World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miriam K. Forbes

Miriam K. Forbes

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
11214
World Ranking
6855
National Ranking
405

Miriam K. Forbes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam K. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Miriam K. Forbes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam K. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriam K. Forbes is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research work is primarily concentrated in the field of psychology, with a significant focus on clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additionally, their work touches on philosophy, psychiatry and mental health, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research topics span a broad range of mental health and psychological issues, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Forbes has contributed to multiple recent papers, demonstrating engagement with developments in psychopathology taxonomies and psychiatric practice. Notable publications include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence (2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology)
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum (2021, World Psychiatry)
  • Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research (2022, Psychological Medicine)

Frequent co-authors in Forbes's research include:

  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Roman Kotov
  • Aidan G.C. Wright
  • Nicholas R. Eaton
  • Matthew Sunderland

Their work is regularly published in a range of journals, showing an emphasis on clinical and psychological science. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Psychological Medicine
  • World Psychiatry
  • Psychological Methods

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • Adolescent development and risk for the onset of social-emotional disorders: a review and conceptual model

    Ronald M. Rapee;Ella L. Oar;Carly J. Johnco;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability.

    Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.

    Ashley L. Greene;Nicholas R. Eaton;Kaiqiao Li;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Repeated Ketamine Infusions for Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Treatment-Resistant Depression.

    C. Sophia Albott;Kelvin O. Lim;Miriam K. Forbes;Christopher Erbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research

    Unknown

  • Beyond comorbidity: Toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span

    Miriam K. Forbes;Jennifer L. Tackett;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

  • Depression, Anxiety, and Peer Victimization: Bidirectional Relationships and Associated Outcomes Transitioning from Childhood to Adolescence

    Miriam K. Forbes;Sally Fitzpatrick;Natasha R. Magson;Ronald M. Rapee

  • Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model.

    Whitney R. Ringwald;Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright

  • A review of approaches and models in psychopathology conceptualization research

    Unknown

  • Sexual Quality of Life and Aging: A Prospective Study of a Nationally Representative Sample

    Miriam K. Forbes;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function

    Miriam K. Forbes;Andrew J. Baillie;Carolyn A. Schniering

  • Delineating the joint hierarchical structure of clinical and personality disorders in an outpatient psychiatric sample

    Miriam K. Forbes;Roman Kotov;Camilo J. Ruggero;David Watson

  • The Great Recession and Mental Health in the United States

    Miriam K. Forbes;Robert F. Krueger

  • Further evidence that psychopathology networks have limited replicability and utility: Response to Borsboom et al. (2017) and Steinley et al. (2017).

    Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Kristian E. Markon
Kristian E. Markon University of Iowa
Camilo J. Ruggero
Camilo J. Ruggero University of North Texas
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Irwin D. Waldman
Irwin D. Waldman Emory University
Matthew Sunderland
Matthew Sunderland University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open the door to diverse online degrees and specialized career options. Many students are interested in what jobs are in sports psychology, a growing field focused on helping athletes enhance performance and cope with pressure. Careers in sports psychology may include working with professional teams, schools, or private organizations.

Those considering clinical roles often wonder about the differences between therapists and psychologists. Understanding what is a clinical psychologist vs therapist is important for selecting the right program and licensure path. Typically, clinical psychologists require a doctoral degree, while therapists may hold master’s credentials and focus on a range of mental health services.

Advanced education also broadens potential career opportunities. You can learn more about the career paths for phd in psychology—including academic, clinical, and research roles. Conversely, if you’re attracted to sports psychology, find out how much can you earn with a master's in sports psychology and the types of roles available with a master’s-level education.

Best Scientists Citing Miriam K. Forbes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles