World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
6370
World Ranking
7525
National Ranking
2532

Catherine S. Jarnevich publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Jarnevich sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Catherine S. Jarnevich D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Jarnevich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine S. Jarnevich is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research centers on environmental science with a strong focus on ecology and related subfields. Key areas of study include ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, and global and planetary change.

They have contributed significantly to topics such as ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, species distribution and climate change, rangeland and wildlife management, fire effects on ecosystems, plant and animal studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, and forest insect ecology and management.

Their publication record includes several papers in well-regarded journals. Recent papers include:

  • "A framework to integrate innovations in invasion science for proactive management" (2022) published in Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "Observed and Potential Range Shifts of Native and Nonnative Species with Climate Change" (2024) published in Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • "Grassification and Fast-Evolving Fire Connectivity and Risk in the Sonoran Desert, United States" (2021) published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Modelling presence versus abundance for invasive species risk assessment" (2021) published in Diversity and Distributions
  • "INHABIT: A web-based decision support tool for invasive plant species habitat visualization and assessment across the contiguous United States" (2022) published in PLoS ONE

Their research output is prominently featured in publication venues including Diversity and Distributions, PLoS ONE, NeoBiota, Landscape Ecology, and Biological Invasions.

They frequently collaborate with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Helen R. Sofaer
  • Peder Engelstad
  • Ian S. Pearse
  • Janet S. Prevéy
  • Nicholas E. Young

Best Publications

  • Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges

    Michael C. Dietze;Andrew Fox;Lindsay M. Beck-Johnson;Julio L. Betancourt

  • Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling

    Catherine S. Jarnevich;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Sunil Kumar;Jeffery T. Morisette

  • The area under the precision‐recall curve as a performance metric for rare binary events

    Helen R. Sofaer;Jennifer A. Hoeting;Catherine S. Jarnevich

  • Development and Delivery of Species Distribution Models to Inform Decision-Making

    Helen R Sofaer;Catherine S Jarnevich;Ian S Pearse;Regan L Smyth

  • Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists

    Alycia W. Crall;Gregory J. Newman;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Thomas J. Stohlgren

  • Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species

    Paul H. Evangelista;Sunil Kumar;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Catherine S. Jarnevich

  • Ensemble habitat mapping of invasive plant species.

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Peter Ma;Sunil Kumar;Monique Rocca

  • Scale and plant invasions: A theory of biotic acceptance

    T.J. Stohlgren;C. Jarnevich;G.W. Chong;P.H. Evangelista

  • The myth of plant species saturation

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;David T. Barnett;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Curtis Flather

  • A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States

    Jeffrey T. Morisette;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Asad Ullah;Weijie Cai

  • VisTrails SAHM: visualization and workflow management for species habitat modeling

    Jeffrey T. Morisette;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Tracy R. Holcombe;Colin B. Talbert

  • Challenges in Identifying Sites Climatically Matched to the Native Ranges of Animal Invaders

    Gordon H. Rodda;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Robert N. Reed

  • Modeling the Geographic Distribution of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the Contiguous United States

    Micah B. Hahn;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Andrew J. Monaghan;Rebecca J. Eisen

  • Modeling the Present and Future Geographic Distribution of the Lone Star Tick, Amblyomma americanum (Ixodida: Ixodidae), in the Continental United States

    Yuri P. Springer;Catherine S. Jarnevich;David T. Barnett;Andrew J. Monaghan

  • Distribution and Abundance of Saltcedar and Russian Olive in the Western United States

    Pamela L. Nagler;Edward P. Glenn;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Patrick B. Shafroth

  • Mapping current and potential distribution of non-native Prosopis juliflora in the Afar region of Ethiopia.

    Tewodros T. Wakie;Paul H. Evangelista;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Melinda Laituri

  • What parts of the US mainland are climatically suitable for invasive alien pythons spreading from Everglades National Park

    Gordon H. Rodda;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Robert N. Reed

  • Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree

    Catherine S. Jarnevich;Lindsay V. Reynolds

  • Invasive species information networks: collaboration at multiple scales for prevention, early detection, and rapid response to invasive alien species

    Annie Simpson;Catherine S. Jarnevich;John Madsen;Randy G. Westbrooks

  • Citizen science contributes to our knowledge of invasive plant species distributions.

    Alycia W. Crall;Alycia W. Crall;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Nicholas E. Young;Brendon J. Panke

  • Using habitat suitability models to target invasive plant species surveys

    Alycia W. Crall;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Brendon Panke;Nick Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas J. Stohlgren
Thomas J. Stohlgren Colorado State University
Jeffrey T. Morisette
Jeffrey T. Morisette United States Geological Survey
Curtis H. Flather
Curtis H. Flather US Forest Service
Julio L. Betancourt
Julio L. Betancourt United States Geological Survey
Henry W. Loescher
Henry W. Loescher National Ecological Observatory Network
Andrew J. Monaghan
Andrew J. Monaghan University of Colorado Boulder
Ian S. Pearse
Ian S. Pearse United States Geological Survey
Rebecca J. Eisen
Rebecca J. Eisen Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Bryan C. Pijanowski
Bryan C. Pijanowski Purdue University West Lafayette
Edward P. Glenn
Edward P. Glenn University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Ecology and Evolution, exploring adjacent online programs and related career pathways can broaden your opportunities. Many students opt for flexible learning options, choosing reputable, not for profit online colleges that ensure quality education and accreditation. These institutions are committed to student outcomes, making them an excellent choice for ethically conscious learners.

Aspiring biologists and environmental scientists might compare program features using examples from other fields, such as the chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program comparison. Such reviews highlight the importance of flexible curricula, student support services, and transfer credit policies—factors that are also crucial in the sciences.

Affordability is often a priority. Students can learn from the healthcare field by looking at resources on online bsn programs, which showcase schools with cost-effective tuition and robust online learning environments.

For those with military backgrounds, it’s also worth considering the best military friendly colleges in America. These colleges often offer special support, credit transfer options, and flexible schedules ideal for active duty or veteran students aspiring to careers in ecology, conservation, or environmental policy.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine S. Jarnevich

Trending Scientists