World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
9279
World Ranking
3852
National Ranking
1832

Charles P. Friedman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles P. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charles P. Friedman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles P. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles P. Friedman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on health professions and medicine, with a significant number of publications in general health professions, health information management, emergency medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, and information systems.

Their work addresses several specific topics, including electronic health records systems, health sciences research and education, health policy implementation science, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, biomedical text mining and ontologies, scientific computing and data management, and primary care and health outcomes.

Recent publications by Charles P. Friedman include the following papers:

  • What is unique about learning health systems? (2022) published in Learning Health Systems
  • Use of electronic health records to support a public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a perspective from 15 academic medical centers (2020) published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Should electronic differential diagnosis support be used early or late in the diagnostic process? A multicentre experimental study of Isabel (2021) published in BMJ Quality & Safety
  • Addressing the Covid-19 pandemic and future public health challenges through global collaboration and a data-driven systems approach (2020) published in Learning Health Systems
  • Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle (2021) published in BMJ Quality & Safety

Frequent co-authors include Jeremy C Wyatt, Joan S. Ash, Zach Landis-Lewis, Allen Flynn, and Amanda L. Missel.

Charles P. Friedman's research is often published in venues such as UNC Libraries, Learning Health Systems, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Research Ideas and Outcomes, and BMJ Quality & Safety.

In addition to journal articles, Friedman has contributed to book publications in the field of health informatics, including Evaluation Methods in Biomedical and Health Informatics (2022).

Best Publications

  • Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics

    Charles P. Friedman;J. Wyatt;Edward Hance Shortliffe

  • Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics (Health Informatics)

    Charles P. Friedman;Jeremy C. Wyatt

  • Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics

    Charles P. Friedman;Jeremy C. Wyatt

  • Achieving a Nationwide Learning Health System

    Charles P. Friedman;Adam K. Wong;David Blumenthal

  • Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System

    Charles P. Friedman;Joshua C. Rubin;Jeffrey S. Brown;Melinda Buntin

  • Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems.

    Charles P. Friedman;Arthur S. Elstein;Fredric M. Wolf;Gwendolyn C. Murphy

  • Development of Visual Diagnostic Expertise in Pathology: An Information-processing Study

    Rebecca S. Crowley;Gregory J. Naus;Jimmie Stewart;Charles P. Friedman

  • Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system

    William R. Hersh;M. Katherine Crabtree;David H. Hickam;Lynetta Sacherek

  • Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? Implications for decision support and error reduction.

    Charles P. Friedman;Guido G. Gatti;Timothy M. Franz;Gwendolyn C. Murphy

  • A “Fundamental Theorem” of Biomedical Informatics

    Charles P. Friedman

  • Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers

    Randy D. Cork;William M. Detmer;Charles P. Friedman

  • Charting the winds of change: evaluating innovative medical curricula.

    Charles P. Friedman;Ruth de Bliek;David S. Greer;Stewart P. Mennin

  • Toward an Information Infrastructure for Global Health Improvement.

    C. P. Friedman;J. C. Rubin;K. J. Sullivan

  • The research we should be doing.

    Charles P. Friedman

  • Designing Medical Informatics Research and Library—Resource Projects to Increase What Is Learned

    William W. Stead;R. Brian Haynes;Sherrilynne S. Fuller;Charles P. Friedman

  • The Attending Physician as Teacher

    William D. Mattern;Donn Weinholtz;Charles P. Friedman

  • Medical errors as a result of specialization

    Ahmad Hashem;Michelene T. H. Chi;Charles P. Friedman

  • An Analysis of Frameworks for Research on Innovation and Change in Higher Education

    David D. Dill;Charles P. Friedman

  • The science of Learning Health Systems: Foundations for a new journal.

    Charles P. Friedman;Nancy J. Allee;Brendan C. Delaney;Allen J. Flynn

  • Toward an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues.

    Bonnie Kaplan;Patricia Flatley Brennan;Alan F. Dowling;Charles P. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy C Wyatt
Jeremy C Wyatt University of Southampton
Paul V. A. Fine
Paul V. A. Fine University of California, Berkeley
Carl Lagoze
Carl Lagoze University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aziz Sheikh
Aziz Sheikh University of Oxford
Lucila Ohno-Machado
Lucila Ohno-Machado University of California, San Diego
Kevin Sullivan
Kevin Sullivan University of Virginia
Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University
Julia Adler-Milstein
Julia Adler-Milstein University of California, San Francisco
David Blumenthal
David Blumenthal Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers a range of online degree options that support diverse career pathways. For those interested in clinical psychology or advanced practice, psy d programs online provide the training needed to become a licensed psychologist while offering the convenience of distance learning.

If you are inclined toward helping families and couples, marriage and family therapy online programs offer flexible schedules and can quickly prepare students for roles in counseling and therapy settings.

For those seeking accessible and budget-friendly options, an online masters psychology degree opens doors to fields such as research, social services, and human resources, all while minimizing tuition costs.

Lastly, aspiring education leaders can benefit from online edd programs that offer fast-track formats, allowing for career advancement in administration, leadership, and policy making.

Each pathway provides unique advantages for flexible, career-focused learning within the broad spectrum of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Charles P. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles