World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7522 7014 4057 3686 129 7857

Frederick G. Conrad publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick G. Conrad between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick G. Conrad published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2013. 5 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2013. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1972 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick G. Conrad: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 7
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 6
2005 4
2006 5
2007 14
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 8
2012 6
2013 18
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 6
2018 7
2019 8
2020 14
2021 8
2022 1
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 167
Download as CSV

Frederick G. Conrad publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Conrad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frederick G. Conrad D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Conrad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frederick G. Conrad is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with a focus on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Transportation, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. This interdisciplinary approach covers a broad spectrum of topics related to social research and methodology.

Conrad's work explores various key topics including Survey Methodology and Nonresponse, Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Public Relations and Crisis Communication, and Social Media and Politics.

The scientist has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed papers published in several academic venues. Frequent publication sources include:

  • Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers in Human Behavior

Recent notable publications by Frederick G. Conrad are:

  • "Using Smartphones to Capture and Combine Self-Reports and Passively Measured Behavior in Social Research," 2021, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
  • "Respondent commitment: applying techniques from face-to-face interviewing to online collection of employment data," 2020, International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • "Do you have your smartphone with you? Behavioral barriers for measuring everyday activities with smartphone sensors," 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Interviewer Effects in Live Video and Prerecorded Video Interviewing," 2021, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
  • "Design Considerations for Live Video Survey Interviews," 2020, Survey Practice

Frederick G. Conrad frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Michael F. Schober
  • Ai Rene Ong
  • Kallan M. Larsen
  • Andrew L. Hupp
  • Florian Keusch

The breadth of Conrad's research demonstrates an integration of advanced social research methods with technological tools such as smartphones and video interviewing techniques, reflecting evolving practices within social science data gathering and analysis. Their collaboration network and publication record indicate sustained involvement in methodological development and applied social science research.

Best Publications

  • Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor.

    John R. Anderson;Frederick G. Conrad;Albert T. Corbett

  • Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions

    Roger Tourangeau;Mick P. Couper;Frederick Conrad

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales

    Mick P. Couper;Roger Tourangeau;Frederick G. Conrad;Eleanor Singer

  • Speeding in Web Surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining

    Chan Zhang;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Does Conversational Interviewing Reduce Survey Measurement Error

    Michael F. Schober;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Clarifying Question Meaning in a Household Telephone Survey

    Frederick G. Conrad;Michael F. Schober

  • Eye-Tracking Data New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding

    Mirta Galesic;Roger Tourangeau;Roger Tourangeau;Mick P. Couper;Frederick G. Conrad

  • What they see is what we get: response options for web surveys

    Mick P. Couper;Roger Tourangeau;Frederick G. Conrad;Scott D. Crawford

  • Color, Labels, and Interpretive Heuristics for Response Scales

    Roger Tourangeau;Mick P. Couper;Frederick Conrad

  • Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement

    Michael F. Schober;Josh Pasek;Lauren Guggenheim;Cliff Lampe

  • Strategies for estimating behavioural frequency in survey interviews.

    Frederick G. Conrad;Norman R. Brown;Erin R. Cashman

  • Sample Size for Cognitive Interview Pretesting

    Johnny Blair;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Folk Psychology of Mental Activities

    Lance J. Rips;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Visual context effects in web surveys

    Mick P. Couper;Frederick G. Conrad;Roger Tourangeau

  • Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples Craigslist, Google AdWords, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Christopher Antoun;Chan Zhang;Frederick G. Conrad;Michael F. Schober

  • Voting Technology: The Not-So-Simple Act of Casting a Ballot

    Paul S. Herrnson;Richard G. Niemi;Michael J. Hanmer;Benjamin B. Bederson

  • Misunderstanding Standardized Language in Research Interviews

    Michael F. Schober;Frederick G. Conrad;Scott S. Fricker

  • The Design of Grids in Web Surveys

    Mick P. Couper;Roger Tourangeau;Frederick G. Conrad;Chan Zhang

  • Living in History How War, Terrorism, and Natural Disaster Affect the Organization of Autobiographical Memory

    Norman R. Brown;Peter J. Lee;Mirna Krslak;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Cognitive representations of the future: Survey results

    Bruce Tonn;Angela Hemrick;Fred Conrad

  • Sources of Error in Cognitive Interviews

    Frederick G. Conrad;Johnny Blair

Frequent Co-Authors

Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Frauke Kreuter
Frauke Kreuter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Vicki A. Freedman
Vicki A. Freedman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frank P. Stafford
Frank P. Stafford University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Benjamin B. Bederson
Benjamin B. Bederson University of Maryland, College Park
Michael W. Traugott
Michael W. Traugott University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul S. Herrnson
Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut
Andrew Copas
Andrew Copas University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, especially in the field of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). For those interested in becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), meeting specific education and certification requirements is essential. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

The process for bcba certification requirements in Austin may vary slightly from other regions, but generally includes completing a master’s degree in a relevant field, obtaining supervised experience, and passing the BCBA exam. If you are looking for guidance on how to become a bcba in Bakersfield, you’ll find that most areas require similar steps, but it’s important to check specific local guidelines.

Those researching what’s needed for becoming a bcba in Baltimore or seeking advice on how to become a bcba in Boise will also benefit from accredited online psychology degree programs. These programs frequently prepare graduates for licensing and offer essential practical experience. With the growing demand for qualified behavior analysts, pursuing these pathways can offer rewarding and impactful career options.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick G. Conrad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles