World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 42 428 384 238 203 192 10149

Rose McDermott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rose McDermott between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rose McDermott published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2009. 9 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2009. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1991 2025

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rose McDermott: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 7
2005 6
2006 6
2007 20
2008 7
2009 25
2010 14
2011 16
2012 21
2013 8
2014 17
2015 6
2016 9
2017 20
2018 10
2019 10
2020 8
2021 3
2022 7
2023 8
2024 6
2025 3
Total 255
Download as CSV

Rose McDermott publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose McDermott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–195 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 192 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27 192
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Rose McDermott D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose McDermott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26 42
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Rose McDermott is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology, political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology

Rose McDermott has published numerous papers in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Politics and the Life Sciences
  • International Security
  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Some of the notable recent papers are:

  • The Psychology of Nuclear Brinkmanship (2023), published in International Security
  • Ethics in field experimentation: A call to establish new standards to protect the public from unwanted manipulation and real harms (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • On the scientific study of small samples: Challenges confronting quantitative and qualitative methodologies (2023), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence (2022), published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The Past, Present, and Future of Behavioral IR (2020), published in International Organization

Coauthor collaborations are an important aspect of their work. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Peter Hatemi
  • Reid B.C. Pauly
  • James Druckman
  • Susan Hyde
  • Luke Glowacki

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Rose McDermott was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Risk-taking in international politics : prospect theory in American foreign policy

    Rose McDermott

  • Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation

    Rose McDermott;Dustin Tingley;Jonathan Cowden;Giovanni Frazzetto

  • Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice

    James N. Druckman;Rose McDermott

  • The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science

    Rose McDermott

  • EXPERIMENTAL METHODS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

    Rose McDermott

  • The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States

    Valerie M. Hudson;Mary Caprioli;Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill;Rose McDermott

  • Measuring identity : a guide for social scientists

    Rawi Abdelal;Yoshiko M. Herrera;Alastair Iain Johnston;Rose McDermott

  • Political Psychology in International Relations

    Rose McDermott

  • Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone

    Dominic D.P Johnson;Rose McDermott;Emily S Barrett;Jonathan Cowden

  • Prospect Theory in Political Science: Gains and Losses From the First Decade

    Rose McDermott

  • An Experimental Template for Case Study Research

    John Gerring;Rose McDermott

  • Experimental Methodology in Political Science

    Rose McDermott

  • The genetics of politics: discovery, challenges, and progress

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations

    Peter K Hatemi;Sarah E Medland;Robert Klemmensen;Sven Oskarsson

  • Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations:

    Michael Horowitz;Rose McDermott;Allan C. Stam

  • Breaking Up Is Hard to Do, Unless Everyone Else Is Doing It Too: Social Network Effects on Divorce in a Longitudinal Sample

    Rose McDermott;James H. Fowler;Nicholas A. Christakis

  • Fear as a Disposition and an Emotional State: A Genetic and Environmental Approach to Out‐Group Political Preferences

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott;Lindon J. Eaves;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Prospect theory in international relations: The Iranian hostage rescue mission.

    Rose McDermott

  • Finger length ratio (2D : 4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game

    Matthew H. McIntyre;Emily S. Barrett;Rose McDermott;Dominic D.P. Johnson

  • The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives

    Casey A. Klofstad;Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure.

    Luke Glowacki;Alexander Isakov;Richard W. Wrangham;Rose McDermott

  • Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, biology, and politics

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • States in Mind: Evolution, Coalitional Psychology, and International Politics

    Anthony C. Lopez;Rose McDermott;Michael Bang Petersen

  • The WomanStats Project Database: Advancing an Empirical Research Agenda

    Mary Caprioli;Valerie M. Hudson;Rose Mcdermott;Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill

  • A Neurobiological Approach to Foreign Policy Analysis: Identifying Individual Differences in Political Violence

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • New Directions for Experimental Work in International Relations

    Rose Mcdermott

  • Distinguishing Sex and Gender

    Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • Give Me Attitudes

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction

    Casey A. Klofstad;Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • The expected prospects for peace in Northern Ireland

    Bruce Bueno de Mesquita;Rose McDermott;Emily Cope

  • Ethics in field experimentation: A call to establish new standards to protect the public from unwanted manipulation and real harms.

    Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • The Different Effects of Gender and Sex on Vote Choice

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott;J. Michael Bailey;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Introduction: What is a 'gene' and why does it matter for political science?

    Peter K Hatemi;Peter K Hatemi;Enda Byrne;Rose McDermott

  • Mutual Interests: The Case for Increasing Dialogue between Political Science and Neuroscience

    Rose McDermott

  • Emerging Models of Collaboration in Political Science: Changes, Benefits, and Challenges

    Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • "Blunt Not the Heart, Enrage It": The Psychology of Revenge and Deterrence (November 2017)

    Rose McDermott;Anthony C. Lopez;Peter K. Hatemi

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Hatemi
Peter K. Hatemi Pennsylvania State University
Alastair Iain Johnston
Alastair Iain Johnston Harvard University
Cheryl Koopman
Cheryl Koopman Stanford University
James H. Fowler
James H. Fowler University of California, San Diego
Dustin Tingley
Dustin Tingley Harvard University
Robert Jervis
Robert Jervis Columbia University
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita New York University
Nicholas A. Christakis
Nicholas A. Christakis Yale University
Philip G. Zimbardo
Philip G. Zimbardo Stanford University
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring political science often opens doors to various academic and career options. Many students find that related fields like interdisciplinary studies provide a flexible academic path, blending politics, economics, and sociology. Interested in earning potential? It’s worth researching the interdisciplinary studies degree salary to understand average earnings in these careers.

History is closely tied to political studies, and specializing further with a master's in american history online can sharpen research, analysis, and writing skills. For those who need a faster credential for career advancement, pursuing a 6 month master's degree online could be a practical alternative.

Finally, for graduates wanting quicker entry into the workforce, there are a variety of certification programs related to government, policy, or public service that offer strong salaries and job prospects. No matter your career goals, multiple online pathways can align with your interests in politics and governance.

Best Scientists Citing Rose McDermott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles