World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
26
Citations
16314
World Ranking
1481
National Ranking
735

Scott Keeter publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Keeter sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 72 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Scott Keeter D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Keeter sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Keeter is affiliated with the Pew Research Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the social sciences, with particular attention to sociology, political science, and communication. Their work engages deeply with topics including survey methodology and nonresponse, privacy, security, and data protection, as well as social media and politics.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Scott Keeter is "Strategies for Detecting Insincere Respondents in Online Polling," published in 2021 in Public Opinion Quarterly. This publication has garnered academic attention with 27 citations.

Scott Keeter has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Arnold Lau, Courtney Kennedy, Nicholas Hatley, Andrew E. Mercer, and Joshua Ferno. Arnold Lau stands out as the most frequent co-author with two joint publications.

Their research contributions are predominantly featured in the journal Public Opinion Quarterly, which is the primary publication venue noted for Scott Keeter's work.

Core fields of study for Scott Keeter include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of study involve:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication

The main topics of their work cover the following areas:

  • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Media and Politics

Best Publications

  • What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters

    Michael X. Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter

  • Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey

    Scott Keeter;Carolyn Miller;Andrew Kohut;Robert M. Groves

  • Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First

    Michael X Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter

  • Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey

    Scott Keeter;Courtney Kennedy;Michael Dimock;Jonathan Best

  • A New Engagement

    Cliff Zukin;Scott Keeter;Molly Andolina;Krista Jenkins

  • The Civic and Political Health of the Nation: A Generational Portrait.

    Scott Keeter;Cliff Zukin;Molly Andolina;Krista Jenkins

  • THE ILLUSION OF INTIMACY TELEVISION AND THE ROLE OF CANDIDATE PERSONAL QUALITIES IN VOTER CHOICE

    Scott Keeter

  • STABILITY AND CHANGE IN THE U.S. PUBLIC'S KNOWLEDGE OF POLITICS

    Michael X. Delli Carini;Scott Keeter

  • Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change.

    Paul Taylor;Scott Keeter

  • Searching for the Meaning of Youth Civic Engagement: Notes From the Field

    Molly W. Andolina;Krista Jenkins;Scott Keeter;Cliff Zukin

  • What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys? The Impact of the Growing Cell-Only Population

    Scott Keeter;Courtney Kennedy;April Clark;Trevor Tompson

  • Theory and practice in non-probability surveys : parallels between causal inference and survey inference

    Andrew W. Mercer;Andrew W. Mercer;Frauke Kreuter;Frauke Kreuter;Scott Keeter;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government

    Michael X. Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter;J. David Kennamer

  • ESTIMATING TELEPHONE NONCOVERAGE BIAS WITH A TELEPHONE SURVEY

    Scott Keeter

  • The Internet and an Informed Citizenry

    Michael X Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter

  • Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections

    Unknown

  • The Impact of Cell Phone Noncoverage Bias on Polling in the 2004 Presidential Election

    Scott Keeter

  • How young people view their lives, futures and politics : A portrait of Generation Next

    Andrew Kohut;Kim Parker;Scott Keeter;Carroll Doherty

  • Transitions from Telephone Surveys to Self-Administered and Mixed-Mode Surveys: AAPOR Task Force Report

    Kristen Olson;Jolene D Smyth;Rachel Horwitz;Scott Keeter

  • What Should Be Learned through Service Learning

    Michael X. Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter

  • Does Mass Communication Change Public Opinion After All? A New Approach to Effects Analysis, <i>by James B. Lemert</i>

    Unknown

  • Is Civic Behavior Political? Exploring the Multidimensional Nature of Political Participation

    Krista Jenkins;Molly W. Andolina;Scott Keeter;Cliff Zukin

  • Cell-Phone-Only Voters in the 2008 Exit Poll and Implications for Future Noncoverage Bias

    Michael Mokrzycki;Scott Keeter;Courtney Kennedy

  • Presidential Address: Survey Research, Its New Frontiers, and Democracy

    Scott Keeter

  • The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge

    Michael X Delli Carpini;Scott Keeter

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael X. Delli Carpini
Michael X. Delli Carpini University of Pennsylvania
Frauke Kreuter
Frauke Kreuter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stanley Presser
Stanley Presser University of Maryland, College Park
Robert M. Groves
Robert M. Groves University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Elizabeth A. Stuart
Elizabeth A. Stuart Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science can open doors to a wide range of online degree options and dynamic career pathways. Many students who study political science also consider related disciplines to enhance their skills and broaden their career prospects.

For example, combining politics with environmental concerns can be a smart move. Learning more about the best paying jobs with environmental science degree may reveal opportunities in environmental policy or government agencies.

Similarly, strong analytical skills gained from a bachelor in mathematics online can be invaluable for data-driven policy analysis or political consulting roles. Students interested in research and public information often look to the best library science programs online for training in information management.

Finally, understanding the past is crucial for political scientists, so exploring degrees for history can strengthen critical thinking and contextual analysis skills. Each of these related fields supports diverse career options in government, education, nonprofits, and the private sector.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Keeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles