World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew Sunderland

Matthew Sunderland

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6388 5944 370 361 155 9521

Matthew Sunderland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew Sunderland between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew Sunderland published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2023. 44 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 18 publications
2007 2025

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew Sunderland: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 10
2013 6
2014 8
2015 8
2016 8
2017 10
2018 7
2019 19
2020 21
2021 26
2022 15
2023 29
2024 26
2025 18
Total 226
Download as CSV

Matthew Sunderland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Sunderland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 155
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew Sunderland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Sunderland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew Sunderland is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research spans across psychology and medicine, with significant contributions to clinical psychology, epidemiology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work addresses a wide range of topics including substance abuse treatment and outcomes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research, obesity, physical activity, diet, mental health treatment and access, mobile health applications, and personality disorders and psychopathology.

Sunderland's recent publications demonstrate a focus on psychopathology, developmental mental health, and the validity of psychiatric classification systems. Notable recent papers include:

  • Association Between Maternal Perinatal Depression and Anxiety and Child and Adolescent Development (2020) in JAMA Pediatrics
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum (2020) in World Psychiatry
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum (2021) in World Psychiatry
  • A systematic review of transdiagnostic risk and protective factors for general and specific psychopathology in young people (2021) in Clinical Psychology Review
  • A Detailed Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology: From Individual Symptoms up to the General Factor of Psychopathology (2021) in Clinical Psychological Science

The scholar regularly publishes in venues such as the Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Clinical Psychological Science, Addiction, and Psychological Medicine. These outlets reflect their interdisciplinary approach to psychological and medical research.

Frequent collaborators of Sunderland include Tim Slade, Maree Teesson, Cath Chapman, Nicola C. Newton, and Katrina E. Champion, indicating a network of co-authors focused on related fields of mental health and substance use research.

Best Publications

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Association Between Maternal Perinatal Depression and Anxiety and Child and Adolescent Development: A Meta-analysis.

    Alana Rogers;Shelley Obst;Samantha J Teague;Larissa Rossen;Larissa Rossen;Larissa Rossen

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

    Gavin Andrews;Alice Kemp;Matthew Sunderland;Michael Von Korff

  • Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: the SIAS-6 and the SPS-6.

    Lorna Peters;Matthew Sunderland;Gavin Andrews;Ronald M Rapee

  • Psychometric Comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for Measuring Response during Treatment of Depression

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F Dear;Dean McMillan;Tracy Anderson

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Health Anxiety in Australia: Prevalence, Comorbidity, Disability and Service Use

    Matthew Sunderland;Jill M. Newby;Gavin Andrews

  • Psychometric Comparison of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Measuring Response during Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    Blake F Dear;Nickolai Titov;Matthew Sunderland;Dean McMillan

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Adherence as a determinant of effectiveness of internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive disorders

    Zita Hilvert-Bruce;Pieter J. Rossouw;Nora Wong;Matthew Sunderland

  • A network approach to the comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder: The role of overlapping symptoms.

    Mohammad H. Afzali;Matthew Sunderland;Maree Teesson;Natacha Carragher

  • The relationship between social support networks and depression in the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Mohammad H. Afzali;Cath Chapman;Matthew Sunderland

  • Psychotic-like experiences in a community sample of 8000 children aged 9 to 11 years: an item response theory analysis

    Kristin Laurens;Megan Hobbs;Mathew Sunderland;Melissa Green

  • Effectiveness of school-based eHealth interventions to prevent multiple lifestyle risk behaviours among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Katrina E Champion;Katrina E Champion;Belinda Parmenter;Cyanna McGowan;Bonnie Spring

  • A systematic review of transdiagnostic risk and protective factors for general and specific psychopathology in young people.

    Samantha J. Lynch;Matthew Sunderland;Nicola C. Newton;Cath Chapman

  • The structure of adolescent psychopathology: a symptom-level analysis.

    N. Carragher;M. Teesson;M. Sunderland;N. C. Newton

  • The Distress Questionnaire-5: Population screener for psychological distress was more accurate than the K6/K10

    Philip J. Batterham;Matthew Sunderland;Natacha Carragher;Alison L. Calear

  • DSM-IV and DSM-5 social anxiety disorder in the Australian community

    Erica Crome;Rachel Grove;Andrew J Baillie;Matthew Sunderland

  • Classification of anxiety and depressive disorders: problems and solutions.

    G. Andrews;T.M. Anderson;T. Slade;M. Sunderland

  • Neurodevelopmental disorders: cluster 2 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11.

    G. Andrews;D. S. Pine;M. J. Hobbs;T. M. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Slade
Tim Slade University of Sydney
Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Alison L. Calear
Alison L. Calear Australian National University
Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
Maree Teesson
Maree Teesson University of Sydney
Frances Kay-Lambkin
Frances Kay-Lambkin University of Newcastle Australia
Andrew Baillie
Andrew Baillie University of Sydney
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Lexine Stapinski
Lexine Stapinski University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse careers in mental health, education, and communication sciences. For many students, online degrees in fields such as counseling, clinical psychology, and speech-language pathology provide greater flexibility for balancing study and personal commitments.

One increasingly popular pathway is speech-language pathology, which requires meeting specific state certification requirements. For instance, if you are interested in practicing in Idaho, you should review the Idaho slp certification requirements. Similarly, students looking to work in Illinois need to understand how to become a speech language pathologist in Illinois.

Requirements can vary significantly from state to state. Those interested in Indiana should check slp requirements in Indiana, while professionals planning to work in Iowa can explore slp requirements in Iowa.

Navigating these options ensures that your education aligns with state guidelines and sets a clear pathway toward certification and a rewarding career in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Sunderland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles