World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miriam K. Forbes

Miriam K. Forbes

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6852 6386 405 395 147 11214

Miriam K. Forbes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miriam K. Forbes between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miriam K. Forbes published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2021. 10 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miriam K. Forbes: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 3
2014 3
2015 4
2016 7
2017 15
2018 8
2019 16
2020 13
2021 33
2022 20
2023 19
2024 13
2025 9
2026 1
Total 165
Download as CSV

Miriam K. Forbes publications per year - data summary

  • Miriam K. Forbes, a Psychology scholar from Macquarie University, has 165 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2005 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2005 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 22 years in the span carry no publications at all (2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.0 per year counting only the 15 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 62 publications, 38% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2005-2012: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 2013-2020: 69 publications (8.6 per year); 2021-2026: 95 publications (15.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Miriam K. Forbes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam K. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Miriam K. Forbes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Miriam K. Forbes, a Psychology scholar from Macquarie University, records 147 publications - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Miriam K. Forbes, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Miriam K. Forbes ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Miriam K. Forbes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam K. Forbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Miriam K. Forbes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Miriam K. Forbes, a Psychology scholar from Macquarie University, records 44 D-Index - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Miriam K. Forbes, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Miriam K. Forbes ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Miriam K. Forbes is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research work is primarily concentrated in the field of psychology, with a significant focus on clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additionally, their work touches on philosophy, psychiatry and mental health, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research topics span a broad range of mental health and psychological issues, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Forbes has contributed to multiple recent papers, demonstrating engagement with developments in psychopathology taxonomies and psychiatric practice. Notable publications include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence (2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology)
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum (2021, World Psychiatry)
  • Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research (2022, Psychological Medicine)

Frequent co-authors in Forbes's research include:

  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Roman Kotov
  • Aidan G.C. Wright
  • Nicholas R. Eaton
  • Matthew Sunderland

Their work is regularly published in a range of journals, showing an emphasis on clinical and psychological science. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Psychological Medicine
  • World Psychiatry
  • Psychological Methods

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Adolescent development and risk for the onset of social-emotional disorders: a review and conceptual model

    Ronald M. Rapee;Ella L. Oar;Carly J. Johnco;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability.

    Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.

    Ashley L. Greene;Nicholas R. Eaton;Kaiqiao Li;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Repeated Ketamine Infusions for Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Treatment-Resistant Depression.

    C. Sophia Albott;Kelvin O. Lim;Miriam K. Forbes;Christopher Erbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research

    Unknown

  • Beyond comorbidity: Toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span

    Miriam K. Forbes;Jennifer L. Tackett;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

  • Depression, Anxiety, and Peer Victimization: Bidirectional Relationships and Associated Outcomes Transitioning from Childhood to Adolescence

    Miriam K. Forbes;Sally Fitzpatrick;Natasha R. Magson;Ronald M. Rapee

  • Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model.

    Whitney R. Ringwald;Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright

  • A review of approaches and models in psychopathology conceptualization research

    Unknown

  • Sexual Quality of Life and Aging: A Prospective Study of a Nationally Representative Sample

    Miriam K. Forbes;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function

    Miriam K. Forbes;Andrew J. Baillie;Carolyn A. Schniering

  • Delineating the joint hierarchical structure of clinical and personality disorders in an outpatient psychiatric sample

    Miriam K. Forbes;Roman Kotov;Camilo J. Ruggero;David Watson

  • The Great Recession and Mental Health in the United States

    Miriam K. Forbes;Robert F. Krueger

  • Further evidence that psychopathology networks have limited replicability and utility: Response to Borsboom et al. (2017) and Steinley et al. (2017).

    Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Kristian E. Markon
Kristian E. Markon University of Iowa
Camilo J. Ruggero
Camilo J. Ruggero University of North Texas
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Irwin D. Waldman
Irwin D. Waldman Emory University
Matthew Sunderland
Matthew Sunderland University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open the door to diverse online degrees and specialized career options. Many students are interested in what jobs are in sports psychology, a growing field focused on helping athletes enhance performance and cope with pressure. Careers in sports psychology may include working with professional teams, schools, or private organizations.

Those considering clinical roles often wonder about the differences between therapists and psychologists. Understanding what is a clinical psychologist vs therapist is important for selecting the right program and licensure path. Typically, clinical psychologists require a doctoral degree, while therapists may hold master’s credentials and focus on a range of mental health services.

Advanced education also broadens potential career opportunities. You can learn more about the career paths for phd in psychology—including academic, clinical, and research roles. Conversely, if you’re attracted to sports psychology, find out how much can you earn with a master's in sports psychology and the types of roles available with a master’s-level education.

Best Scientists Citing Miriam K. Forbes

Trending Scientists