World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
6370
World Ranking
7773
National Ranking
92

Llewellyn C. Foxcroft publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Llewellyn C. Foxcroft sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Llewellyn C. Foxcroft D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Llewellyn C. Foxcroft sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Llewellyn C. Foxcroft is affiliated with South African National Parks in South Africa. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing extensively to several subfields including nature and landscape conservation, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, insect science, and plant science.

Their work covers a variety of topics such as ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, biological control of invasive species, plant and animal studies, species distribution and climate change, botany, ecology, and taxonomy studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, as well as plant diversity and evolution.

Foxcroft has published numerous scientific papers, appearing frequently in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), NeoBiota, Biological Invasions, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, and Scientific Reports.

Recent papers include:

  • "Scientists' warning on invasive alien species," 2020, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "Invasion syndromes: a systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management," 2020, Biological Invasions
  • "Curbing the major and growing threats from invasive alien species is urgent and achievable," 2024, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Assessing biological invasions in protected areas after 30 years: Revisiting nature reserves targeted by the 1980s SCOPE programme," 2020, Biological Conservation
  • "A framework to support alien species regulation: the Risk Analysis for Alien Taxa (RAAT)," 2020, NeoBiota

Foxcroft collaborates regularly with various researchers including Petr Pyšek, Klára Pyšková, Jan Čuda, John R. Wilson, and Sandra MacFadyen, with whom they have co-authored multiple publications.

Best Publications

  • Scientists' warning on invasive alien species.

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Philip E. Hulme;Dan Simberloff;Sven Bacher

  • Plant invasion science in protected areas: progress and priorities

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;David M. Richardson;Piero Genovesi

  • Ornamental plants as invasive aliens: problems and solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa.

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;David M. Richardson;John R. U. Wilson

  • Human population density explains alien species richness in protected areas

    Dian Spear;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Hugo Bezuidenhout;Hugo Bezuidenhout;Melodie A. McGeoch;Melodie A. McGeoch

  • Residue allelopathy in Parthenium hysterophorus L.—Does parthenin play a leading role?

    Regina G. Belz;Carl Frederick Reinhardt;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Karl Hurle

  • Alien plant invasions in tropical and sub-tropical savannas: patterns, processes and prospects

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;David M. Richardson;Marcel Rejmánek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek

  • Plant Invasions in Protected Areas

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Petr Pyšek;David M. Richardson;Piero Genovesi

  • Protected-Area Boundaries as Filters of Plant Invasions

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;David M. Richardson

  • Reconstructing 50 years of Opuntia stricta invasion in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: environmental determinants and propagule pressure

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Mathieu Rouget;David M. Richardson;Sandra Mac Fadyen

  • Hitting the right target: taxonomic challenges for, and of, plant invasions

    Peter Pyšek;Peter Pyšek;Philip E. Hulme;Laura A. Meyerson;Gideon F. Smith;Gideon F. Smith

  • Curbing the major and growing threats from invasive alien species is urgent and achievable

    Unknown

  • Invasion syndromes: a systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management

    Ana Novoa;Ana Novoa;David M. Richardson;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Laura A. Meyerson

  • Plant invasions in protected areas : patterns, problems and challenges

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Piero Genovesi;Petr Pyšek;D. M. Richardson

  • Risk Assessment of Riparian Plant Invasions into Protected Areas

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Mathieu Rouget;David M. Richardson

  • Invasion dynamics of Lantana camara L. (sensu lato) in South Africa

    W. Vardien;D.M. Richardson;L.C. Foxcroft;L.C. Foxcroft;G.D. Thompson

  • Patterns of alien plant distribution at multiple spatial scales in a large national park: Implications for ecology, management and monitoring

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;David M. Richardson;Mathieu Rouget;Sandra MacFadyen

  • The status of biological invasions and their management in South Africa

    Brian W. Van Wilgen;John R. Wilson;Katelyn T. Faulkner;Zanele Mnikathi (Sanbi)

  • Expanding the conceptual frameworks of plant invasion ecology

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Steward T.A. Pickett;Mary L. Cadenasso

  • Assessing biological invasions in protected areas after 30 years: revisiting nature reserves targeted by the 1980s SCOPE programme

    Ross T. Shackleton;Ross T. Shackleton;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Louisa E. Wood

  • Managing alien plant invasions in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;David M. Richardson

  • The biogeography of South African terrestrial plant invasions.

    D.M. Richardson;L.C. Foxcroft;L.C. Foxcroft;G. Latombe;G. Latombe;D.C. Le Maitre

  • The Bottom Line: Impacts of Alien Plant Invasions in Protected Areas

    Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Llewellyn C. Foxcroft;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;David M. Richardson;Jan Pergl

Frequent Co-Authors

Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
David M. Richardson
David M. Richardson Stellenbosch University
John R. U. Wilson
John R. U. Wilson South African National Biodiversity Institute
Melodie A. McGeoch
Melodie A. McGeoch Monash University
Piero Genovesi
Piero Genovesi Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale
Mathieu Rouget
Mathieu Rouget Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Vojtěch Jarošík
Vojtěch Jarošík Charles University
Karen J. Esler
Karen J. Esler Stellenbosch University
Franz Essl
Franz Essl University of Vienna
Johannes J. Le Roux
Johannes J. Le Roux Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse online degree pathways and career options in life sciences and beyond. Many students consider related fields such as health sciences or nursing, where flexible programs can provide fast entry into the workforce. For example, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online allow those with science backgrounds to pivot into advanced nursing roles quickly.

If you already have a registered nurse credential, there are efficient degree completion options, such as best value nursing education online wgu and other programs that help maximize your education investment. Those looking to build credentials further might explore rn to bsn to msn online programs for an affordable academic journey from bachelor’s to master’s level.

Regardless of discipline, choosing the right institution is crucial. Consider non profit online colleges to ensure high academic standards and recognized accreditation for your online studies. A focus on flexible, accredited online education can help you build vital skills for dynamic, science-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Llewellyn C. Foxcroft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles