World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
15691
World Ranking
4728
National Ranking
2626

Nicholas R. Eaton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas R. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicholas R. Eaton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas R. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas R. Eaton is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a substantial number of publications in the field. The main fields of study include Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Philosophy, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work extensively covers topics related to mental health and psychiatric research. Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment

Nicholas R. Eaton has published numerous papers, with notable recent works including:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence, 2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • Longitudinal impact of gender-affirming endocrine intervention on the mental health and well-being of transgender youths: preliminary results, 2020, International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research, 2022, Psychological Medicine

The frequent co-authors associated with their work include:

  • Roman Kotov
  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Miriam K. Forbes
  • Irwin D. Waldman
  • Colin G. DeYoung

Nicholas R. Eaton regularly publishes in several journals, with multiple works appearing in:

  • World Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Nature Mental Health

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • An invariant dimensional liability model of gender differences in mental disorder prevalence: evidence from a national sample.

    Nicholas R. Eaton;Katherine M. Keyes;Robert F. Krueger;Steve Balsis

  • Childhood maltreatment and the structure of common psychiatric disorders

    Katherine M. Keyes;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The structure of psychopathology: Toward an expanded quantitative empirical model.

    Aidan G. C. Wright;Robert F. Krueger;Megan J. Hobbs;Kristian E. Markon

  • Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5.

    Robert F. Krueger;Nicholas R. Eaton;Lee Anna Clark;David Watson

  • Transdiagnostic factors of mental disorders.

    Robert F. Krueger;Nicholas R. Eaton

  • Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology.

    Robert F. Krueger;Nicholas R. Eaton

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Borderline personality disorder co-morbidity: relationship to the internalizing-externalizing structure of common mental disorders.

    Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Katherine M. Keyes;Andrew E. Skodol

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • The structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders.

    Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Kristian E. Markon;Katherine M. Keyes

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Gender Cognition in Transgender Children

    Kristina R. Olson;Aidan C. Key;Nicholas R. Eaton

  • Personality in DSM–5: Helping Delineate Personality Disorder Content and Framing the Metastructure

    Robert F. Krueger;Nicholas R. Eaton;Jaime Derringer;Kristian E. Markon

  • Transdiagnostic factors of psychopathology and substance use disorders: a review

    Nicholas R. Eaton;Craig Rodriguez-Seijas;Natacha Carragher;Robert F. Krueger

  • Disorders without borders: current and future directions in the meta-structure of mental disorders

    Natacha Carragher;Robert F. Krueger;Nicholas R. Eaton;Tim Slade

  • The hierarchical structure of common mental disorders: Connecting multiple levels of comorbidity, bifactor models, and predictive validity.

    Hyunsik Kim;Nicholas R. Eaton

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Deborah S. Hasin
Deborah S. Hasin Columbia University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Kristian E. Markon
Kristian E. Markon University of Iowa
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Susan C. South
Susan C. South Purdue University West Lafayette
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Kelsie T. Forbush
Kelsie T. Forbush University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to various rewarding careers, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. As the demand for qualified professionals continues to grow, many students are turning to online psychology programs to begin their journey.

It’s important to note that each location in the USA has its own professional standards and requirements for substance abuse counselors. For example, Cleveland substance abuse counselor certification requirements might differ from those in other regions. If you are interested in becoming a counselor in Colorado, you can learn about the specific steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Colorado Springs.

Similarly, students who wish to pursue this pathway in Ohio can review the guidelines on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Columbus. In Texas, you’ll find that Corpus Christi substance abuse counselors education requirements may have their own criteria.

If you are passionate about helping others, an online psychology degree can be a flexible, valuable first step toward a meaningful career in substance abuse counseling, with tailored pathways depending on your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas R. Eaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles