World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Political Science
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
57
Citations
12590
World Ranking
144
National Ranking
88

R. Michael Alvarez publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Michael Alvarez sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 291 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

R. Michael Alvarez D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Michael Alvarez sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

R. Michael Alvarez is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States and has a research portfolio concentrated within the social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, political science and international relations, communication, as well as statistics and probability.

Their main research topics focus primarily on electoral systems and political participation, climate change communication and perception, digital games and media, social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, computational and text analysis methods, and environmental education and sustainability.

Alvarez has contributed to a significant number of publications in notable venues. These frequently include

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Social Science Quarterly
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Frontiers in Political Science
  • PLoS ONE

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Alvarez are:

  • "Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries," 2025, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "The politics of vaccine hesitancy in the United States," 2021, Social Science Quarterly
  • "Voting Experiences, Perceptions of Fraud, and Voter Confidence," 2021, Social Science Quarterly
  • "Hidden Donors: The Censoring Problem in U.S. Federal Campaign Finance Data," 2020, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
  • "Social media enables people-centric climate action in the hard-to-decarbonise building sector," 2022, Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborators include Ramit Debnath, Jacob Morrier, Daniel Ebanks, Jian Cao, and Seo-young Silvia Kim, reflecting a diverse network of academic partnerships.

Alvarez's book publications include titles appearing with Cambridge University Press and the California Institute of Technology. Notably, they authored "Securing American Elections" (2020) with Cambridge University Press and "Securing American Elections: How Data-Driven Election Monitoring Can Improve Our Democracy" (2020) with the California Institute of Technology.

In recognition of their scholarly contributions, Alvarez was named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion

    R. Michael Alvarez;John Brehm

  • GOVERNMENT PARTISANSHIP, LABOR ORGANIZATION, AND MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

    R. Michael Alvarez;Geoffrey Garrett;Peter Lange

  • When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values

    R. Michael Alvarez;John Brehm;Stable Url

  • Information and elections

    R. Michael Alvarez

  • A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Information and Elections

    Unknown

  • The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 Election

    R. Michael Alvarez;Lisa García Bedolla

  • Economics, Entitlements and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies

    R. Michael Alvarez;John Brehm

  • Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall;Alexander H. Trechsel

  • The Race Gap in Student Achievement Scores: Longitudinal Evidence from a Racially Diverse School District

    Valentina A. Bali;R. Michael Alvarez

  • Strategic Voting In British Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Frederick J. Boehmke;Jonathan Nagler

  • Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections, 1980-1992

    Carole Kennedy Chaney;R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jason L. Saving

  • Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler;Shaun Bowler

  • Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall;Morgan H. Llewellyn

  • Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Point, Click, and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall

  • Uncertainty and Political Perceptions

    R. Michael Alvarez;Charles H. Franklin

  • The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Two-Stage Estimation of Nonrecursive Choice Models

    R. Michael Alvarez;Garrett Glasgow

  • Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall

  • Controlling Democracy: The Principal–Agent Problems in Election Administration

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall

  • Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation about the Internal Revenue Service

    R. Michael Alvarez;John Brehm;Stable Url

  • Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation

    R. Michael Alvarez;Thad E. Hall;Susan D. Hyde

  • Congressional Committees and the Political Economy of Federal Outlays

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jason L. Saving

  • Subject Acquisition for Web-Based Surveys

    R. Michael Alvarez;Robert P. Sherman;Carla VanBeselaere

  • The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015

    Kristjan Vassil;Mihkel Solvak;Priit Vinkel;Alexander H. Trechsel

  • Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections:

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data

    R. Michael Alvarez

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Nagler
Jonathan Nagler New York University
Lonna Rae Atkeson
Lonna Rae Atkeson Florida State University
D. Roderick Kiewiet
D. Roderick Kiewiet California Institute of Technology
Alexander H. Trechsel
Alexander H. Trechsel University of Lucerne
Stephen Ansolabehere
Stephen Ansolabehere Harvard University
Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Frederick J. Boehmke
Frederick J. Boehmke University of Iowa
Geoffrey Garrett
Geoffrey Garrett University of Southern California
Nathaniel Beck
Nathaniel Beck New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science graduates often find versatile career pathways both inside and outside government. If you want to expand your opportunities, there are many related online degrees to consider. For budget-conscious learners, exploring the cheapest online university options can make advancing your education more affordable without sacrificing quality.

Interested in interdisciplinary fields? Degrees in environmental science or mathematics give you additional tools for data analysis and policy creation. Explore your options for environmental science degree jobs salary potential and discover how analytical skills from an online bachelor's degree mathematics can boost your employability in public and private sectors.

If you’re passionate about information management or academia, library science is another relevant field. Review the best online library science programs to see how this degree complements a Political Science background, especially for research-oriented careers. Exploring these pathways helps match your interests and strengths with emerging job markets.

Best Scientists Citing R. Michael Alvarez

Trending Scientists