His main research concerns Politics, Law and economics, Status quo, Foreign policy and Disease. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Law and economics, focusing on Use of force and, on occasion, Government, Deterrence and Deterrence theory. His study in Status quo is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Democracy and State.
His Democracy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Social psychology, Dyad, Unit of analysis and Scholarship. His State research incorporates elements of Public administration, Territorial dispute and Negotiation. His Foreign policy study combines topics in areas such as Social research, Social science and International conflict.
Paul K. Huth mainly focuses on Political economy, Politics, Democracy, Law and Law and economics. Foreign policy analysis is closely connected to Development economics in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Political economy. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Use of force and Negotiation.
His study on Democracy also encompasses disciplines like
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Political economy, Ranking, Ledger, International law and Malnutrition. The Political economy study combines topics in areas such as Political geography, Internal conflict, State and Mobilization. Ranking is integrated with Financial economics and Actuarial science in his study.
His International law research includes elements of Peaceful resolution, International economics, Comparative law and Foreign direct investment. Paul K. Huth has researched Malnutrition in several fields, including Social policy and Development economics.
Paul K. Huth mostly deals with International law, International economics, Foreign direct investment, Positive economics and Politics. His research integrates issues of International relations and Reputation in his study of Positive economics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Decision Making during International Crises Is Quality of Process Related to Outcome
Gregory M. Herek;Irving L. Janis;Paul Huth.
Journal of Conflict Resolution (1987)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
Yale University
University of Maryland, College Park
University of California, Davis
University of Maryland, College Park
George Mason University
Yale University
Emory University
Stanford University
Columbia University
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Luleå University of Technology
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Maryland, College Park
Nokia (United States)
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Dalian University of Technology
Shandong University of Science and Technology
University of California, San Francisco
University of Tokyo
University of Sydney
George Mason University
Oregon Health & Science University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Duke University
University of California, San Francisco
Boston College