World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 60 539 502 32 32 165 18870

David Ahlstrom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Ahlstrom between 1961 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Ahlstrom published across 65 years, from 1961 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 26 of the 251 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 15 publications
1961 2025

251 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Ahlstrom: publications per year, 1961 to 2025
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 3
1972 3
1973 2
1974 0
1975 2
1976 3
1977 1
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 2
2000 5
2001 5
2002 6
2003 5
2004 7
2005 2
2006 5
2007 7
2008 9
2009 6
2010 13
2011 10
2012 15
2013 11
2014 10
2015 14
2016 8
2017 11
2018 7
2019 3
2020 11
2021 9
2022 7
2023 9
2024 11
2025 15
Total 251
Download as CSV

David Ahlstrom publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Ahlstrom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–169 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 165 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61 165
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

David Ahlstrom D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Ahlstrom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48 60
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David Ahlstrom is affiliated with Hong Kong Metropolitan University in China and has made contributions primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their research spans various subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics such as Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, Corporate Finance and Governance, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Family Business Performance and Succession, Innovation and Knowledge Management, and International Business and Foreign Direct Investment.

David Ahlstrom has authored several papers, including:

  • Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal, 2020, Journal of Management Studies
  • Temporal Strategies and Firms' Speedy Responses to COVID-19, 2020, Journal of Management Studies

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers including Badri Munir Sukoco, Sven Horak, Chia-Ling Lee, Shu-Yuan Chen, and Gongming Qian.

Their research has appeared regularly in journals such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • International Business Review
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Technovation
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Best Publications

  • Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective: Review paper

    Michael N. Young;Mike W. Peng;David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton

  • Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future?:

    Garry D. Bruton;David Ahlstrom;Han–Lin Li

  • Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future

    Garry D. Bruton;David Ahlstrom;Krzysztof Obloj

  • The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia

    Michael A. Hitt;David Ahlstrom;M. Tina Dacin;Edward Levitas

  • An institutional view of China's venture capital industry Explaining the differences between China and the West

    Garry D Bruton;David Ahlstrom

  • State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations

    Garry D. Bruton;Mike W. Peng;David Ahlstrom;Ciprian Stan

  • Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society

    David Ahlstrom

  • Venture Capital in Emerging Economies: Networks and Institutional Change

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton

  • Turnaround in East Asian firms: evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities

    Garry D. Bruton;David Ahlstrom;Johnny C. C. Wan

  • Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton

  • An institutional perspective on the role culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton

  • Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co-evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton

  • Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton;Kuang S. Yeh

  • Entrepreneurship in China: An overview

    David Ahlstrom;Zhujun Ding

  • Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia

    Garry D Bruton;David Ahlstrom;Tomas Puky

  • Venture capital in China: Past, present, and future

    David Ahlstrom;Garry D. Bruton;Kuang S. Yeh

  • An institution-based view of global IPR history

    Mike W. Peng;David Ahlstrom;Shawn M. Carraher;Weilei Stone Shi

  • Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective

    Raghu Garud;David Ahlstrom

  • High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: an empirical study

    Liang-Chih Huang;David Ahlstrom;Amber Yun-Ping Lee;Shu-Yuan Chen

  • Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal

    David Ahlstrom;Jean-Luc Arregle;Michael A. Hitt;Gongming Qian

  • Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm

    Michael N. Young;Terence Tsai;Xinran Wang;Shubo Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Garry D. Bruton
Garry D. Bruton Texas Christian University
Mike W. Peng
Mike W. Peng The University of Texas at Dallas
Silvio Vismara
Silvio Vismara University of Bergamo
Shawn M. Carraher
Shawn M. Carraher Harvard University
Neal M. Ashkanasy
Neal M. Ashkanasy University of Queensland
Michael A. Hitt
Michael A. Hitt Texas A&M University
Raghu Garud
Raghu Garud Pennsylvania State University
Douglas J. Cumming
Douglas J. Cumming Stevens Institute of Technology
Alain Verbeke
Alain Verbeke University of Calgary
John B. Cullen
John B. Cullen Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to boost your career in Business and Management. Flexible programs allow you to study while working, which can be especially valuable for those seeking advancement in highly competitive sectors.

For those interested in project leadership roles, a construction management online degree can open doors to thriving industries. Professionals aiming for upper management can opt for the best online executive mba programs designed for experienced leaders who want to deepen their expertise without putting their careers on hold.

Affordability is a major concern for many students. Seeking affordable graduate schools ensures you get quality education without significant financial strain. In today’s data-driven environment, an understanding of analytics is vital, making online data science programs increasingly popular among business professionals.

With so many specialized online degrees available, students have more options than ever to tailor their education to their career goals and stand out in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing David Ahlstrom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles