World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
27
Citations
8304
World Ranking
1410
National Ranking
701

Allan C. Stam publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan C. Stam sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 62 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Allan C. Stam D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan C. Stam sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 27 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allan C. Stam is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their work is primarily focused in the field of Health Professions, with a subfield concentration in General Health Professions. The main topic of their research revolves around Health and Conflict Studies.

Stam's recent scholarly output includes a paper titled Casualty Estimates in the Rwandan Genocide, published in 2020 in the Journal of Genocide Research. This publication has contributed to academic discussions related to health impacts in conflict settings and has been cited multiple times.

The scientist collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • David Armstrong
  • Christian Davenport

Stam's work is often published in venues related to conflict and health studies, with the Journal of Genocide Research being a notable platform for dissemination.

The research topics covered by Stam focus on intersections of health and conflict, which is reflected in the publication record and choice of publication venues.

Best Publications

  • Democracies at War

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam

  • Eugene: A conceptual manual

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • Bargaining and the Nature of War

    Alastair Smith;Allan C. Stam

  • Democracy, War Initiation, and Victory

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam

  • Win, lose, or draw : domestic politics and the crucible of war

    Allan C. Stam

  • The Behavioral Origins of War

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam Iii

  • How Prior Military Experience Influences The Future Militarized Behavior Of Leaders

    Michael C. Horowitz;Allan C. Stam

  • The Declining Advantages of Democracy: A Combined Model of War Outcomes and Duration

    Scott D. Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • Democracy and Battlefield Military Effectiveness

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam

  • In the Nick of Time: Conflict Management, Mediation Timing, and the Duration of Interstate Disputes

    Patrick M. Regan;Allan C. Stam

  • Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads: When Decisions Matter

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • Mediation and Peacekeeping in a Random Walk Model of Civil and Interstate War

    Alastair Smith;Allan C. Stam

  • Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations:

    Michael Horowitz;Rose McDermott;Allan C. Stam

  • Why Leaders Fight

    Michael C. Horowitz;Allan C. Stam;Cali M. Ellis

  • Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam

  • Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions

    Fiona McGillivray;Allan C. Stam

  • A Universal Test of an Expected Utility Theory of War

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • Courting Disaster: An Expanded NATO vs. Russia and China

    Bruce Russett;Allan C. Stam

  • Understanding Victory: Why Political Institutions Matter

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam

  • A Revised Look at Interstate Wars, 1816–2007:

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam;Michael C. Horowitz

  • Introducing the LEAD Data Set

    Cali Mortenson Ellis;Michael C. Horowitz;Allan C. Stam

  • Domestic Institutions and Wartime Casualties

    Michael C. Horowitz;Erin M. Simpson;Allan C. Stam

  • Domestic Signaling of Commitment Credibility: Military Recruitment and Alliance Formation

    Michael C. Horowitz;Paul Poast;Allan C. Stam

  • Sizing Up the Adversary: Leader Attributes and Coercion in International Conflict

    Michael C. Horowitz;Philip Potter;Todd S. Sechser;Allan Stam

  • Predicting the Length of the 2003 U.S.-Iraq War

    D. Scott Bennett;Allan C. Stam

  • A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1:

    Dan Reiter;Allan C. Stam;Michael C. Horowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Dan Reiter
Dan Reiter Emory University
Alastair Smith
Alastair Smith New York University
Christian Davenport
Christian Davenport University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bruce Russett
Bruce Russett Yale University
Rose McDermott
Rose McDermott Brown University
Patrick M. Regan
Patrick M. Regan University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities. For those interested in data analysis and research, pursuing a mathematics bachelor degree online can provide valuable quantitative skills that complement political research and policy analysis.

Professionals aiming to work in information management and archiving may consider the best online library science programs. These programs teach essential skills in curation, organization, and information retrieval—areas increasingly important in governmental agencies and public institutions.

Interested in history and its impact on modern politics? Discover how long does it take to get a history degree to see if you can combine your passion for history with policy-making or educational careers.

Finally, many students benefit from flexible, broad-based education. An interdisciplinary degree can lead to diverse roles across the public and private sectors. To learn more about job prospects, check out the interdisciplinary studies major salary and see what paths may fit your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Allan C. Stam

Trending Scientists