World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Manesh R. Patel

Manesh R. Patel

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
78146
World Ranking
2893
National Ranking
1605

Manesh R. Patel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manesh R. Patel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 834 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Manesh R. Patel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manesh R. Patel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manesh R. Patel is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable contributions to several specialized subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Internal Medicine.

Their scholarly work encompasses a broad range of topics relevant to cardiovascular health and disease management. Key research themes include Peripheral Artery Disease Management, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management.

Manesh R. Patel's recent publications demonstrate active engagement with high-impact clinical research. Significant papers include:

  • Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Safety of the oral factor XIa inhibitor asundexian compared with apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (PACIFIC-AF): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase 2 study, 2022, The Lancet
  • SARS-CoV-2 Cardiac Involvement in Young Competitive Athletes, 2021, Circulation
  • Long-term outcomes after catheter-based renal artery denervation for resistant hypertension: final follow-up of the randomised SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Risk Factor Burden and Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association

They frequently collaborate with established researchers in their domain. Prominent co-authors include:

  • Marc P. Bonaca
  • W. Schuyler Jones
  • Sonia S. Anand
  • Mark R. Nehler
  • Scott D. Berkowitz

Manesh R. Patel publishes regularly in leading cardiovascular journals, reflecting the focus of their work. Key publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • American Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal

Best Publications

  • Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

    Manesh R. Patel;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Jyotsna Garg;Guohua Pan

  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

    Robert C. Hendel;Manesh R. Patel;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Poon

  • Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography

    Manesh R. Patel;Eric D. Peterson;David Dai;J. Matthew Brennan

  • Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

    Michael S. Conte;Andrew W. Bradbury;Philippe Kolh;John V. White

  • Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease

    Pamela S. Douglas;Udo Hoffmann;Manesh R. Patel;Daniel B. Mark

  • Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial

    Margaret M. Redfield;Horng H. Chen;Barry A. Borlaug;Marc J. Semigran

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

    J. E. Davies;S. Sen;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;R. Al-Lamee

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;John A. Bittl;Charles R. Bridges

  • ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

    Pamela S. Douglas;Mario J. Garcia;David E. Haines;Wyman W. Lai

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

    Manesh R. Patel;Gregory J. Dehmer;John W. Hirshfeld;Peter K. Smith

  • Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment

    Keith A. A. Fox;Jonathan P. Piccini;Daniel Wojdyla;Richard C. Becker

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, the American college of radiology, the American heart association, the American society of echocardiography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John McB Hodgson;Daniel Mark

  • Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial

    David E Kandzari;Michael Böhm;Felix Mahfoud;Felix Mahfoud;Raymond R Townsend

  • Catheter-based renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED): a randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial

    Raymond R Townsend;Felix Mahfoud;Felix Mahfoud;David E Kandzari;Kazuomi Kario

  • Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization

    Marc P Bonaca;Rupert M Bauersachs;Sonia S Anand;E Sebastian Debus

  • Detection of Myocardial Damage in Patients With Sarcoidosis

    Manesh R. Patel;Peter J. Cawley;John F. Heitner;Igor Klem

  • ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography

    Allen J. Taylor;Manuel Cerqueira;John Mc B. Hodgson;Daniel Mark

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth W. Mahaffey
Kenneth W. Mahaffey Stanford University
Jonathan P. Piccini
Jonathan P. Piccini Duke University
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Richard C. Becker
Richard C. Becker University of Cincinnati
Daniel E. Singer
Daniel E. Singer Harvard University
Graeme J. Hankey
Graeme J. Hankey University of Western Australia
Jonathan L. Halperin
Jonathan L. Halperin Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Scott D. Berkowitz
Scott D. Berkowitz University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
William R. Hiatt
William R. Hiatt University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for healthcare professionals in the USA continues to grow, and many students are looking for flexible ways to advance their careers. If you're interested in nursing, there are several accessible online pathways. For registered nurses aiming to further their education, rn to bsn online programs offer affordable options to earn a bachelor’s degree while continuing to work.

Students without a nursing background can consider online direct entry msn programs, which fast-track qualified individuals into advanced nursing roles. Those concerned about admissions competitiveness may benefit from exploring the easiest bsn program to get into, which highlights schools with less stringent acceptance criteria.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. Medical billing and coding is a growing field that can often be entered with a certificate or associate degree. Many online schools offer training opportunities, and it's possible to find medical billing and coding financial aid to help make these credentials more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Manesh R. Patel

Trending Scientists