World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Vojtěch Jarošík

Vojtěch Jarošík

Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Czechia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
64
Citations
23723
World Ranking
1832
National Ranking
7

Vojtěch Jarošík publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vojtěch Jarošík sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 104 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Vojtěch Jarošík D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vojtěch Jarošík sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award

Overview

Vojtěch Jarošík was affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic. Their research focused primarily within the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, contributing specifically to subfields such as Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics in Jarošík's research included:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Plant Virus Research Studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance

Jarošík published at least two documented papers, both appearing in UNC Libraries:

  • Controls on pathogen species richness in plants' introduced and native ranges: roles of residence time, range size and host traits (2020)
  • Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? (2021)

Their work involved collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including Dana M. Blumenthal and Petr Pyšek, each collaborating on two publications. Other co-authors included Charles E. Mitchell, Emily E. Puckett, and John Parker.

The publications were entirely within UNC Libraries, reflecting a consistent choice of venue for disseminating research findings. There were no recorded book publications associated with Jarošík.

Best Publications

  • Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems

    Montserrat Vilà;José L Espinar;Martin Hejda;Philip E Hulme

  • A proposed unified framework for biological invasions.

    Tim M. Blackburn;Tim M. Blackburn;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Sven Bacher;James T. Carlton

  • Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities

    Gian Reto Walther;Alain Roques;Philip E. Hulme;Martin T. Sykes

  • A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Philip E. Hulme;Jan Pergl;Jan Pergl

  • Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities

    Martin Hejda;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;David M. Richardson;Jan Pergl;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe

    Petr Pysek;Vojtech Jarosík;Philip E Hulme;Ingolf Kühn

  • Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt

    Franz Essl;Stefan Dullinger;Wolfgang Rabitsch;Philip E. Hulme

  • SEPARATING HABITAT INVASIBILITY BY ALIEN PLANTS FROM THE ACTUAL LEVEL OF INVASION

    Milan Chytrý;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Ondřej Hájek

  • Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts

    Philip E. Hulme;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Jan Pergl;Jan Pergl

  • Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns

    Petr Pyšek;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Sádlo;Jindřich Chrtek

  • Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges

    John D. Parker;Mark E. Torchin;Ruth A. Hufbauer;Nathan P. Lemoine

  • Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Martin Křivánek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits

    Petr Pysek;Jan Pergl;Rod Randall

  • Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators

    Unknown

  • Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion.

    Dana Blumenthal;Charles E. Mitchell;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Sven Bacher;Milan Chytrý;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • An inventory of invasive alien species in China

    Haigen Xu;Sheng Qiang;Piero Genovesi;Hui Ding

  • Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík

  • Relationship between the minimum and maximum temperature thresholds for development in insects

    Anthony F.G. Dixon;Alois Honěk;Petr Keil;Mohamed Ali A. Kotela

  • Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas.

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Jan Pergl;Jan Pergl

Frequent Co-Authors

Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Jan Pergl
Jan Pergl Czech Academy of Sciences
Milan Chytrý
Milan Chytrý Masaryk University
Montserrat Vilà
Montserrat Vilà Spanish National Research Council
Philip E. Hulme
Philip E. Hulme Lincoln University
Ingolf Kühn
Ingolf Kühn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Jan Wild
Jan Wild Czech Academy of Sciences
Sven Bacher
Sven Bacher University of Fribourg
Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
Llewellyn C. Foxcroft South African National Parks
Wolfgang Nentwig
Wolfgang Nentwig University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to related fields where interdisciplinary skills are highly valued. For example, historians with scientific literacy are in demand for roles involving biodiversity archives and environmental data. Those interested can explore the best online master's in history programs to enhance research skills and ecological context through historical perspectives.

Libraries, museums, and research centers often seek professionals familiar with both ecological science and information management. Earning a degree from the cheapest library science degree online may provide an affordable pathway to these roles, boosting your expertise in digital resources and scientific archives.

Communication abilities are also crucial in science-related careers. Accredited online programs, such as the accredited speech pathology programs, offer training in science communication and help develop skills to convey complex ecological data to broad audiences.

For those without a background in speech-language sciences, the online speech-language pathology prerequisites program provides a flexible way to gain necessary prerequisites—potentially leading to new interdisciplinary career paths that blend ecology, evolution, and communication.

Best Scientists Citing Vojtěch Jarošík

Recently Published Articles