sets of Metadata

    Carl Lagoze

  • Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Michael L. Nelson;Carl Lagoze;Simeon Warner

  • The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative

    Herbert Van de Sompel;Carl Lagoze

  • A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL

    William Y. Arms;Diane Hillmann;Carl Lagoze;Dean B. Krafft

  • The Warwick Framework: A Container Architecture for Aggregating Sets of Metadata

    Carl Lagoze;Clifford A. Lynch;Ron Daniel

  • Dienst: an architecture for distributed document libraries

    Carl Lagoze;James R. Davis

  • Focused Crawls, Tunneling, and Digital Libraries

    Donna Bergmark;Carl Lagoze;Alex Sbityakov

  • Defining Collections in Distributed Digital Libraries

    Carl Lagoze;David Fielding

  • Combining RDF and XML schemas to enhance interoperability between metadata application profiles

    Jane Hunter;Carl Lagoze

  • Core services in the architecture of the national science digital library (NSDL)

    Carl Lagoze;William Arms;Stoney Gan;Diane Hillmann

  • Advanced overview of version 2.0 of the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting

    Michael L. Nelson;Herbert Van de Sompel;Simeon Warner

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert Van de Sompel
Herbert Van de Sompel Ghent University
Weng-Keen Wong
Weng-Keen Wong Oregon State University
John M. Abowd
John M. Abowd Cornell University
Jane Hunter
Jane Hunter University of Technology Sydney
Carla P. Gomes
Carla P. Gomes Cornell University
Charles P. Friedman
Charles P. Friedman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
C. Lee Giles
C. Lee Giles Pennsylvania State University
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton
Stevan Harnad
Stevan Harnad University of Quebec at Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of online educational pathways ideal for diverse career goals. For those seeking quick entry into tech roles, consider quick certifications that pay well—these programs help learners upskill efficiently for in-demand jobs in IT, security, and data analysis.

If advancing or switching fields is your goal, enrolling in the fastest masters degree online options can accelerate your progress. These programs typically allow qualified applicants to complete their studies within 12-18 months.

When deciding which path to pursue, it's smart to explore the most useful masters degrees. Degrees in areas like computer science, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity are highly valued by employers and offer robust return on investment.

Don’t overlook the benefits of an associates degree online. This is a flexible, affordable way to gain foundational skills and start working in tech sooner, with the option to transfer credits toward a bachelor's later.

Best Scientists Citing Carl Lagoze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles