World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
56424
World Ranking
6486
National Ranking
2191

Robert P. Anderson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert P. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Robert P. Anderson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert P. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert P. Anderson is affiliated with the City College of New York in the United States. Their research spans the field of Environmental Science, with particular focus on subfields such as Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, and Artificial Intelligence.

Anderson's work is largely concentrated on main topics including Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Genetic diversity and population structure, Data Analysis with R, Zoonotic diseases and public health, and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies.

The scientist has published several papers in prominent venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • ENMeval 2.0: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species' niches and distributions, 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • wallace 2: a shiny app for modeling species niches and distributions redesigned to facilitate expansion via module contributions, 2023, Ecography
  • Top ten hazards to avoid when modeling species distributions: a didactic guide of assumptions, problems, and recommendations, 2024, Ecography
  • Optimizing biodiversity informatics to improve information flow, data quality, and utility for science and society, 2020, Frontiers of Biogeography
  • Improving area of occupancy estimates for parapatric species using distribution models and support vector machines, 2020, Ecological Applications

Frequent co-authors working alongside Anderson include:

  • Jamie M. Kass
  • Gonzalo E. Pinilla-Buitrago
  • Bethany A. Johnson
  • Sarah I. Meenan
  • Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens

The venues where Anderson has frequently published comprise:

  • Ecography
  • Frontiers of Biogeography
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • Ecological Applications
  • Global Change Biology

Best Publications

  • Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions

    Steven J. Phillips;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Robert E. Schapire

  • Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data

    Jane Elith;Catherine H. Graham;Robert P. Anderson;Miroslav Dudík

  • Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent

    Steven J. Phillips;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Miroslav Dudík;Robert E. Schapire

  • Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions (MPB-49)

    A. Townsend Peterson;Jorge Soberón;Richard G. Pearson;Robert P. Anderson

  • spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models

    Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens;Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens;Robert A. Boria;Aleksandar Radosavljevic;Bruno Vilela

  • ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models

    Robert Muscarella;Peter J. Galante;Mariano Soley‐Guardia;Robert A. Boria

  • Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models

    Robert P Anderson;Daniel Lew;A.Townsend Peterson

  • Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation

    Aleksandar Radosavljevic;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson

  • Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions

    AT Peterson;J Soberon;RG Pearson;RP Anderson

  • Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models

    Robert A. Boria;Link E. Olson;Steven M. Goodman;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson

  • Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments

    Miguel B. Araujo;Miguel B. Araujo;Miguel B. Araujo;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;A. Marcia Barbosa;Colin Michael Beale

  • The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela

    Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Ali Raza

  • Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes

    Mariya Shcheglovitova;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson

  • Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent

    Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Israel Gonzalez

  • ENMeval 2.0: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species’ niches and distributions

    Jamie M. Kass;Jamie M. Kass;Robert Muscarella;Peter J. Galante;Corentin L. Bohl

  • Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice

    Robert P. Anderson;A. Townsend Peterson;Marcela Gómez‐Laverde

  • Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models

    Robert P. Anderson;Marcela Gomez-Laverde;A. Townsend Peterson

  • Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models

    Sara Varela;Sara Varela;Robert P. Anderson;Robert P. Anderson;Raúl García-Valdés;Raúl García-Valdés;Raúl García-Valdés;Federico Fernández-González

  • Modeling species’ geographic distributions for preliminary conservation assessments: an implementation with the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Ecuador

    Robert P. Anderson;Enrique Martı́nez-Meyer

  • A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions

    Robert P. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Townsend Peterson
A. Townsend Peterson University of Kansas
Enrique Martínez-Meyer
Enrique Martínez-Meyer National Autonomous University of Mexico
Miguel B. Araújo
Miguel B. Araújo University of Évora
Richard G. Pearson
Richard G. Pearson University College London
Robert Muscarella
Robert Muscarella Uppsala University
Antoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan University of Lausanne
Cory Merow
Cory Merow University of Connecticut
Jorge M. Lobo
Jorge M. Lobo Spanish National Research Council
Robert M. Timm
Robert M. Timm University of Kansas
Robert E. Schapire
Robert E. Schapire Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens the door to a variety of allied career opportunities and educational paths, many accessible through flexible online options. For those looking to transition into related fields, bridge programs can be a valuable route. For example, speech pathology bridge programs provide a gateway for non-SLP majors to enter the field of speech-language pathology.

If you are interested in healthcare, nursing degrees remain among the most sought-after online programs. Finding the cheapest online accelerated BSN programs can help you fast-track your nursing credentials affordably, even without a previous nursing background.

Nurse practitioner roles also represent a strong career pathway with distinctive salary ranges depending on location. For those considering advanced practice, current salary data—such as that for a psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state—can be an important consideration.

Prospective students often wonder about the required commitment to become a nurse practitioner. Understanding how many years to become a nurse practitioner helps in planning for a future in this dynamic and impactful field.

Best Scientists Citing Robert P. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles