World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
19131
World Ranking
7728
National Ranking
200

Mary S. Wisz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary S. Wisz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 83 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mary S. Wisz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary S. Wisz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary S. Wisz is affiliated with the World Maritime University in Sweden and specializes in environmental science with a focus on coastal and marine management. Their research spans several subfields including ecology, management, monitoring, policy and law, global and planetary change, sociology and political science, and molecular biology.

Their academic work addresses multiple topics, notably:

  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality

Mary S. Wisz has contributed to a range of research papers, including:

  • "100 Opportunities for More Inclusive Ocean Research: Cross-Disciplinary Research Questions for Sustainable Ocean Governance and Management" (2020) published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "A National Scale "BioBlitz" Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish" (2022) published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Breaking down barriers: The identification of actions to promote gender equality in interdisciplinary marine research institutions" (2022) published in One Earth
  • "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance" (2021) published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Empowering young people with climate and ocean science: Five strategies for adults to consider" (2022) published in One Earth

Their publications often appear in prominent venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • One Earth
  • Frontiers in Climate
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Mary S. Wisz has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Laura G. Elsler
  • Andrei Polejack
  • Christopher Cvitanovic
  • Rachel Kelly
  • GT Pecl

Best Publications

  • Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data

    Jane Elith;Catherine H. Graham;Robert P. Anderson;Miroslav Dudík

  • Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models

    Mary Wisz;R. J. Hijmans;J. Li;A. T. Peterson

  • The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling

    Mary Susanne Wisz;Julien Pottier;W. Daniel Kissling;Loïc Pellissier

  • Prediction of the distribution of Arctic-nesting pink-footed geese under a warmer climate scenario

    Rikke A. Jensen;Jesper Madsen;Mark O'connell;Mary S. Wisz

  • Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence species distribution models and their predictions? An information-theoretic approach based on simulated data

    Mary S Wisz;Antoine Guisan

  • Quaternary coral reef refugia preserved fish diversity

    Loïc Pellissier;Loïc Pellissier;Fabien Leprieur;Valeriano Parravicini;Peter F. Cowman

  • Testing species distribution models across space and time: high latitude butterflies and recent warming

    Anne Eskildsen;Peter C. le Roux;Risto K. Heikkinen;Toke Thomas Høye

  • Modelling spatial patterns in harbour porpoise satellite telemetry data using maximum entropy

    Susi M.C. Edren;Mary Suzanne Wisz;Jonas Teilmann;Rune Dietz

  • Projecting future distribution of the seagrass Zostera noltii under global warming and sea level rise

    Mireia Valle;Guillem Chust;Andrea del Campo;Mary S. Wisz

  • Forecasted coral reef decline in marine biodiversity hotspots under climate change.

    Patrice Descombes;Mary S. Wisz;Fabien Leprieur;Valerianio Parravicini

  • Arctic warming will promote Atlantic–Pacific fish interchange

    Mary Wisz;O. Broennimann;Peter Grønkjær;Peter R. Møller

  • Spatiotemporal SNP analysis reveals pronounced biocomplexity at the northern range margin of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua.

    Nina Overgaard Therkildsen;Jakob Hemmer‐Hansen;Rasmus Berg Hedeholm;Mary S. Wisz

  • Prioritizing refuge sites for migratory geese to alleviate conflicts with agriculture

    Rikke A. Jensen;Mary S. Wisz;Jesper Madsen

  • Predictive habitat modelling of humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Antarctic minke (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) whales in the Southern Ocean as a planning tool for seismic surveys

    Annette Bombosch;Daniel P. Zitterbart;Daniel P. Zitterbart;Ilse Van Opzeeland;Stephan Frickenhaus

  • A National Scale “BioBlitz” Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish

    Unknown

  • WTO must ban harmful fisheries subsidies

    U. Rashid Sumaila;Daniel J. Skerritt;Anna Schuhbauer;Sebastian Villasante

  • Climate change, non‐indigenous species and shipping: assessing the risk of species introduction to a high‐Arctic archipelago

    Chris Ware;Chris Ware;Jørgen Berge;Jan H. Sundet;Jamie B. Kirkpatrick

  • Combining food web and species distribution models for improved community projections

    Loïc Pellissier;Rudolf P. Rohr;Charlotte Ndiribe;Jean-Nicolas Pradervand

  • Horizontal, but not vertical, biotic interactions affect fine‐scale plant distribution patterns in a low‐energy system

    Peter C. le Roux;Jonathan Lenoir;Loïc Pellissier;Loïc Pellissier;Mary S. Wisz

  • Incorporating dominant species as proxies for biotic interactions strengthens plant community models

    Peter Christiaan Le Roux;Peter Christiaan Le Roux;Loïc Pellissier;Mary S. Wisz;Mary S. Wisz;Miska Luoto

  • Using potential distributions to explore determinants of Western Palaearctic migratory songbird species richness in sub-Saharan Africa

    Mary S. Wisz;B. A. Walther;C. Rahbek

  • Predicting the distribution of deep-sea vulnerable marine ecosystems using high-resolution data: Considerations and novel approaches

    Anna M. Rengstorf;Christian Mohn;Colin Brown;Mary S. Wisz

Frequent Co-Authors

Antoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan University of Lausanne
Miska Luoto
Miska Luoto University of Helsinki
Peter Christiaan le Roux
Peter Christiaan le Roux University of Pretoria
Inger Greve Alsos
Inger Greve Alsos University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Einar Eg Nielsen
Einar Eg Nielsen Technical University of Denmark
Jesper Madsen
Jesper Madsen Aarhus University
Christian Damgaard
Christian Damgaard Aarhus University
David Mouillot
David Mouillot University of Montpellier
Peter Grønkjær
Peter Grønkjær Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students with a background in these fields consider adjacent pathways such as library and information science, healthcare, and communication sciences.

Those interested in managing scientific information often explore the cheapest library science degree online options. These programs are ideal for future science librarians or data specialists seeking affordable education.

If you’re interested in health and biology, consider clinical roles such as speech-language pathology or nursing. There are asha accredited online slp master's programs that combine flexible learning with recognized credentials. For those coming from a non-clinical background, online bridge programs non-SLP majors offer a streamlined path to enter the field.

Similarly, students without prior nursing experience may consider online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which help fast-track entry into versatile healthcare professions.

These online degrees make it easier to shift or advance your career while building on your foundation in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Mary S. Wisz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles