World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
27
Citations
7128
World Ranking
1416
National Ranking
707

John R. Alford publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Alford sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 58 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

John R. Alford D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Alford sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 27 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Alford is affiliated with Rice University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of neuroscience and psychology, with a specific emphasis on sensory systems and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's recent paper titled Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone, published in 2020 in the journal Politics and the Life Sciences, addresses the relationship between sensory detection and political attitudes. This publication has attracted citations reflecting attention within the research community.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John R. Alford include:

  • Amanda Friesen
  • Mike Gruszczynski
  • Kevin B. Smith
  • John R. Hibbing

John R. Alford's work has appeared in the following publication venue:

  • Politics and the Life Sciences

Their main fields of study are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

The subfields informing their research include:

  • Sensory Systems
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Key topics central to John R. Alford's research activity are:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Best Publications

  • Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted

    John R. Alford;Carolyn L. Funk;John R. Hibbing

  • Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits

    Douglas R. Oxley;Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford;Matthew V. Hibbing

  • Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.

    John R. Hibbing;Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford

  • Disgust Sensitivity and the Neurophysiology of Left-Right Political Orientations

    Kevin B. Smith;Douglas R. Oxley;Matthew V. Hibbing;John R. Alford

  • Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences

    John R. Hibbing;Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford

  • The Politics of Mate Choice

    John R. Alford;Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • The Electoral Impact of Economic Conditions: Who is Held Responsible?

    John R. Hibbing;John R. Alford

  • Can Government Regulate Safety? The Coal Mine Example

    Michael S. Lewis-Beck;John R. Alford

  • The Origin of Politics: An Evolutionary Theory of Political Behavior

    John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing

  • Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs

    Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Hibbing;Sarah E. Medland;Matthew C. Keller

  • Is There a “Party” in Your Genes?:

    Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House

    John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing

  • Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology

    Kevin B. Smith;Douglas R. Oxley;Matthew V. Hibbing;John R. Alford

  • Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology

    Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Cooperators

    John R. Hibbing;John R. Alford

  • Nonpolitical Images Evoke Neural Predictors of Political Ideology

    Woo Young Ahn;Kenneth T. Kishida;Xiaosi Gu;Xiaosi Gu;Terry Lohrenz

  • Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Orientations

    Carolyn L. Funk;Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford;Matthew V. Hibbing

  • Biology, Ideology, and Epistemology: How Do We Know Political Attitudes Are Inherited and Why Should We Care?

    Kevin Smith;John R Alford;Peter K. Hatemi;Lindon J. Eaves

  • Television Markets and Congressional Elections

    James E. Campbell;John R. Alford;Keith Henry

  • Personal, Interpersonal, and Political Temperaments

    John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing

  • Overdraft: The Political Cost of Congressional Malfeasance

    John Alford;Holly Teeters;Daniel S. Ward;Rick K. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hibbing
John R. Hibbing University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kevin B. Smith
Kevin B. Smith University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Peter K. Hatemi
Peter K. Hatemi Pennsylvania State University
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
P. Read Montague
P. Read Montague Virginia Tech
Xiaosi Gu
Xiaosi Gu Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Matthew C. Keller
Matthew C. Keller Washington University in St. Louis
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA offers a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose to combine their political science studies with interdisciplinary fields, and pursuing a cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree can broaden career possibilities in government, non-profit organizations, or consultancy.

For those interested in the analytical side of politics, an online bachelor’s in mathematics can strengthen skills in data analysis, statistics, and research—highly valuable in policy research and political consulting.

If you’re passionate about historical context and critical thinking, pairing Political Science with a history degree offers a strong foundation in understanding political trends and ideologies.

Careers in government and public policy also frequently intersect with information management. Graduates sometimes pursue further study at the best colleges for library science to develop expertise in organizing and accessing public information and records, supporting effective research and advocacy efforts.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Alford

Trending Scientists