World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
42327
World Ranking
981
National Ranking
615

Jon A. Krosnick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Krosnick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jon A. Krosnick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Krosnick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jon A. Krosnick is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with 24 publications in social sciences and 7 in psychology. Subfields of study include sociology and political science, social psychology, political science and international relations, economics and econometrics, and statistics and probability.

The scientist's work encompasses various topics related to social behavior and political processes. Their main topics of research include:

  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Cultural differences and values
  • Survey methodology and nonresponse
  • Electoral systems and political participation
  • Names, identity, and discrimination research
  • Climate change communication and perception
  • Survey sampling and estimation techniques

Jon A. Krosnick has published several academic papers, including:

  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable (2023, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Resistance to purchasing all-electric vehicles: Evidence from a national survey (2023, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • Candidate name order effects in New Hampshire: Evidence from primaries and from general elections with party column ballots (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable (2024, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Lack of Replication or Generalization? Cultural Values Explain a Question Wording Effect (2021, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology)

The frequent publication venues for their work include Nature Human Behaviour, Journal of Environmental Psychology, PLoS ONE, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, and Climatic Change.

Jon A. Krosnick often collaborates with several researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Tobias Stark
  • Bo MacInnis
  • John Protzko
  • Leif D. Nelson
  • Brian A. Nosek

Throughout their career, Jon A. Krosnick has received multiple recognitions, such as being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2010, a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2009, and a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Jon A. Krosnick

  • Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences

    Richard E. Petty;Jon A. Krosnick

  • Attitude Strength: An Overview

    Jon A. Krosnick;Richard E. Petty

  • Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Melanie C. Green;J. O. N. A. Krosnick

  • Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming

    Jon A. Krosnick;Donald R. Kinder

  • National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality

    Linchiat Chang;Jon A. Krosnick

  • AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT

    Jon A. Krosnick;Duane F. Alwin

  • Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?

    Jon A. Krosnick;David S. Boninger;Yao C. Chuang;Matthew K. Berent

  • News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source

    Joanne M. Miller;Jon A. Krosnick

  • An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis

    Herbert F. Weisberg;Jon A. Krosnick;Bruce D. Bowen

  • Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations Over the Life Span

    Duane F. Alwin;Jon A. Krosnick

  • Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples

    David Scott Yeager;Jon A. Krosnick;Linchiat Chang;Harold S. Javitz

  • The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?

    Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;Matthew K. Berent;Richard T. Carson

  • Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys

    Jon A. Krosnick;Leandre R. Fabrigar

  • Aging and susceptibility to attitude change.

    Jon A. Krosnick;Duane F. Alwin

  • Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America

    Jon A. Krosnick

  • Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports Tests using the item count technique

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick

  • The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: a study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior.

    Jon A. Krosnick

  • An introduction to survey research and data analysis

    Herbert F. Weisberg;Jon A. Krosnick;Bruce D. Bowen

  • The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking

    Ariel Malka;Jon A. Krosnick;Gary Langer

  • Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels

    Reg Baker;Stephen J. Blumberg;J. Michael Brick

  • The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement: The Influence of Question and Respondent Attributes

    Duane F. Alwin;Jon A. Krosnick

  • Origins of attitude importance: self-interest, social identification, and value relevance.

    David S. Boninger;Jon A. Krosnick;Matthew K. Berent

Frequent Co-Authors

Allyson Holbrook
Allyson Holbrook University of Newcastle Australia
Stanley Presser
Stanley Presser University of Maryland, College Park
Richard T. Carson
Richard T. Carson University of California, San Diego
W. Michael Hanemann
W. Michael Hanemann Arizona State University
Josh Pasek
Josh Pasek University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
V. Kerry Smith
V. Kerry Smith Arizona State University
David S. Yeager
David S. Yeager The University of Texas at Austin
Raymond J. Kopp
Raymond J. Kopp Resources For The Future
Neil Malhotra
Neil Malhotra Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. One popular specialty is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which requires a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical experience. For those considering this path, it’s essential to understand state-specific certification standards.

For example, the Los Angeles mft certification requirements emphasize accredited graduate study, clinical internships, and passing recognized licensing exams. Requirements differ by location; aspiring therapists can check how to become an mft in Louisville or review details for other cities.

Educational milestones may include coursework, supervised practice, and ongoing professional development. If you’re interested in Texas, for instance, understanding the Lubbock mft education requirements is vital. Similarly, knowing how to become a marriage and family therapist in Madison is crucial for those aiming to practice in Wisconsin.

By choosing the right online psychology degree and familiarizing yourself with licensure requirements, you can build a rewarding career in therapy, counseling, or related mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jon A. Krosnick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles