World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
17086
World Ranking
1775
National Ranking
650

Thomas J. Stohlgren publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Stohlgren sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 217 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas J. Stohlgren D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Stohlgren sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Stohlgren is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with notable contributions spanning related subfields such as nature and landscape conservation, ecology, ecological modeling, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The main topics addressed in their work include ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, species distribution and climate change, rangeland and wildlife management, forest insect ecology and management, and rangeland management and livestock ecology.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • A modeling workflow that balances automation and human intervention to inform invasive plant management decisions at multiple spatial scales, 2020, published in PLoS ONE
  • PLANT SPECIES INVASIONS ALONG THE LATITUDINAL GRADIENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 2021, published by UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Thomas J. Stohlgren are:

  • Robert G. Woodmansee
  • William H. Romme
  • Paul Evangelista
  • Nicholas E. Young
  • Catherine S. Jarnevich

The scientist's work has been published mainly in the venues:

  • PLoS ONE
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Dan Binkley;Geneva W. Chong;Mohammed A. Kalkhan

  • The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions.

    J. D. Fridley;J. J. Stachowicz;S. Naeem;D. F. Sax

  • Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia

    Sunil Kumar;Thomas J. Stohlgren

  • The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;David T. Barnett;John T. Kartesz

  • A Modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method

    T. J. Stohlgren;M. B. Falkner;L. D. Schell

  • GLOBAL POTENTIAL NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION PREDICTED FROM VEGETATION CLASS, PRECIPITATION, AND TEMPERATURE

    Stephen Del Grosso;Stephen Del Grosso;William Parton;Thomas Stohlgren;Daolan Zheng

  • Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study

    Alycia W. Crall;Gregory J. Newman;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Kirstin A. Holfelder

  • How grazing and soil quality affect native and exotic plant diversity in Rocky Mountain grasslands

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Lisa D. Schell;Brian Vanden Heuvel

  • Riparian zones as havens for exotic plant species in the central grasslands

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Kelly A. Bull;Yuka Otsuki;Cynthia A. Villa

  • Risk analysis for biological hazards: what we need to know about invasive species.

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;John L. Schnase

  • Evidence that local land use practices influence regional climate, vegetation, and stream flow patterns in adjacent natural areas.

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Thomas N. Chase;Roger A. Pielke;Timothy G. F. Kittel

  • Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling

    Catherine S. Jarnevich;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Sunil Kumar;Jeffery T. Morisette

  • Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness.

    Sunil Kumar;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Geneva W. Chong

  • Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists

    Alycia W. Crall;Gregory J. Newman;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Thomas J. Stohlgren

  • Field validation of an invasive species Maxent model

    Amanda M. West;Sunil Kumar;Cynthia S Brown;Thomas J. Stohlgren

  • Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species

    Paul H. Evangelista;Sunil Kumar;Thomas J. Stohlgren;Catherine S. Jarnevich

  • Comparison of rangeland vegetation sampling techniques in the Central Grasslands

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Kelly A. Bull;Yuka Otsuki

  • Measuring Plant Diversity: Lessons from the Field

    Thomas J. Stohlgren

  • Ensemble habitat mapping of invasive plant species.

    Thomas J. Stohlgren;Peter Ma;Sunil Kumar;Monique Rocca

  • Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US

    Sunil Kumar;Sarah A Spaulding;Sarah A Spaulding;Thomas J Stohlgren;Karl A Hermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine S. Jarnevich
Catherine S. Jarnevich United States Geological Survey
Dan Binkley
Dan Binkley Colorado State University
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Curtis H. Flather
Curtis H. Flather US Forest Service
Roger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke University of Colorado Boulder
Timothy G. F. Kittel
Timothy G. F. Kittel University of Colorado Boulder
Jeffrey T. Morisette
Jeffrey T. Morisette United States Geological Survey
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Jayne Belnap
Jayne Belnap United States Geological Survey
Merrill R. Kaufmann
Merrill R. Kaufmann US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a variety of career paths, ranging from research and conservation to education and healthcare. Many students interested in life sciences may also consider healthcare professions, where there is growing demand for advanced credentials and specialized training.

For those with a background in nursing, pursuing asn to np programs offers a streamlined route to becoming a Nurse Practitioner. Candidates without a prior nursing degree can take advantage of direct entry msn online programs, which provide a fast-track option for transitioning into nursing careers.

Choosing a reputable program is essential. When comparing nursing schools, consider reputable options like those highlighted in top rated online nursing schools wgu. Additionally, affordability is a key issue for many. Flexible and bsn to msn online programs make career advancement more accessible to working professionals.

Whether your goal is environmental science or a healthcare specialization, exploring related online degrees can help you find the right pathway for your professional growth in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Stohlgren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles