World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 109 5667 5320 3050 2826 783 65173

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brahmajee K. Nallamothu between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brahmajee K. Nallamothu published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 30.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2017. 23 of the 815 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2017. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 39 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 46 publications 2017: 64 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 56 publications 2020: 53 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 3 publications
2000 2026

815 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 6
2002 9
2003 11
2004 3
2005 12
2006 24
2007 25
2008 32
2009 27
2010 27
2011 39
2012 28
2013 41
2014 40
2015 51
2016 46
2017 64
2018 47
2019 56
2020 53
2021 54
2022 28
2023 42
2024 25
2025 20
2026 3
Total 815
Download as CSV

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brahmajee K. Nallamothu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 783 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 783
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brahmajee K. Nallamothu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and health-related topics, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their scholarly output includes numerous publications in the field of medicine, among which cardiology and cardiovascular medicine stand as the most frequent subfield. Other subfields covered include emergency medicine, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, and surgery.

The main topics addressed in their work can be summarized as follows:

  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu has published extensively, with a notable presence in key journals and publication venues, including:

  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, their main coauthors are:

  • Jessica R. Golbus
  • Paul S. Chan
  • Michael P. Dorsch
  • Saket Girotra
  • Khadijah Breathett

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Brahmajee K. Nallamothu include:

  • Characteristics Associated With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes in an Academic Health Care System (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic (2020, JAMA Cardiology)
  • In-hospital cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with covid-19: multicenter cohort study (2020, BMJ)
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Bystander CPR for Witnessed Cardiac Arrest (2022, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • The Groundwater of Racial and Ethnic Disparities Research (2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes)

Best Publications

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • US Renal Data System 2018 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • US Renal Data System 2015 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.

    Rajiv Saran;Yi Li;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • US Renal Data System 2014 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Yi Li;Bruce Robinson;John Ayanian

  • New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults.

    Chad M. Brummett;Jennifer F. Waljee;Jenna Goesling;Stephanie Moser

  • Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures

    Reza Fazel;Harlan M. Krumholz;Yongfei Wang;Joseph S. Ross

  • US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • Trends in Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Saket Girotra;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;John A. Spertus;Yan Li

  • Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction.

    Elizabeth H. Bradley;Jeph Herrin;Yongfei Wang;Barbara A. Barton

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship;Steven R. Bailey

  • Hospital Delays in Reperfusion for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Implications When Selecting a Reperfusion Strategy

    Duane S. Pinto;Ajay J. Kirtane;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Sabina A. Murphy

  • Times to Treatment in Transfer Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 Analysis

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Eric R. Bates;Jeph Herrin;Yongfei Wang

  • Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

    Paul S. Chan;Harlan M. Krumholz;Graham Nichol;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu

  • Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study

    Akbar K Waljee;Mary A M Rogers;Paul Lin;Amit G Singal

  • Does This Woman Have an Acute Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection

    Stephen Bent;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;David L. Simel;Stephan D. Fihn

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Eric R. Bates

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States (vol 69, pg s7, 2017)

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C Abbott;Lawrence Yc Agodoa

  • ACCF/AHA/SCAI Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;James C. Blankenship

Frequent Co-Authors

Harlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz Yale University
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Sanjay Saint
Sanjay Saint University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeptha P. Curtis
Jeptha P. Curtis Yale University
Yongfei Wang
Yongfei Wang Yale University
John S. Rumsfeld
John S. Rumsfeld University of Colorado Denver
Theodore J. Iwashyna
Theodore J. Iwashyna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric R. Bates
Eric R. Bates University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph S. Ross
Joseph S. Ross Yale University
Frederick A. Masoudi
Frederick A. Masoudi University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following a traditional path to becoming a doctor. There are several online degree programs that offer accessible and flexible alternatives. One popular route for current registered nurses is to enroll in the cheapest rn to bsn program online, which helps expand their credentials and advance clinical skills while minimizing tuition costs.

For those without a nursing license but strong interest in patient care, entry level msn programs online can provide a direct pathway into advanced nursing roles—even for students with non-nursing bachelor’s degrees. If you’re seeking a more accessible entry point, learning about what is the easiest nursing program to get into can help identify less competitive programs.

Alternatively, there are rewarding, in-demand administrative positions like medical billing and coding. Many accredited programs are offered remotely—including online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa—making it possible to earn credentials with financial aid support. No matter your background, exploring these flexible online degrees can help you begin or advance your healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Brahmajee K. Nallamothu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles